Sentences with phrase «human ones too»

Maybe spending a lot of time investing in a relationship with Godteaches you a thing or two about the human ones too.

Not exact matches

After several years of research, in 2011 De Brouwer launched Scanadu, a start - up he believes can be instrumental in solving one of modern health care's major flaws: that humans rely too heavily on the expertise of doctors and not nearly enough on data.

On the extremely unlikely chance you haven't already noticed, humans haven't been doing too well lately at governing just one planet.

At one point in 2005, criticism from the community that Mozilla managers were being too secretive led Baker to hold a moratorium on all corporate - only meetings for several months; it only ended when managers needed to discuss a human resources question too personal to share with everyone.

One of my bosses at Lehman was an options trader back in the «90s (and a terrific human being, too).

One of the most commonly cited concerns of automation is that it will lead to unemployment, but what if it robs us of human connectivity, too?

The outstanding example, of course, is the Chinese government's long - running «one - child policy,» replete with forced abortions, public trackings of menstrual cycles, family flight, increased female infanticide, sterilization, and other assaults too numerous even to begin cataloguing here — in fact, so numerous that they are now widely, if often grudgingly, acknowledged as wrongs even by international human - rights bureaucracies.

However, the typical Christian Eternal All - knowing Trinity God who happens to also have a personal interest in what you do in the bedroom just seems too ridiculous to be anything but a human construct, and a jerry - built one at that.

Granting that inequalities of potential exist in human individuals, these inequalities are too slight and too subject to change (i.e., neither extreme nor enduring) to conclude that the maximal happiness of one group is coincident with the maximal importance of the rest.

And so we too, daily engaged in our own all too human journey, searching for that which would have us be so much more than we are, and bearing our unworthy gifts, kneel on the stable floor beside these royal ones, worshiping with them the child who is most royal.

We think not only of objects as self - contained in particular regions of space and related to one another only externally, but we think of human selves that way, too.

In that sustained religious allegory of moral heroism and imagery both vivid and frightening, the reader lives through Christian's travails and all - too - human backsliding, until finally tasting his victory as one's own.

Jesus Christ is the «Elect One,» not by some effort of human nature alone, for that would not be real election, but by God's eternal purpose which «from the beginning of the world» — and long before it, too, if we may so speak — has determined that «in the fullness of the times» there shall be just such an actualization of the potential God - Man relationship as Christian faith discerns in Christ our Lord.

Oh, the Calvinists could make perfect sense of it all with a wave of a hand and a swift, confident explanation about how Zarmina had been born in sin and likely predestined to spend eternity in hell to the glory of an angry God (they called her a «vessel of destruction»); about how I should just be thankful to be spared the same fate since it's what I deserve anyway; about how the Asian tsunami was just another one of God's temper tantrums sent to remind us all of His rage at our sin; about how I need not worry because «there is not one maverick molecule in the universe» so every hurricane, every earthquake, every war, every execution, every transaction in the slave trade, every rape of a child is part of God's sovereign plan, even God's idea; about how my objections to this paradigm represented unrepentant pride and a capitulation to humanism that placed too much inherent value on my fellow human beings; about how my intuitive sense of love and morality and right and wrong is so corrupted by my sin nature I can not trust it.

The human creation too is governed by a kind of natural law, but it is one that can be violated.

Stephen Fry speaking about atheists: «The glory — anything — we take credit for what is great about man and we take blame for what is dreadful about man, we neither grovel or apologise at the feet of a god, or are so infantile as to project the idea that we once had a father as human beings and we therefore should have a divine one too.

One thing that has been proven time and again.; Religion breeds hatred, control and human destruction (yes, natzi's too were religious.

Too great an attachment to the datum self as a methodological starting point commits one unwittingly to solipsism, Hartshorne holds, since one could never achieve a sound epistemological basis for inferring the existence of anything beyond the datum self by this method.31 Further, if it is true that human beings are social all the way down, resistance to a literal participation in the being of a person by others (including their literal purposes) is also a form of impersonalism, according to Hartshorne's analysis — a charge from which Brightman would have reeled, had he realized that this was Hartshorne's implication.

One of the many virtues of Larsen's study is its revealing of the «all too human» character of the scholarship of the anthropologists he examines.

The Universe is too vast and too incredible for this theory of one little Human - centered god to be real.

First, he seemed to assume too quickly the virtue of the capitalistic system and one of its foundational presuppositions the goodness of private property - over against the Marxist contention that money is one objectivation of human alienation.

And we were designed by God, not Steve Jobs, for human bodies to work well produce sperms and eggs both needed from two different humans to create one, and be creative too like God is and make iPhones.

One fundamentalist pastor I interviewed some time ago said he was much in favor of the study of biblical theology, but opposed the study of systematic theology because the latter presupposed too much about human wisdom.

They have moved beyond religious frontiers to the frontier — which no thinker, however, brilliant can ever cross — to the meeting place of the human with the Divine where we find ourselves like Job speaking of things we do not understand, of things too wonderful for us to know and where, in God's mercy, we may experience the reality of the One God whose glory passes our understanding.

His own pet proof of «why there almost certainly is no God» (a proof in which he takes much evident pride) is one that a usually mild - spoken friend of mine (a friend who has devoted too much of his life to teaching undergraduates the basic rules of logic and the elementary language of philosophy) has described as «possibly the single most incompetent logical argument ever made for or against anything in the whole history of the human race.»

He was too much of a human being to live alone, and three years after he went to Union he married one of his students, a bright, elegant Briton.

