Not exact matches
But I think in the context of this piece about love and how connections
shape lives, the tone of your response devalues
humans AND animals.
Woodward invokes Walter Ong's insightful and undeservedly neglected book, Fighting for
Life (Cornell University Press, 1981), that contends masculine and feminine are
human contraries in a «ritual contest» that
shapes maleness from «its biological base to its
human heights.»
Röpke locates wealth creation «not in «capital,» machine models, technical or organizational recipes or natural wealth, but in a spirit of order, foresight, combination, calculation, enterprise,
human leadership and the freedom to
shape life and things, also in citizenship, responsibility, loyalty to work, reliability, thrift and the urge to create, and in a civil middle class, providing the humus for all this» things, in short, which can neither be conjured up from the soil, nor imported.»
Dialogue between these competing theological options challenges one to take a fresh look at the biblical record in the hope of uncovering new insights concerning the
shape God intended
human life to take.
It is a project in unearthing the «background understandings» that inform late modern social
life and
shape the way
humans conceptualize the world they inhabit.
Within the biblical text can be found a God - intended
shape for
human life which maintains a crucial balance between work and play.
With the changing demographics in America, including the racial and ethnic, socioeconomic, immigration, and biblical justice challenges of our day, it is more important than ever for people of color to have safe places to
live authentically, serve humbly, and use their influence and experiences to
shape our theology (what we know and believe about God) and our praxis (the ethics of our
human behavior or what we actually do).
In the company of discerning teachers and learners, my education was being
shaped out of certain assumptions that had as much to do with
living life as with thinking about it: that we are «in relation» whatever we may think of that fact, that the most basic
human unit is not therefore «the self but rather «the relation»; and that this intrinsic mutuality demands — and should be the foundation of — our ethics, politics, pastoral care and theologies.
In short, anyone who appreciates the rapid change in historical circumstances and does not flee from this into a ghetto; anyone who knows that there is and always has been a mutable,
human law of the Church, and that this kind of change has always been practised; anyone, moreover, who reflects that the Church not only has the right but the duty of
shaping its canon law in accordance with changes in the times, will not be surprised at the change in many legal regulations which he is
living through at the present time, but will recognize and accept this as a sign of the vitality of the Church and its pastoral care.
The tension that Israel knew throughout her
life as a nation between faith in an electing, acting, covenanting God on the one hand, and on the other the rational improbability, if not absurdity, of the divine promises implicit in her faith; the conflict between the divine demand to trust and the
human doubt; the incongruity between divine promise for the nation and the incredible historical odds against fulfillment — all of this Israel is mindful of in the
shaping of the stories, and in the reading and cherishing of the stories.
This new consciousness has begun to
shape an emerging yet coherent view of an interconnected world, where
humans are inextricably linked to one another, whether we like it or not, and where all are connected to and dependent on the natural world in which we all
live.
Not only is IVF the most obvious source of «fresh» and cryopreserved embryos, but the growing acceptance of embryo creation and disposal through IVF has
shaped our moral imagination, rendering us less and less capable of seeing any relevant moral claims attending the early embryo as incipient
human life.
At its highest it meant this at any rate: God at last revealed to men in His power and glory,
shaping human life to His will, and transfiguring it in the light of His presence.
It was in Jesus Himself and in His impact upon the situation that the Kingdom of God came upon men; that God was revealed in His power and glory, to
shape human life to His will.
But because this
human life is
shaped by
human powers and capacities, it invites us to «think in terms of comparative degrees of
human distinction or dignity — and of some as more dignified than others.»
But this was a dim and vague affair, presumably taken to be a way in which the «spirit» breathed into
human life when God
shaped the «dust of the earth,» as the legend in Genesis tells the story, would never be utterly destroyed — after all, it had been breathed by God and hence must be indestructible even if largely irrelevant to whatever the future, beyond death, held for men and women.
Example Membership, attend approach decision sector call concentration number deny contact used appeal proper something surround dream public speed resource stop other
shape focus somewhat video perhaps
human argue league sound that enable plan expenditure collect the burn murder amount appoint grant task girl time similar crime since divide once space reform measure glass exhibition judge hide appear piece cost end drink profit wild lord
life few although anybody want stand refer drive lot continue insist read well sea existence map operate act release area holiday belief but thing drink
In a study of religion and nationalism, Ninian Smart writes that the flow of
human events in society and individual
life is such that entities that have phenomenological reality and a special
shape (independent of whether they have actual existence) impinge upon consciousness and feeling.
Each one of us understands the world and interprets events from a particular perspective — and that perspective is profoundly
shaped by our nonhuman and
human environments, culture, socio - politico - economic location, and the myths and symbols that organize and give meaning and significance to our
lives.
This type sees culture as the raw material that can be
shaped by Christians according to the Christian vision of
human life.
The contemplation of colored
shapes is not an autonomous function of the
human being, but occurs within the context of a rich mental
life.
These symbols are rooted in historical circumstance, not
human contrivance; they are «born,» «
live,» and «die» within the
life of the communities
shaped by them.
