Sentences with phrase «human relationships do»

Not exact matches

What it does: This bacteria has a complicated relationship with humans.

Think about Match.com, for example - does it eliminate human relationships or simply help you optimize and accelerate the search for the next great relationship?

His relationship with Vanguard management is as harmonious as it has ever been, he said before commending McNabb's team for doing all it could to keep Vanguard «human.»

Don't be afraid to let your personality come through to build a more human relationship with them.

Through problems like the one posed by Clippy, Nass's study of what makes computers and other technologies «easier, more effective, and more pleasant for people to use» led him to explore how to do the same with human relationships.

But does equating the collision of cereal pieces with the basis of all human relationships stretch a metaphor too far?

How do you see humans» relationships with robots and machines evolving when it comes to business, friendship, and even intimacy?

Overhauling the human resources department is a matter of high priority and it will be done to enhance relationships with drivers and garner feedback from concerned employees.

But the movie doesn't shy away from portraying Mr. Buffett, now 86, as something of a remarkable human computer, gifted with numbers and less so with interpersonal relationships.

Contact between entrepreneurs and investors is especially difficult to police because the female founders have no human resources department to report the harassment to, and employment laws don't directly address the relationship between an entrepreneur and an investor, said Bay Area employment attorney Sonya Smallets.

The relationship between China and Tonga is mutually beneficial — China doesn't harangue Tonga about human rights while giving it aid, and China gets a strategic ally.

Furthermore, robo - advisors like Betterment and Wealthfront don't offer the option of a relationship with a human advisor.

«If they can do that, then [the Department of Health and Human Services] could declare that the doctor - patient relationship is one of a fiduciary duty, right?»

People who don't believe in your God are still capable of deep committed love, it's through our intimate relationships with other human beings we learn the true meaning of love.

But just because God is holy does not stop Him from establishing relationships w / humans — including Isaiah (prior to a Messiah ever stepping on earth).

We know that its faceless agents are «out there» — though we do not know quite where even now — on missions that sacrifice persons to ideology, human relationships to «contacts» and «assets,» hearts and minds to the gears of the propaganda machine.

If the openness to life is deliberately and completely excluded or blocked later, then the physical aspect of the union does not have its specific finality at all, and neither is the communion spiritually unitive as a human relationship.

They did not see the additional goods they might acquire as more valuable than the human relationships that would be damaged.

The only «proof» to which it can be subjected is this: Does it correctly portray the God - human relationship?

A Question Of Human Dignity I applaud James Legge for directing attention towards questions to do with the relationship between animals and man (Faith, January / February 2004).

If you think these men a sheltered life and don't understand human relationships and fatherhood it is because you haven't bothered to understand their mission within the church.

The dynamics of human development, of sexual relationships, and of interpersonal adjustment are now interpreted with insights which have not been available in the past, and we have discovered that much pastoral work has been done in ignorance of many factors which we need to understand.

The joy of the gospel of marriage springs from charity: 2 the same charity that compels bishops3 to faithfully proclaim the good news of marriage revealed in Christ; the same charity that is inseparable from the Truth, who frees the human person and reveals to him what it means to be human.4 Only in Jesus does every human being discover what it means to be truly human, to be made for God and to live in relationship with God, to have true happiness.

Indeed, no such abbreviated statement as we here are making, with a few quotations from the Hebrew Psalms, can begin to do justice to the Psalter as a compendium of all the moods and attitudes, conflicts, desires, and aspirations of the human soul in its relationships with God.

(Liberal religion refers to open and ongoing revelation, interconnected relationship grounded in love and never coercion, an understanding of our responsibility to assist the arc of the moral universe in bending toward justice, and our understanding that there are resources both human and divine that make it possible for us to do so.

The reason unconstrained aggression is so potentially destructive to human relationships is that often it does not permit those subsequent goods to emerge which otherwise could have taken root if they had not been withered by the heat of aggression.

But if you can start and maintain relationships with Christians who see things differently than you do, you'll discover they are real human beings who care about other people.

Does this not suggest dualistic thinking, that the divine and human, the spiritual and the physical have no intrinsic relationship?

Marriage does not bring ultimate fulfillment because we are so constituted that no human relationship can satisfy us totally.

