Sentences with phrase «human opponents»

The phrase "human opponents" refers to people who compete or play against each other in a game or competition, rather than facing computers or artificial intelligence. Full definition
Playing against human opponents naturally offers a different type of challenge, but there's nothing here that hasn't been done in other recent iterations in the series.
It actually resembles the single player game, but with human opponents instead of AI.
The game itself is fine and could be exciting when played against a full compliment of human opponents but that's a guarantee the game can't make.
Play against the computer or against other human opponents via a split - screen display.
Sure, the variety of the gameplay shows in the career mode, but against real human opponents is where the different play styles between vehicles becomes very apparent.
As well as avoiding various environmental dangers you must compete against up to 3 AI or human opponents for these items.
Probably the most popular genre in gaming, shooters are more complicated than you think, especially when you play versus human opponents.
As above, the game will automatically start a game with bots if it can't find human opponents, so you could begin a multiplayer match with three bots.
Throughout the game, you'll go head - to - head with a number of powerful fellow hunters, human opponents who have the same types of weapons and skills you do.
It's a neat idea that can be effective when playing alone, but most human opponents seem to know to just get away when you pop into rage.
Plenty of fun there with a live human opponent!
Luckily, aside from local vs. play, the presence of an online mode where you can challenge sound - thinking human opponents is available.
Fight quick casual matches online against random human opponents, without having to search for a lobby.
Still, they can't make up for experience, tension and fun when the murder game is played with human opponents.
The split screen matches against bots are a lot tougher than expected, but are still predictable and will not give the same experience as playing against human opponents.
Think about that; all the gamers out there with no interest in fighting against other human opponents in fear of getting slaughtered or hearing nonsense over their headset can basically raise their rank and perks in little snippets that play like the campaign.
Much of these faults vanish to the back of your mind when battling human opponents, though.
The competitive side of things delivers just a few bland maps on which to do combat, the fantastic feedback of shooting robots being replaced by human opponents who absorb bullets like a bloody sponge.
If you're willing to re-learn your timing, online can be a source for even more fun time with the saints just for the added excitement of fighting human opponents.
Already the lack of any online mode sabotages what could have been DiscStorm's greatest strength, at least these matches may be enjoyed with bots though this will always pale to the challenge that comes with facing human opponents.
While I did do this with the Windows 95 Monopoly every once in a while, playing against actual human opponents online and competing in the leaderboards adds so much more incentive to go back to it than just facing AI over and over again.
Guns don't really appear until nearly halfway through the main campaign and you don't really want to use them on the streets since they attract the quicker Viral types of undead, but occasionally a rifle becomes a necessity when up against similarly - armed human opponents in the latter half of Dying Light.
That is now a thing of the past, as human opponents make mistakes, don't travel on rails and there is a penalty for unsociable driving.
The A.I. could be adjusted a little bit to resemble a actual human opponent more.
This is actually how both stories play out, the only real difference being that the fantasy story replaces human opponents with all manner of monsters, from ghosts and goblins to griffins and giants.
He can cloak himself in a transparent camouflage and make himself look like human opponents to easily sneak in and kill the human enemies.
In the end, any gameplay instance that isn't shared with other human opponents feels like a stopgap to a main attraction that likely won't happen often enough for most.
Pass the chequered flag, either online or offline, and after a few seconds you'll be teleported to your pit box — watching as AI or human opponents pop into existence behind you.
As usual the game tries to mix things up with a range of deranged human opponents and boss - like «psychos» but the culture shock of coming up against an enemy that actually presents a challenge is often jarring, and humans encountered elsewhere on the map seem as curiously resistant to damage as the zombies are prone to it.
Once you have worked you way through the stories of a few of the characters and gotten comfortable with the new combat system, you will have to try your skills against other human opponents across the globe.
The top AI players are pretty decent at what they do, but if you're a word puzzle aficionado you'll probably want to play against human opponents if you want to be challenged.
Absent human opponents, Rocket League stops being a simple game with a lot of nuance, and transforms into quite a dull slog, full of repetition, even though the matches are only five minutes long.
Taking on AI enemies and clearing out nests of terrorists is pretty dang fun at first but the novelty wears off after a while and I found myself returning to standard multiplayer for the satisfaction of playing against human opponents before too long.
Human opponents finally make their debut in Dead Space.
As the players get more skilled, the dinos are really more of a nuisance to be done away with while duking it out with the far more dangerous human opponents.
The interesting thing now is that due to the increased server size you're likely to face human opponents pretty regularly (both on normal and special sorties).
All this makes for a welcome addition as playing against human opponents always feel way fairer than the harder AI options.
While this makes sense where the infected are concerned (they're basically being controlled by malevolent fungus, after all), it gets a bit jarring to see supposedly - intelligent human opponents blindly rush to their deaths, or conveniently forget that they had a friend nearby not a minute ago.
Solo play can get repetitive, the bane of all titles of this ilk, but an aggressively competitive AI makes for a more than worthy challenge to hone your skill for the next human opponent.
Quar: Battle for Gate 18 «s tactical gameplay — from unit selection to battlefield improvisation — seems perfect for going head - to - head against competitive human opponents.
It loses a little of Titanfall's DNA without the extra mayhem generated by A.I. combatants, but I can see why some players will prefer only challenging human opponents.
If the future for librarians is to enhance technology skill sets, even coding, in order to operate or merge (in a manner of speaking) with AIs (the term «centaur» is a thing in chess where humans use AI recommendations for play to beat pure AI or pure human opponents), then maybe «information scientist» is looking more relevant.
Grunt kills are similar to the sensation of a player feeling proficient at a FPS» single player campaign but overwhelmed by the unpredictability of human opponents in multiplayer.
For those looking for some multiplayer mayhem with real human opponents, Virtua Tennis 4 offers up some of this as well.
In addition to the events found in the singleplayer, now enhanced by human opponents; there are several new challenges thrown into the mix.
Create your own lobby or join other lobbies to fight human opponents.

Phrases with «human opponents»

a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z