Sentences with phrase «human one at»

As of last year, Google's Cloud Vision AI was as good as or better than a human at recognizing the contents of images (so was Microsoft's AI for that matter).

Zuckerberg responded that current AI technology is not as good as humans at screening «sensitive content when the stakes are pretty high.»

Parking by a self - driving car — without a human at the wheel — is a complex problem that researchers at virtually all car makers are trying to solve.

Context — e.g., who said what and why, when they said it, who they know, how often they engage in conversation — is difficult even for humans at times.

But the research obviously raises some important concerns about the Louisiana judicial system specifically, as well as how to better manage the emotional humans at the helm of any major system.

«We are not pursuing A.I. to beat humans at games,» said Nadella, taking a subtle hit at competitors like Google and IBM, whose A.I. technologies got some attention for beating humans at the ancient Chinese board game Go and on the game show Jeopardy.

AI seems to have figured out other, less difficult versions of poker — AI technology from the University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada, beat humans at Head's Up Limited Hold «Em, for example.

The victory over the world's top player — which many thought would take decades to achieve — underlines the potential of artificial intelligence to take on humans at complex tasks.

Many researchers say automation will replace humans at a faster clip than humans will be able to create and train for new jobs.

That, after all, is how it created its revolutionary Watson system that beat humans at Jeopardy and is now assisting professional in fields ranging from medicine, finance and even music.

By drastically decreasing the time taken to complete transactions — in some cases from days to minutes — the collaboration between software robots and humans at Telefonica has been credited with a significant decrease in call - center queries and improved customer satisfaction.

We may never learn what Simons» algorithms actually are, but we do accept that computers can outperform humans at quantitative tasks.

Given the scale of our universe, it seems likely that god wouldn't be interested in humans at all, and his design would be so far beyond our imagining, so why care about humans?

By extension, evolving from less advanced life forms is distasteful to those same individuals, as that necessitates a point in evolution at which humans are not really humans at all in the modern sense, which then brings up problems such as «do slugs go to heaven?»

Humans as constantly evolving and jesus addressed the sins of all humans at the time.

Not to mention where demons live (and remember, they don't like humans at all).

Consequently one feels less inclined to reject as unscientific the idea that the critical point of planetary reflective consciousness which is the result of the forming of humanity into an organized society, far from being a mere spark in the darkness, corresponds on the contrary to our passage (by a movement of reversal or dematerialization) to another face of the universe: not an ending of the ultra-human but its arrival at something trans - human at the very heart of reality.

Christians have most often been content to allow Western culture to shape their understanding of the human at play.

Facts: This God didn't know how the universe was actually created, it didn't recognize any physical feature of the universe or form of life unknown to humans at the time (no galaxies, no microorganisms, etc.).

But there is a rational and proper hierarchy of life with humans at its apex.

Even though the law says you are a human at 24 weeks that doesn't mean Christians have to stop growing up at that age...

The Blake who declares that God is Jesus (Laocoon engraving) is the Blake who envisioned an experience that is totally fallen and totally human at once.

You will find many social behaviors are not unique to humans at all, there are parallels throughout the animal, and insect kingdooms.

I can't even get a human at the DVM when I call....

So the soul is human at one level and simultaneously personal or self at another level.

Marx, they observe, thought people would remain human at the end of history — self - conscious, mortal, free choosers.

This was Jesus and he was come unto the Earth to save humans at long last.

Rather than ground their discussion in biblical reflection and careful observation of play itself, Christians have most often been content to allow Western culture to shape their understanding of the human at play.

They note that the global population of humans at the start of that year is estimated to be 536,870,911.

And, in fact, I am wondering these days why He created humans at all.

Is it even conceivable that we would remove his life - support system on the ground that his existence, like that of the fetus, is highly inconvenient to us and that he does not look human at the moment?

You mean the sooner you can cease being human at all, and forever... Not to worry, the fairy story will soon end.

It is rather the next stage in the evolutionary advance on the planet Earth of overwhelming importance to us humans at this time, but perhaps only one among myriads given God's creative activity on other worlds.

I laughed, I cried, and I felt a little more understood, a little more connected to life, a little more human at the end.

I did make the point that life begins at conception, and that there is no ground of principle on which the embryo or fetus could be regarded as anything less than human at any stage of its existence.

A person who would hold this view believes that while God guided and inspired the human authors to accurately record the events of history, these events do not accurately represent the mind or will of God, but rather what the humans at that time thought was the mind and will of God.

It is very easy, and quite false, to interpret the person of Jesus docetically: that is, to suppose that he is God walking about this earth got up to look like a man but not in fact truly human at all.

ot what defines a human at all..

A discussion of the proper use of the philosophical category of ontology would take us too far afield here, but for now let us consider humans at the three basic levels of being.

They are so wicked and immoral that you can't even tell that they are human at times.

If you answer yes, for any of our fellow humans at any stage of their lives, can you supply a reason why some have that right and others do not?

«The presence of a «spiritual vacuum» in the soul is a common condi / tion that always puts humans at risk of demonic possession.

Jesus certainly knew of better ways of traveling than by walking (and after His resurrection, He shows one of these by appearing and disappearing at will), but as God in human flesh, He limited Himself to walking because this was the available method for most humans at that time.

Also can you please explain how it is possible to be God and human at the same time because God is powerful while humans are weak?

Summation: I reject both the view that Jesus had to learn ONLY like a human to become God and I also reject the Gnostic view that Jesus was not human at all and was completely divine at all times.

«Christians confess that Jesus is both God and human at the same time.

The brief showed that the offspring of human beings is human at every stage of its development; that the offspring undergoes no change of species; that it is a separate organism, with a genetic definition of its own, certainly not part of the body of the mother.

it is not human at that moment in time.

He does not mean that once upon a time there was a Garden of Evil («the state of nature»), the experience of which taught humans at a specific date to value civilization.

To hear glimmers of thought drift over from the humans at the picnic table to the far left, or to catch the trail end of a passionate speech from just down the grassy hill is to be let in, for a second, to someone else's world.