In doing this, we have turned our backs also on our fellow human beings and find ourselves largely deprived of true relationships.

As the most intimate of all human relationships, as the one that to the majority of people is the most central and precious, the one giving the most joy - as well as the most pain - does it not contain enormous theological potential?

Human relationships count for nothing, and certainly relationships to the land do not enter into the picture.

I do not agree with those theologians who fear that human cloning would diminish the value of intimate relationships between husbands and wives or add one more obstacle to the formation of «traditional» two - parent families.

Taking note of the altered world - consciousness of human beings in this century, according to which Being is to be understood in strictly interpersonal terms, Mühlen suggests, first of all, that the classical expression homoousios, as applied to the Son's relationship to the Father, does not necessarily mean that the Son is of the same substance as the Father but only that he is of equal being (gleichseiendlich) with the Father (VG 13).

We humans have a difficult time grasping this, since we don't know what it is like to live in such a relationship at all, let alone for all eternity.

And when women, dancing Sarah's circle, affirm the importance of relationships in human life, they are doing more than reflecting women's psychology; they are showing all Christians what it means to be created in God's image.

All this has been taken into God; all this is immediately known to God; all this is treasured in the divine memory; all this qualifies whatever we are prepared now to say about God and about the divine relationship with the world and more especially about that relationship as it has to do with human existence.

Miller remains limited to the web of human relationships, and does not acknowledge the theological dimension of human existence.

I have urged in an earlier chapter that to be human is to be both body and soul in a complex relationship in which the soul (or do we mean mind here?)

The point when I realized I had to do something about this barrier coincided with the moment I realized I had to do something about my relationship with my human father, whom I had not seen for years.

God presses on my heart, your heart, ALL humans hearts to love folks, give them grace when they do not deserve it as to draw us together into loving relationships.

What we should have done is to see that in the «Galilean vision», as Whitehead called it, we have the clue to the proper category for use in the God - man relationship; the category is «love in action», the divine Lover acting and the human intentional lover acting too.

Precisely that kind of man, «transported by his passion» — in this case his being caught up into a relationship with God in Christ, although it may very well be true in other ways as well, since to be «transported» by passion is to enter upon the most profound experience possible to human beings — precisely such a man does feel and know what is nothing other than «the secret of the universe».

This theory does not cover relationships with one human with an idea or a belief.

Those who do not believe in God or Christ must have never thought about the universe, its order and continued existance, or thought about the human body and all it's functions and enjoyed a new born baby, or thought about the earth and how it continues to show proof that God did in fact create it like described in Genisis, or thought about hundreds of other examples that prove beyond a doubt that God made all this happen and keeps it operating daily!!!! The only being that messed some of it up is people and that is why God gave us Christ to bring us out of our depraved state and back to the proper relationship with HIM.

To Ken Margo: I am totally agree with you about this evil thing going around the earth... this evil minded people is there everywhere regardless of faith... that was not what i was trying to say... my point was to be able to recognize the One True God who is Unseen and who has no partners as He is not in need of any partners but we the creation is in need of Him... thats all... I wish I could do something to stop all these taking place around the earth... I think we human fear the fed laws more than we fear the laws of our Creator, for example not to associate any partner with Him, taking the life of others, drug dealing, human trafficking, believing in hereafter and so on... I remember a story that I was talking with one of my friends... I was telling him look we all obey the law of the land so much like for example when we drive and no one moves even an inch when there is a school bus stop to pick / drop kids as it is a fed laws but when it comes to the laws of our Creator, we don't care... like having physical relationship outside of marriage and many more... then he said something nice... he said that its because we see the consequence of breaking the law of the land but we do not see the punishment of hereafter even though it is mentioned very details in Quran, it even gives pictures of hereafter....

But it does not mean that freedom and responsibility can not be found in human experience and relationships.

Let's see what he has done in our human relationships.

What we shall do is to speak first in this chapter of what I call «personal human relationships,» while in the two following chapters our interest will be centered on «familial relationships» and broader «social relationships» (including neighborhood and the like, with reference also to the significance of the «city»).

It means leaving the privacy ot your solitary labors, moving beyond those expected work relationships in which the product is always the go - between, and saying or doing something about the human affairs — the public realm — of that organization or community of which you are a part.