The dogma of Double Predestination is a product of
human logic which can - not withstand the a-logical teaching of the Scripture.
Not exact matches
... well the same
logic applys to god... i enjoy dropping these
logic bombs on people and see how they react and hope that maybe that
logic bomb will eventually set up a chain reaction in their consciousness... or maybe I am an egotistical f c k who just likes to have an unassaiable argument
which with to beat others over the head with... maybe I am wrong to do so because the
Human Condition is so cold and bleak in its finality that people need the cushion of god to go on with their everyday lives.
All of you are capable
human beings, full of reason and
logic... you've even posted your own parameters by
which one should operate.
CiV speaks of
human relationships coming under the «
logic of gratuitousness», [1] a gratuity
which is another name for the Caritas
which even more profoundly marks all God's dealings with us.
Fortunately life is more than
logic, and modern predestinarians like their Calvinistic forebears are seldom consistent if the issue is one in
which human responsibility is clearly evident.
His own pet proof of «why there almost certainly is no God» (a proof in
which he takes much evident pride) is one that a usually mild - spoken friend of mine (a friend who has devoted too much of his life to teaching undergraduates the basic rules of
logic and the elementary language of philosophy) has described as «possibly the single most incompetent logical argument ever made for or against anything in the whole history of the
human race.»
It's only exclusion when you try to turn atheism into this dogmatic struggle with any form of monotheism, with the same ridiculous notions of superiority based on
human thinking and
logic which are always proven wrong.
Even if this little matter of
logic were surmountable —
which it is not — and we were to admit that it is possible for Jesus, a
human being, to be fully divine, we would still have to point out that he would not be fully
human in the same sense as you and I.
This is a sad fact of
which we are all aware, and because of this separation of head and heart we are bound to conclude that, however social necessity and
logic may impel it from behind, the
human mass will only become thoroughly unified under the influence of some form of affective energy
which will place the
human particles in the happy position of being unable to love and fulfill themselves individually except by contributing in some degree to the love and fulfillment of all; to the extent, that is to say, that all are equal and integral parts of a single universe that is vitally converging.
All we can manage is to develop principles and «how - to's»
which causes us to rely on
logic and
human perception, when Prov.
But the defender of oxymorons can point out that
human beings sometimes have experiences
which can not be properly described through a
logic of exclusion.
It is a
logic which, as we shall see, moves us in the course of the biblical narrative from creation to history, from first things to
human politics.
Also known as «contrarian» betting, the
logic behind fading the public is quite simple: It's
human nature to root for winners and scoring,
which is why we typically see the public pounding favorites and overs.
This knowledge could play an important role in the design of future vaccination campaigns, but also highlights a deeper evolutionary
logic which modern
humans sometimes are governed by: as social beings, in the right circumstances, we can afford to take into account a broader societal context, but when we get the chance to invest in the evolutionary «core values» (survival and procreation) the larger context is easily forgotten.
These experi - ments reveal insights on petrogenesis, the geo -
logic history of rocks,
which will ultimately help scientists determine whether
humans will be able to live on planets like Mars in the future.
The irrational, the
human nostalgia, and the absurd that is born of their encounter - these are the three characters in the drama that must necessarily end with all the
logic of
which an existence is capable
The AI is developed with fuzzy
logic concept,
which in short is a way of imitating
human decision making.
Now, that same
logic is being applied to Final Fantasy's creatures, several of
which are nearly as recognizable as their
human protagonists.
With titles like Veil of Faith, Veil of Love's Pleasure and Veil of
Logic, Hirst makes it clear that each work tackles a vast, complex, overarching presence within the
human existence; presences
which many choose to believe provide clarity, but
which really continuously baffle and bewilder.
For unlike Andre's floor sculptures,
which are fashioned from the strictly impersonal
logic of the grid, Steegmann Mangrané's are drawn, cut and organised according to a
logic that not only defies the grid, but even immediate
human understanding (although this particular perversion of the grid evolved from a drawing featured in the Morfogenesis — Cripsis presentation mentioned above), transforming it into something if not more natural, then less inclined to impose order at the expense of the natural, while casting doubt upon what we traditionally assume to be natural.
Annabel Osberg of the Huffington Post describes Honarvar's work as presenting «the
human body at the center of microcosmic theaters of dichotomy in
which irrationality permeates
logic, serenity belies violence, and luxury secretes exploitation.»
This element and its
logic grow more relevant and recurrent during the period in
which European surrealismchoosess the double as a manifestation of the merchandise /
human objectification fetish pairing to put forth its critique of capitalism, even as it surrenders to this ambiguity of contemporary living.
Annabel Osberg of the Huffington Post perfectly describes Honarvar's work as presenting the
human body at the center of microcosmic theaters of dichotomy in
which irrationality permeates
logic, serenity belies violence, and luxury secretes exploitation.
So is his remark, «
Human beings, in their thinking, feeling and acting are not free but just as causally bound as the stars in their motion»,
which reduces
logic and mathematics to causal effects of physical forces, and his first quote to «As far as the laws of physics refer to physical reality, they are not certain; and as far as they are certain, they do not refer to physical reality.»
Both require assumptions of truth or falsity with no accounting for the actual allegation made,
which defies
logic and
human experience.
Industry studies have shown that with the right training, predictive coding achieves better and more cost - effective results than traditional, Boolean
logic - based eDiscovery,
which requires
humans to give detailed, specifically structured instruction sets for searches.
In most cases, insurance companies use software as opposed to actual
human logic to calculate these factors,
which is why subjective factors are difficult to weigh.
One of the most important projects
humans can pursue is — as Jeff Bezos has argued and committed billions to — to use the resources of space (
which are approximately ALL resources in the solar system) to alleviate earth's problems, and the
logic of energy and population growth is to shift towards heavy manufacturing in space while Earth is «zoned residential and light industrial».
Buying and selling anything is an emotional experience, to
which we
humans secondly apply
logic to justify our primary emotional decision.