These lenses help you find a unique,
human perspective on things that interest you.»
Not exact matches
The author (s) of this story lacked
perspective on their calendar, or maybe they wanted to debunk astronomical principles of order in favor of making the statement that God made all that is in the universe in one «work» week a nice juxtaposition between divine and
human potential to get
things done.
Jesus has already pointed out what is wrong with the disciples»
perspective — they have set their minds
on things human rather than divine (Mark 8:33).
Humans disagree
on various
things in everyday life because people have different
perspectives on a wide array of topics.
From my
perspective then, according to your definition of «love», most if not all religions are anti-love given their violent history and ability to divide
human beings based
on things that should not divide people to begin with.
By its stress
on event and
on patterning and integration, by its insistence that relationships constitute an entity, by its concern for an awareness of the depths of
human experience (motivations, desires, drives, and «emotional intensity,» for example), as well as by its recognition that we are part of the world and continuous with what has gone before us and even now surrounds and affects us, process thought not only has been in agreement with the newer scientific emphasis
on «wholeness,» but has also contributed a
perspective which can give that emphasis a meaningful setting and a context in the structure of
things in a dynamic universe.
And so in an important sense there's no such
thing as the
human mind, which an evolutionary
perspective on will illuminate us about, but rather there are a variety of different kinds of minds out there, all of which have evolved, and in many cases the variety of kinds of minds are maintained by frequency dependent selection.
I don't think there are any «bad guys» in the book, just some poor choices made
on the basis of imperfect information or
perspective (i.e. the lot of the standard - issue
human)... I didn't want there to be any «safe place» in the book where the reader could relax and say, «I'm completely sure of what the right
thing to do is here.»