Sentences with phrase «human rights questions»

These are the fundamental human rights questions posed by this super-realistic docudrama which takes a long look at ethnic cleansing from both the perspective of the cleansed and from the point - of - view of the perpetrators of the crimes against humanity.

To respond to these and similarly urgent requests, we have created an On - call Scientists Hotline made up of especially experienced On - call Scientist volunteers each with an exemplary record of contributing to human rights questions in a wide breadth of fields.

He has a long history of activism on human rights questions.

Hours before Monday's attack, the UN high commissioner for human rights questioned the measures being taken by Egypt's government to combat jihadism.

Not exact matches

But there are important limits to machine learning, and the biggest of these is that it still requires humans to frame the right question.

As blame fell to Facebook for Trump's election, word of Facebook prototyping a censorship tool for operating in China escaped, triggering questions about its respect for human rights and free speech.

Zooming in on climate change, Proxy Preview highlights one new shareholder proposal «that raises questions about transporting oil and gas by train and several taking up different angles on deforestation that connect ecological and human rights impacts.»

Other new questions about environmental issues include large - scale land acquisitions in the supply chains of food companies and related human rights problems.

With the Transpacific Partnership (TPP) currently under review and free trade agreements in discussion with several economies in Asia, the question of linking human rights with trade policy looms large.

An example of what Ottawa could do would be to assess and publicize the effect that any trade or investment agreement is likely to have on human rights in the country in question.

To be sure, valid questions may be raised about whether Enlightenment justifications based on insecurity in the state of nature can truly ground human rights.

I argue that the TULIP doctrines are a complex answer to the question, «How does a human being get right with God?»

if the first pair would nothave sinned they would still be here and all human kind would know is the ways of almighty God and existing on a paradise earth — wich still is comming.the reason he didn't destroy Satan immediately is because he posed a Question as to almighty Gods right to sovereignty..

In an exclusive interview at the launch of a new report into human rights abuses in North Korea he said: «If you are caught practicing religion by yourself then you're sent to prison camps - no question.

It would be natural, then, to make Orthodox theological anthropology the overarching theme of the Council and to address all other questions — such as jurisdictional disputes, ecumenical dialogue, and human rights — as embraced in the common Orthodox vision for the renewal of humanity.

Those questions involve the nature of the PRC regime; the doctrine and canon law of the Church; the impact of such an agreement on Vatican diplomacy in promoting human rights; and the Church's twenty - first - century mission in China.

@whippstippler7 You have to ask the right question first: can God order you kill another human now?

Of the 2,004 adults questioned, statements around political debates were considered by many as extreme, however, almost half the public disagreed it was extreme to believe animals have the same rights as humans.

If God is as the Calvinist insists, then they are right: we mere humans can not question God's judgment or challenge His choices from eternity past to choose some for redemption and others for reprobation.

And where custom dictates that for the sake of convenience we keep to the traditional academic structure, the philosophical question still remains as to whether biology (or psychology or any other human science) has a genuine right to autonomous existence.

The following three questions, based on the analogy above, illustrates the difference between respect for human rights and the management of terror.

Modern moral and political thought has often focused on the question of human rights: What rights, if any, belong to all human individuals solely because they are human?

The issues implicit in these considerations require a longer discussion than the focus here on the question of human rights allows.

I will call these formative rights the rights to private liberties, where the term «private» means here that the freedoms in question can be defined without any explicit reference to human association.

Following Apel, I will use the term «communicative rights» to designate the formative rights that belong to all humans as potential participants in moral discourse, and I will call the formative principle in question the principle of communicative respect.

Let's also consider the wider question of moral reasoning — how human beings come to know right from wrong.

We can say summarily that a neoclassical address to the question of human rights is a return to pre-Kantian and largely premodern thought in a way that virtually all contemporary political theories find incredible.

«When in the course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another...» But the Declaration then quickly moves, in the very same sentence, to the question of by what right or by what authority such a change is to be made.

Long lists of human rights, while they may sometimes be well intended, only obfuscate the question and distract us from the work at hand.

If it does not, it will be outplayed by those who truly differ on questions of human rights or who cynically manipulate them.