Augustine and Aquinas, of course, do argue for a plan in history and for a human end of happiness — and for the reality, if one is not too squeamish to use the word, of heaven.

To assume that we could have such a chart is to presume too much: it is to be guilty of that libido sciendi «lust for knowing», which Jacques Maritain quite rightly has condemned as one of the worst manifestations of human sinfulness.

However, the secular worldview entails the loss of one more aspect of human existence that is simply too much to bear.

If we were right in stating that truth can only be one and that ultimately the knowledge of truth must be unified, too, consistence and coherence with what has been revealed in the course of human history can not count for nothing.

Indeed, and one thinks of the catastrophic threat posed by our all - too - human anger, bitterness, greed, lust, and will to power.

So comparatively to Wolfe and Percy, the agrarians appear as a relic and perhaps (at least in some cases) too one - sided in their «phenomenological» descriptions of the way that the problems and the possibilities for human goodness if not greatness appear today.

It hardly needs to be said that no one has been able to come up with a criterion that makes babies in the womb less human but leaves everyone else as he was; the teeth of the moral gears are too finely set for that.

A strong case has been made by F. J. E. Woodbridge that Plato not only does not seriously regard his «perfect state» as realizable, but that he means to make us see the error of imposing perfection too rigorously on human fallibility.3 Edward Bellamy's Looking Backward illustrates the utopia which becomes a persuasive call to radical social reforms.4 It also illustrates one of the functions of utopian thought as a medium of realistic criticism of the present.

We human beings too are always a living and a causal part of that one «creation in community» for better or worse, for good or for degradation, (cf Col 1, 16 - 26.

Too much recent theology has been one - sided in its emphasis on the historical setting of human existence, neglecting to relate in any organic way the natural foundation of man's spirit to the framework of the divine activity.

A one - size - fits - all label seems to simplify a difficult matter, but it simplifies too much by simply removing a whole category of persons from the human care list.

One of the pharmacologists who developed Prozac, the drug in question, put it this way: «If the human brain were simple enough to understand, we would be too simple to understand it.»

Orwell thinks that from Shakespeare's writings it would be difficult to know that he had any religion» whereas in fact the placing of truth in the mouths of babes is one aspect of the Christian respect for all human life; that same profound feeling is what inspires us to protest loudly when health authorities take a mental defective off dialysis machine because they consider his «quality of life» too low, in defiance of Christ's words in the Sermon on the Mount.

I take it very seriously too: as one of the most dangerous threats to human civilization in existence, behind the Koran and, perhaps, Mein Kampf.

There is a right and proper fear; it is awe or reverence toward God — and love does not cast that out, for men must worship and adore, in all reverence and awe, the holy Lover who is God; while true love respects the mystery and wonder in the Other (and also in the human beloved one, too).

This notion requires much more elaboration, but the main point is that the «image of God» is not an uncorrupted one in human nature as it actually exists, and this fact prevents us from taking too sanguine a view of our divinely given, unique powers.

they are too into themselves to take care of another person... look out for number one... that's what they do... so sad when people reduce the human baby (ok fetus) to nothing but a pest and an annoyance to another persons life

I would not for a minute wish to deny that we are too often motivated by an obsessive desire for power and control, and dominated by a narrow and calculating rationality which can not even acknowledge the deeper values of human life and experience, and that such attitudes may contribute to the coming of one form or another of global catastrophe.

One of my favorite quotes is by Archbishop Desmond Tutu, a man who knew of the coexistence of joy and pain all too well as he encouraged South Africans in their struggle for human rights.

Religion either presents a a too negative, despairing and hopeless belief in human nature, or a too optimistic, positive and rosy one.

@NII YOU SOUND LIKE YOU ARE GUILTY AND TALKED ABOUT OTHER FALSEHOOD RELIGION YOU DID NOT LIKE OR UNDERSTAND WHEN YOU WAS LITTLE CHILD OR YOUNGER ADULT OR MID LIFE PERSON.THERE ARE THOUSANDS OF GLOBAL FALSEHOOD RELIGIONS.BUT THIS ONE THING DOES NOT LIE (DNA) Y CHROMOSOME EVEN TOP SUPER SMART BLOND HEAD BLUE EYE PALE SKIN SUPER DNA RESEARCH PROFESSIONALS WITH MULTIPLE PHD DEGREES FROM NORWAY SWEDEN AND FINLAND DENMARK ETC KNOW THAT THE Y CHROMOSOME ALSO KNOWN AS THE ADAM Y CHROMOSOME CAMED OUT OF EAST AFRICA.falsehood religion did not make.the human race WISDOM DID WISDOM WALKED AND TALKED WITH MAN IT WAS WISDOM THAT MADE ADAM AND EVE.THINK ABOUT IT @NII NOW THE MOST DOMINANT DNA BELONGS TOO BLACK PEOPLE NOT EUROPEANS.LOOK AT ALL YOUR MIXED RACE BLACK PEOPLE»S TIGER WOOD»S HALLEY BERRY LENNY KRAVITZ LISA BONET ETC DNA DO NT LIE man made falsehood religion do lie

But the churches have also made too little of explicit sexual behavior because they have failed to see that here is one of the basic vitalities of human existence and therefore an important clue to the deepest drive in the cosmos toward what Teilhard de Chardin called «amorization.»

In gentle characters, where devoutness is intense and the intellect feeble, we have an imaginative absorption in the love of God to the exclusion of all practical human interests, which, though innocent enough, is too one - sided to be admirable.

One of the difficulties in much that has been written or said about human sexuality is that it has been altogether too much based upon what Mr. Woollard calls a «secular kind of pragmatism.»