Sentences with phrase «human production of»

What would be the impact if suddenly the earth was devoid of all humans, thus eliminating the human production of GHGs.

Polar bears became victims and poster animals for destructive human production of CO2.

This is more than 100 times the yearly increase of human production, which strongly suggests that the dynamics of the natural short - term sequestration processes can cope easily with the human production of CO2.»

If you look at the nearly linear increase of Mauna Loa CO2 you are persuaded that only a steady source like human production of CO2 can explain that.

The discovery could have been made years earlier if scientists had been more on the lookout for ways that human production of a small amount of obscure chemicals could ravage the atmosphere.

They required a prediction to show it was essential to stop the human production of CO2.

I'm probably one of those conspiracy wing nuts for wondering if it because human production of CH4 is swamped by natural production.

Politics has made that period, which covers the Industrial Revolution, of climatic interest as people wanted to prove that human production of CO2 was causing warming.

They argued that human production of sulfates blocked sunlight and caused the cooling.

Rather, the alarmists are still trying to convince an increasingly skeptical public that human production of carbon dioxide will soon lead to runaway global warming and climate catastrophe.

It was a big problem because during that post war period human production of CO2 increased the most.

My personal views are: (1) Yes, it is true that increasing greenhouse gas concentrations will tend to warm the Earth's surface and atmosphere; (2) Yes, human production of CO2 is producing significant increases in CO2 concentration; (3) The rates of change of temperature in the previous two millennia are uncertain because proxies have been misapplied by the hockey stick crowd.

«Climate science» as it is used by warmists implies adherence to a set of beliefs: (1) Increasing greenhouse gas concentrations will warm the Earth's surface and atmosphere; (2) Human production of CO2 is producing significant increases in CO2 concentration; (3) The rate of rise of temperature in the 20th and 21st centuries is unprecedented compared to the rates of change of temperature in the previous two millennia and this can only be due to rising greenhouse gas concentrations; (4) The climate of the 19th century was ideal and may be taken as a standard to compare against any current climate; (5) global climate models, while still not perfect, are good enough to indicate that continued use of fossil fuels at projected rates in the 21st century will cause the CO2 concentration to rise to a high level by 2100 (possibly 700 to 900 ppm); (6) The global average temperature under this condition will rise more than 3 °C from the late 19th century ideal; (7) The negative impact on humanity of such a rise will be enormous; (8) The only alternative to such a disaster is to immediately and sharply reduce CO2 emissions (reducing emissions in 2050 by 80 % compared to today's rate) and continue further reductions after 2050; (9) Even with such draconian CO2 reductions, the CO2 concentration is likely to reach at least 450 to 500 ppm by 2100 resulting in significant damage to humanity; (10) Such reductions in CO2 emissions are technically feasible and economically affordable while providing adequate energy to a growing world population that is increasingly industrializing.

In the twentieth century temperature increased the most from 1900 to 1950 but human production of CO2 was lower.

The IPCC said it was due to human production of CO2.

This, by default, narrows the focus on human production of CO2 as the cause of change.

And to maintain or slightly increase planetary temperature is also very much a global good if — as Ruddiman and other scientists assert — the human production of greenhouse gases is helping to hold our planetary environment in its historic, benignly warm, interglacial mode.»

Most climate hobgoblins in Canada come through the Federal Government, particularly Environment Canada (EC) with the singular objective of proving the hypothesis that human production of CO2 is causing global warming.

More than 31,000 scientists across the US, «including more than 9,000 PhD.s in fields such as atmospheric science, climatology, Earth science, environment and dozens of other specialties, have signed a petition rejecting «global warming,» the assumption that the human production of greenhouse gases is damaging Earth's climate.

«Mr. Gore's Movie has Claims no Informed Expert Endorses» By Bob Unruh More than 31,000 scientists across the US, «including more than 9,000 PhD.s in fields such as atmospheric science, climatology, Earth science, environment and dozens of other specialties, have signed a petition rejecting «global warming,» the assumption that the human production of greenhouse -LSB-...]

Great but even if you completely converted all primary Aluminum production to this process, that would only reduce the current annual human production of CO2 by about 0.25 %!

Despite the paucity of proof for past climate claims, the third IPCC report says that «new evidence» makes it likely that «most of the warming observed over the last 50 years» comes from the human production of greenhouse gases.