Those who think that human rights is a «motherhood issue» around which all rational people can unite have not given the question much thought.

If it is indeed a human life then the question becomes, does this human life have a right to exist or not?

These people fully believed they were in the right, because they thought God had directed them to commit these crimes against their fellow human beings, and they were largely unwilling to even begin questioning their long - held beliefs.

The question is whether it is right to destroy innocent human lives.

If one were to generalize on the nature of the topics addressed, one would note a marked focus on questions of individual morality, human rights, and strong, limited government.

Liberalism — a respect for human or natural rights; limits on the scope and power of public authority; state neutrality on fundamental questions of,....

On what other great question of human rights, in this case the most fundamental right, which is the right to be protected from willful killing, does Cafardi say «the battle is over - permanently»?

This is why the word transcendent appears in Ramsey's writings; but it is not always clear whether he is stressing the «transempirical» as a concept of imageless thinking or whether there is a «nonobservable» beyond all human endeavor; if it is the latter, there is a question whether we have any right to be articulate about it.

This blunt and provocative book, now a best seller, is meant to shake up what Manji calls mainstream Islam, to which she puts her honest questions about fundamentalist attitudes toward women, human rights, Jews, the U.S. and even the Qur» an.

Hasan is to be praised for this groundbreaking work, and anyone interested in oriental Christianity, as well as in questions of human rights and religious freedom, ought to read it.

Human Rights and Human Dignity Pope John Paul once mused that his pontificate was unlikely to be remembered, but that if it was he hoped to be remembered as «the pope of the family».11 In addition to grappling with the status of the human embryos, both DV and DP deal at length with questions relating to aspects of in - vitro fertilisation and the integrity of marrHuman Rights and Human Dignity Pope John Paul once mused that his pontificate was unlikely to be remembered, but that if it was he hoped to be remembered as «the pope of the family».11 In addition to grappling with the status of the human embryos, both DV and DP deal at length with questions relating to aspects of in - vitro fertilisation and the integrity of marrHuman Dignity Pope John Paul once mused that his pontificate was unlikely to be remembered, but that if it was he hoped to be remembered as «the pope of the family».11 In addition to grappling with the status of the human embryos, both DV and DP deal at length with questions relating to aspects of in - vitro fertilisation and the integrity of marrhuman embryos, both DV and DP deal at length with questions relating to aspects of in - vitro fertilisation and the integrity of marriage.

We debate endlessly about Peace, Democracy, the Rights of Man, the conditions of racial and individual eugenics, the value and morality of scientific research pushed to the uttermost limit, and the true nature of the Kingdom of God; but here again, how can we fail to see that each of these inescapable questions has two aspects, and therefore two answers, according to whether we regard the human species as culminating in the individual or as pursuing a collective course towards higher levels of complexity and consciousness?

Behind the questions as to right or wrong decisions and attitudes, however, there are ultimate theological questions: what is the meaning of human existence?

Taking up the question of architecture, music, sculpture, painting, literature, philosophy, and the artistic life, Christian next refers to George Weigel's book, The Cube and the Cathedral, which uses Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris (representing religious art) and La Grande Arche de la Defense (representing secular art) to ask, Which culture would better protect human rights and the moral foundations of democracy?

Questions of human rights and social responsibilities have never needed to be asked on a wider scale.

Add to this the latter's reluctance to question any aspect of Islamic culture (even though many reform - minded Muslims do); and the idea that Islamophobia is more intense and widespread than Christianophobia (even as human rights organizations document just the reverse), and you begin to understand the depths of the problem.

The American church has largely purported just one theology about the modern state of Israel, but now questions are being asked - especially by younger Christians learning of persecution and human rights issues happening in the region - if the church should have a more active role in peacemaking.

The relation between globalization, development and human rights raises policy and legal questions.

Many also have raised questions about the impact of globalization on the condition of women, on gender issues, on questions of migration, and as we are going to be discussing in this Consultation on the situation of human rights.

By human adequacy I mean its capacity for dealing with the larger questions of right and wrong, good and bad, which people face In their quest for a satisfying, happy life.