Modernity was the effort to destroy the claims of the medieval church to authority in order to put its own conceptions of
human rationality at the center of human thought.
Not exact matches
Amazing, such
rationality presented by you... oh wait, not really rational to poke fun
at your
human being unless your own self esteem is so low that the only means to feel superior to your fellow
human being is to belittle them for their beliefs... kinda like what the religious do to you.
So the knowledge imparted was
at different levels, - technical
rationality, critical
rationality to evaluate ends, universal
human values, and the humanism of the person of Jesus - but with search for the unity of their inter-relationship realized in the renewal of personal and community life as the ultimate goal.
All recognize in each
human some element that is not subject to the otherwise universal flux; it is stable, enduring, and important,
at least during the brief season of our
rationality.
At Regensburg he speaks of the holistic, formal, «intrinsic
rationality» of the object of
human knowing, «the mathematical structure of matter», as a «presupposition]».
Or are they,
at least to some degree, the product of
human rationality, initiative and choice?
In an attempt to inject some realism into the study of
rationality, Gerd Gigerenzer and his team
at the Max Planck Institute for
Human Development in Berlin are investigating the idea that evolution has endowed us with a set of mental shortcuts — tools for making quick decisions.
«If we really want to get through to young people, we need to take these insights into account when designing interventions,» says coauthor Ralph Hertwig, Director of the Center for Adaptive
Rationality at the Max Planck Institute for
Human Development.
They are simply driven to seek new experiences and try out new things,» says lead author Wouter van den Bos, researcher in the Center for Adaptive
Rationality at the Max Planck Institute for
Human Development.
I was
at a dinner a couple weeks back
at which several journalists spoke on just this issue, and Shankar Vedantam and Chris Mooney made a good case for what I have also suggested (including in my reply to you on April 6); What's really irrational is for smart people, in support of the myth of perfect
rationality and frustrated by the public's «ignorance» about risk, to ignore the mountains of evidence from neuroscience and social sciences about how
human perception and decision - making actually works, about risk or anything else.