Sentences with phrase «human side of science»

Wellington, New Zealand About Blog Our Changing World covers topics across all scientific disciplines, natural history and environmental issues, and developments in health as well as exploring the human side of science and the personalities behind it.

Wellington, New Zealand About Blog Our Changing World covers topics across all scientific disciplines, natural history and environmental issues, and developments in health as well as exploring the human side of science and the personalities behind it.

NOVA, the weekly science series on PBS, is in its 44th season of educating and entertaining audiences with programs driven by engaging story lines, striking images and glimpses into the human side of science and technology.

Not exact matches

Side by side with the growth of science, which is also the basis of the material prosperity and unification of the world, has come a steady deepening of human sympathy, and the extension of it to all weak and suffering thingsSide by side with the growth of science, which is also the basis of the material prosperity and unification of the world, has come a steady deepening of human sympathy, and the extension of it to all weak and suffering thingsside with the growth of science, which is also the basis of the material prosperity and unification of the world, has come a steady deepening of human sympathy, and the extension of it to all weak and suffering things....

Amen.The thing is too many people from both sides try to disprove the other, Scientist (well some) will say there is no God Ala Hawkings here and then some believers will say that evolution or anything pertaining to science that they don't understand is false.I don't believe that science and God are mutually exclusive.For me personally science helps to explain a lot of things regarding creation, almost like giving me a window into how creative God is.I believe that God uses science to show us how awesome he is.To me science does not disprove Gods existence it actually reaffirms it on a human logic level, for me.You may disagree, that's fine, but this is just how I see it.

Posed as an important site for the maintenance of national security, this nearly 2000 - mile expanse is also one that bears biodiversity and ecosystem significance on both sides of the border.This panel seeks to better understand the intersection of science and technology with national security, human rights, environmental and cultural resources along U.S. - Mexico border.

On the next page, check the «Science and Human Rights Report» box or the «Professional Ethics Report» box in the bottom left side of the Update Your Email Preferences page in the «Additional Newsletters from AAAS» section.

Subscribe by checking the «Science and Human Rights Report» box in the bottom left side of the Update Your Email Preferences page in the «Additional Newsletters from AAAS» section.

Anyone who feared that the writer's directorial debut would abandon the cerebral, doughty fare of his previously - penned Sunshine, Never Let Me Go and roughly 15 minutes of 2011's Dredd need not have worried — more than any of Garland's previous efforts, Ex Machina weighs the heavier side of science fiction and what it means to be human.

Fundamentalism and the subversion of science The dark side of absolutism Faith and homosexuality Faith and the sanctity of human life The Great Beethoven Fallacy How «moderation» in faith fosters fanaticism 9.

A responsible skeptic will request that you remain open minded to opinions from both sides, and consider the uncertainties involved * without * prejudging them based on the demonstrable human predilection toward a «herd mentality» — by «herd mentality», I mean that once a consensus is formed, a flock of «me too» science papers become much more easily accepted, by peer review journals, than the skeptics» papers.

Their approach, despite the underlying urgency, is one of patience and persistence, accommodating the nature of the human side of the problem (our varied interests, our political focus on the here and now, our limited menu of competitive non-polluting energy sources) as well as the risks identified by science.

There is no «side» to science, outside of the normal human habit of wishing to be right, and to convince others that one is right, and recognizing when something is as or more important than many discoveries in the history of human civilization.

While religious doctrine and science have often been at odds, the pope's message that global warming trends are caused by human activity puts him firmly on the side of 97 percent of actively publishing climate scientists.

It doesn't matter what «side» of the climate issue you're on — if you're a human being, you value science.

It's now frightening how little climate science is known by both sides of the debate on human causation of global warming.

For example: Marsicek et al «Reconciling divergent trends and millennial variations in Holocene temperatures» Nature 554:92 - 96 2018 So nothing really amiss on the science side — in terms of our human emotions and tendency to personalize and argue — that's another matter altogether.

neither do those uncertainties allow scientific closure — as long as models of the climate system's behavior decay into chaos on shorter time scales than human history, climate modeling will remain prey to misrepresentation by those well enough paid, or ideologically bloody minded enough to do so: the trouble with the climate wars is that neither political side, activist or obscurantist, really gives a damn about the science, and those presuming to speak for it invite damnation by both.

A holistic study covering the physical science, social science, and the human dimension sides of the problem has not been attempted thus far.