Sentences with phrase «human reason denies»

When human reason denies its basis in creation, it becomes unreason.

Not exact matches

LOL: The Christian perspective is that God does indeed exist, and because of that, all human beings (including the ones who deny His very existence) are still endowed with some of the gifts He's given us — such as some capacity to reason, create, and love, though all imperfectly.

Christianity views health care as a basic human right that should never be denied for any reason.

Since the same God who reveals mysteries and infuses faith has bestowed the light of reason on the human mind, God can not deny himself, nor can truth ever contradict truth» (Catechism of the Catholic Church 159).

To speak of sexual undertakings in the way implied by the traditional marriage rites of the churches is to deny people access to a basic human good from the start and for reasons that are difficult if not impossible for modern people to grasp.

I do not think this is any reason for denying the human self the title of fundamental entity, or actual being.

There is no reason to deny that human virtues are genuine goods in God's sight as well as man's.

In another sense, it is also true to say that existence precedes essence, and the metaphysical view is consequently wrong in denying it, for essence in this case is defined within the world of interpersonal relationships, within the world of history and human society, within the world of reason itself which Teilhard would call the noosphere.

For centuries orthodox faith attempted to deny God's complicity in the execution of the word, God's own innocent son, by claiming that human sin was the sole reason for Jesus» death.

«In the names of reason, science and liberty they had proved, rather effectively, that good societies need God to survive and that when you have murdered Him, starved Him, silenced Him, denied Him to the children and erased His festivals and His memory, you have a gap which can not indefinitely be filled by any human, nor anything made by human hands.»

It is ironic that people who are denied, or have been denied, basic human consideration for reasons which they had nothing to do with (the genetically controlled color of their skin) would so aptly deny these rights to others who are in exactly the same position.

When morality is based on religious text, its OK to: • behead one's daughter to restore a family's «honor» • deny emergency medical aid to a child • kill gays, children who misbehave, anyone who works on a particular day of the week, entire groups and races of peoples, and many others for equally capricious reasons • buy and sell humans as chattel, including one's own family members • kill anyone who visually depicts Muhammad

To claim that this question has no meaning is to deny the core of human reasoning.

Those of a somewhat reactionary bent posited a primitive divine revelation, denied human reason's ability to reach certainty in moral and religious matters.

Human medicinal product approval can not be denied for this reason.

The Royals reserve the right to deny any dog or human entrance to the ballpark and the Bark at The Park event for any reason they may see fit.

If we denied the evidence of nutrition, medicine, and human interference as the primary reasons for diminished reproductive ability in today's most elite canines, we would be short - sighted and therefore comprise the study.

Your dog evolved to be your household dust buster, and there's absolutely no reason to deny her human food.

The letter portends to offer facts about «climate change deniers, but readers can't even get further than the first paragraph without running into an unsupportable talking point about skeptic climate scientists saying global warming «isn't happening / happening, but for natural reasons / happening and caused by humans, but it's not so bad.»

Climate change denial is a set of organized attempts to downplay, deny or dismiss the scientific consensus on the extent of global warming, its significance, and its connection to human behavior, especially for commercial or ideological reasons.

Climate change denial is a term used to describe organized attempts to downplay, deny or dismiss the scientific consensus on the extent of global warming, its significance, and its connection to human behavior, especially for commercial or ideological reasons.

What is so often, with reason, denied, is that the extent of the consequences and / or of the human effect are greatly exaggerated by activists for ulterior impractical ideological reasons.

For example, the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario has dismissed claims of discrimination against the Ontario Drug Benefit Program on the basis that there was no Code - related reason for denying coverage, but rather a dispute over its efficacy and safety as a medical treatment (e.g. Kueber v. Ontario (Attorney General), 2014 HRTO 769).

There was no question that Ottawa Valley Cleaning and Restoration had discriminated against Bouraoui contrary to the section 5 («employment») of the Ontario Human Rights Code: Jesse's sole reason for denying Bouraoui employment was his race, colour and place of origin.