Not exact matches
Further, I think that
even what you see as limited
human logic abilities are quite robust and testable.
All of you are capable
human beings, full of reason and
logic... you've
even posted your own parameters by which one should operate.
Building on the Platonic understanding of hell as the place where unpunished violations of justice are requited, Schall argues it is the consequence of our free will («the other side of
human dignity») and of the significance of
human action, opening up trains of thought in the direction of the immortality of the soul and the resurrection of the body - and finding this all pleasurable, «
even amusing» (p. 121) in terms of
logic and reason.
CiV speaks of
human relationships coming under the «
logic of gratuitousness», [1] a gratuity which is another name for the Caritas which
even more profoundly marks all God's dealings with us.
The special
logic of this theory, after all, is that the Christian philosopher — having surmounted the «aesthetic,» «ethical,» and
even in a sense «religious» stages of
human existence — is uniquely able to enact a return, back to the things of earth, back to finitude, back to the aesthetic; having found the highest rationality of being in God's kenosis — His self - outpouring — in the Incarnation, the Christian philosopher is reconciled to the particularity of flesh and form, recognizes all of creation as a purely gratuitous gift of a God of infinite love, and is able to rejoice in the levity of a world created and redeemed purely out of God's «pleasure.»
Even if this little matter of
logic were surmountable — which it is not — and we were to admit that it is possible for Jesus, a
human being, to be fully divine, we would still have to point out that he would not be fully
human in the same sense as you and I.
You actually think you are indeed special because of «
logic» yet scientists do the work for you while you just believe what they say.But not
even the most smartest
human to walk the planet disproved anything.
For Novak, however, nothing could be more disastrous for Judaism than to admit Socrates, Plato, the Stoics, Grotius, and Kant into the operative
logic of Jewish jurisprudence, for not only did the ancient advocates of natural law such as Plato and the Stoics lack a doctrine of creation, but
even Grotius and Kant» devout monotheists though they were» imported a false philosophy into God's sovereign dealings with the
human race:
To accept
even the right of self «defense, as the Pope does, is to accept the all «too «
human logic of worldly power structures and to ignore the decisive victory of the Lamb.
God makes the rules and we are left to figure them out
even if they defy our ability to apply common sense thinking or
human logic.
And whereas the rest of the biological sciences can safely hide behind the behaviourist
logic that we can never know what another organism,
human or otherwise, is consciously experiencing,
even asking a question about animal welfare forces us to conclude that we must at least try to find out.
The reason that
even adult
humans pause during that game is that the rules slide:
Logic holds that if Rock beats Scissors, and Scissors beats Paper, then Rock should also beat Paper.
But it will provide remarkable vindication of the power of
human imagination, combined with rigorous
logic and technological know - how, to uncover hidden worlds that
even half a century ago could not have been conceived.
Even though no other animal consumes the milk of another species (except through
human hands), Griffiths says if we were to apply that
logic to everything that
humans do that other animals don't — including eating honey and eggs — we would find there are very few things we could call natural.
The bad dialogue and shameless product placement are to be expected, and the dynamic between the three lead
human characters is pretty annoying, but Bay can't
even get the action right in this one, settling for unintelligible set pieces that evade
logic almost as much as the story.
For unlike Andre's floor sculptures, which are fashioned from the strictly impersonal
logic of the grid, Steegmann Mangrané's are drawn, cut and organised according to a
logic that not only defies the grid, but
even immediate
human understanding (although this particular perversion of the grid evolved from a drawing featured in the Morfogenesis — Cripsis presentation mentioned above), transforming it into something if not more natural, then less inclined to impose order at the expense of the natural, while casting doubt upon what we traditionally assume to be natural.
This element and its
logic grow more relevant and recurrent during the period in which European surrealismchoosess the double as a manifestation of the merchandise /
human objectification fetish pairing to put forth its critique of capitalism,
even as it surrenders to this ambiguity of contemporary living.
The
logic is, it's
even a greater waste of time to look for a
human signal in corrupted data.
The
logic is clear: If the Earth has already warmed more than we thought due to
human activities, then there's
even less remaining carbon dioxide that we can emit and still avoid 2 degrees of warming.