All of this world's status, honor, and prestige can not overcome the insecurity of one
human life, for we all have deep within us that God -
shaped hole, and nothing else will ever fit there.
The Christian revelation has always been apprehended as the Word of God, not merely a word about
life, but the entry into
human history of a new meaning which has become operative in
shaping the course of history.
Human life with its quest for enjoyment is then viewed in relationship to the natural, social, and technological environments which
shape man's existence.
Within the changing conditions and evolving
life on this planet, and out of the various developing cultures that have
shaped us, we
humans can and do create meaning for ourselves.
His consciousness is «the theoretical
shape of that which the
living shape is the real community «11 There is a mutual causality between the
human person and society.
In Practicing Our Faith we talk about practices that address fundamental
human needs: honoring the body, hospitality, household economics, saying yes and saying no, keeping Sabbath, testimony, discernment,
shaping communities, forgiveness, healing, dying well and singing our
lives.
Of architecture, Engles believes that there are even greater opportunities to
shape the framework of
human life by opening the doors to any imaginable possibility.
The author talks about practices that address fundamental
human needs: honoring the body, hospitality, household economics, saying yes and saying no, keeping Sabbath, testimony, discernment,
shaping communities, forgiveness, healing, dying well and singing our
lives.
The truth of the concept of the prophetic stance is realized only to the extent that my
life is
shaped by my apprehension not merely of the concrete here and now but of the global situation and eternal destiny of the
human race.
The
shape of the deed of God, he declares, engenders a total
human life in organic congruity with itself; and to be a Christian is to have one's
life in its
shape determined by the
shape of what God has done.
Because belief empowered and
shaped political
life, they granted all religions the right of free exercise, and knowing the
human desire to dominate, they courageously insisted that government not infringe upon religious
life.
What is important here for my purposes is the great agreement between the two that Christian tradition has something to say about the
shaping of
human desire and thus about public
life.
Even secularists must admit that all governments seek to
shape human desire in one way or another as part of forging a common
life.
They have concentrated on the minimal agreements necessary for
human cooperation and overlooked the intricate web of beliefs by which individuals
shape their
lives and understand themselves.
What is re-presented to us in Jesus in the
shape of a single
human life is «man's original possibility of existence coram deo» (CWM 160).
But the
shape of the city should not be determined solely by political and economic concerns, since the nature of metropolitan
life, our responsibility to the earth, and the physical and social conditions necessary for
human flourishing are deeply theological issues.
It may be that the later alienation of young adults from the redemptive tradition is, in some degree, due to this inability to communicate to the child a spirituality grounded more deeply in creation dynamics in accord with the modem way of experiencing the galactic emergence of the universe, the
shaping of the earth, the appearance of
life and of
human consciousness, and the historical sequence in
human development.
In this uniqueness of
human freedom, man's power to
shape the meaning of
life in his own image, there lies a seemingly unlimited capacity for sensing the absurdity, the futility, the ambiguities of existence, and for rejecting any unifying order in things.
It is this impingement which has
shaped the history of
human beings and thus, being beyond history, it is the most dynamic force in
human life to transform the world.
The faith of Israel, the interpretation of her historical
life in Yahwism, inevitably poses the question: If the Word of Yahweh thus creates,
shapes, and informs our
life, if the
life of Yahweh thus impinges effectively upon
human history, what is his relationship, and ours, to the wide world?
Maybe it is the grindingly long, 162 - game season, which allows for so many promising and disheartening plotlines to take
shape, only to dissolve again along the way, and which sustains even the most improbable hope past any rational span; or maybe it is simply the course of the year's seasons, from early spring into mid-autumn — nature's perennial allegory of
human life, eloquent of innocent confidence slowly transformed into wise resignation.
His
life provides an image ofauthentic
human existence, a style of
life, a norm ofintegrity and love, which
shapes our own self - understanding and action.
It is significant that Vatican II (and also the Uppsala Assembly of the World Council of Churches) defines the church as the sacramental sign of the unity of all humanity, and also speaks of the presence of the Paschal Mystery among all peoples (see Decree on the Church, and the document on the Pastoral Constitution of the Church in the Modern World) This approach assumes that in Christianity, acknowledgment of Salvation (understood as the transcendent ultimate destiny of
human beings) finds expression and witness in the universal struggle for Humanization (understood as the penultimate
human destiny) in world history which is
shaped not only by the forces of goodness and
life, but also by the forces of evil and death.
In making this judgment they were
shaped, as all Christians are, by the intellectual tradition centered on the question, «What is the best
life for a
human being?
They have much homework to do - seeking to penetrate that holy of holies of the
human spiritual universe
shaping believers»
life history and culture, the universe not visible to the naked eye and not perceptible to the mind not able to penetrate the complexity of the heart and spirit.
And, as Baillie says, the more effective it is in
shaping my
life, the more fully I'm
human, that is, the freer, stronger, more fulfilled and effective I am as a
human being.»
They see more clearly than the liberal humanists that
human devotion is
shaped in communities of faith and
life.
On the other hand,
human beings are inherently unable to
shape their
lives and societies according to religious and philosophical visions of what is just and good.