(24 million tons CO2) Total world human production of CO2 annually is about 10 billion tons.

A major challenge was the cooling period from 1940 to 1980 because it coincided with the greatest increase in human production of CO2.

Manipulation of global temperature data to prop up claims of current global temperatures being the warmest on record due to human production of CO2 continue.

This is more than 100 times the yearly increase of human production, which strongly suggests that the dynamics of the rapid natural sequestration processes can easily cope with the human production of CO2 at each of the observed locations.

Please explain how the environment can tell the difference between human production of CO2 at 385 ppm vs non-human sources of CO2 at 3000 or more PPM?

They claim that economic activity is the key to human production of CO2, which causes warming.

Maurice Strong's quote that it is our responsibility to get rid of the industrialized nations became the idea that global warming due to human production of CO2 was an ideal vehicle to achieve that goal.

But the evidence shows this can't be true; temperature changes before CO2 in every record of any duration for any time period; CO2 variability does not correlate with temperature at any point in the last 600 million years; atmospheric CO2 levels are currently at the lowest level in that period; in the 20th century most warming occurred before 1940 when human production of CO2 was very small; human production of CO2 increased the most after 1940 but global temperatures declined to 1985; from 2000 global temperatures declined while CO2 levels increased; and any reduction in CO2 threatens plant life, oxygen production, and therefore all life on the planet.

It makes the most preposterous claim imaginable — that human production of CO2 has overridden all natural forces for the last 50 years.

There is no reason to limit human production of CO2, CH4, and other minor green house gases as has been proposed.

Natural human production of progesterone is 20 - 25 mg / day (http://www.drlam.com/articles/progesterone.asp).

Human production of plastics is a well - known environmental concern, but few studies have studied the effects of tiny plastic particles, known as nanoplastic particles.

Not exact matches

Romet has implemented a number of highly formalized processes, like daily planning and production meetings, and weekly staff reviews and human resource updates.

«A large part of the violence has taken place in this part of the country... is generated by the production of opium poppies,» Roberto Campa, the deputy interior minister for human rights, told AFP in February.

First Cobalt says the acquisition will help it position itself as a North American - focused cobalt company, as buyers of the metal look to diversify from a widespread reliance on production in the Democratic Republic of the Congo where human rights groups have raised concerns of child labour in mining operations.

This is content production in the age of algorithmic discovery — even if you're a human, you have to end up impersonating the machine.

Start with production: there certainly was a point in human history when economic power was derived through the control of resources and the production of scarce goods:

While protein products developed by these companies are not currently fit for human consumption, methane - based proteins could improve the environmental impact of meat production, and eventually further fuel the meatless revolution by creating another food source for developing economies in Africa and Asia.

The paramount crime issue in the source zone is the production of illicit narcotics, followed by money laundering, alien smuggling, illegal weapons trafficking, and human trafficking.

In October 2016, Tesla announced that all vehicles in production, as well as the forthcoming Model 3, will be built with an updated hardware suite, equipping each Tesla with the hardware needed for full self - driving capability at a safety level substantially greater than that of a human driver.

Other environmental policies include promoting smarter energy use through the ecoEnergy Initiative; a Chemical Management Plan to regulate chemicals harmful to human health and the environment; $ 1.5 billion over seven years for the production of renewable fuels; a commitment to ensure that 90 percent of Canadian electricity needs are generated through non-emitting sources by 2020; and additional government funding to acquire and preserve ecologically sensitive lands.

The state of the natural environment plays a critical role in defining human quality of life and serves as a production factor for economic development.

The only truly scarce resource according to Simon is human time, whose allocation into the production of material things can always produce more of them.

Will it open up new avenues for the technological production and consumption of human embryos, another concern to which the encyclical speaks (117, 120, 136)?

Production becomes completely independent of the human potentialities and capabilities of the worker.»

This ideology is the basis for a mode of production, especially in the affluent countries, whose thirst for profit and for irrational expansion has not only promoted the pauperization of the majority of the planet's human population but has also led to the plundering and pollution of nature.

The maternal face consequently becomes the material manifestation of the infinite longing for each human person, the visible reminder of each human person's being wanted and desired, of each person's infinite value and worth regardless of output or production.

In order to show that increasing total production does not improve human welfare, we have developed an Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare (ISEW) for the United States.