Berger's answer is that religion has no monopoly on morality, as morality is grounded in
human perception rather than norms (i.e., good and bad).
Not exact matches
The correlate myth,
rather, draws
perception toward O'Flaherty's hub, the center of
human characterization.
Buchler's theory of
perception and judgment articulates, in a descriptive sense, what is categorically distinctive of
human nature, or
rather for Buchler,
human process.
But here again we are talking about
human perception of God,
rather than God.
The «resource turn» in egalitarian political philosophy, and the prioritisation within practical welfarism of resource redistribution by the nation - state, implicitly buy into the same impoverished view of
human motivation — they abandon positions from which they could criticise the neoliberal
perception of
human behaviour, and serve to perpetuate its dominance
rather than providing alternatives to undermine it.
«This means that a
human being has a
rather diffuse
perception, saying that something is there and that this might involve danger,» Christian Koch says.
It's tough to say, but it feels like their C - character status in the film is informed by the public's
perception of the group
rather than their value as
human beings in the five - way friendship.
There are likely other causes for this failure of
human perception, intellectual integrity and moral courage, but I would like to ask the Dot Earth community to consider one
rather obvious failing.
In simple terms, we know that public
perceptions are favorable when there is familiarity, involvement in decision making process, and when scales involved are
human rather than industrial.
It is the lack of a strong challenge by the UK Senior judiciary to Strasbourg decisions which gives the
perception of subservience to Europe, even the misconceived view of loss of Parliamentary Sovereignty,
rather than the dominance of the
Human Rights Act, the ECHR or even the Strasbourg Judiciary.