Their approach, despite the underlying urgency, is one of patience and persistence, accommodating the nature of
the human side of the problem (our varied interests, our political focus on the here and now, our limited menu of competitive non-polluting energy sources) as well as the risks identified by science.
Not exact matches
On the other
side, the summoned «believe in some form
of original sin or the impossibility
of human perfection, and therefore tend to be skeptical
of the empirical attainability
of any final solution to the deepest
human problems» (p. 153).
So we're at the place where we can say a couple - four things from the existential
side of the
problem of evil: [1] from the perspective that pain exists, and we perceive it, we as
human beings (you could say «people») have an urge to do something about it when we see it.
So comparatively to Wolfe and Percy, the agrarians appear as a relic and perhaps (at least in some cases) too one -
sided in their «phenomenological» descriptions
of the way that the
problems and the possibilities for
human goodness if not greatness appear today.
Nicholas Berdyaev the Russian philosopher was most critical
of the traditional Christian ethics which confined itself to the ethics
of law and ethics
of grace and ignored the ethics
of creativity, while secular modernity to which Christian modernism succumbed, elevated the
human vocation
of creativity as supreme and as capable by itself
of solving the
problem of destructivity within it without the need
of grace and even
of law in the long run Anthropology got perverted on all
sides by converting Creation into an order
of static laws which are only to be obeyed and perfected by grace in Catholic thought and by getting validated for collective existence without criticism but to be rejected as totally irrelevant in the realm
of existence in grace in Protestant thought.
Even if we can not know the answer to all
of society's ills, even if we can not pretend to know how to solve the
problems of crime and drugs and inflation and poverty, we can still proclaim that it is obviously and unquestionably a moral wrong to maintain a penal system based on vengeance instead
of rehabilitation; to allow
human rights violations to go unchallenged (on either
side of the iron curtain); to waste vast quantities
of food and resources while others are malnourished and sick and poor; or to allow so many children in our own midst to go through childhood unwanted and unloved and even abused.
If you see a
problem of either
side demonizing the other, like Richard has, by all means, lets be civil and
human in all things, to all people.
It is also possible that sleep
problems encountered by
humans may not necessarily be an inevitable
side effect
of aging and may even be reversible.
But boxed wine may have an environmental dark
side: Some
of the plastic bags inside the boxes contain Bisphenol - A (BPA), a synthetic chemical that has been in use for four decades to strengthen plastic food containers and other items but recently has been linked to a range
of human health
problems.
Robert Evans, The
Human Side of School Change: Reform, Resistance, and the Real - life
Problems of Innovation.
The
problem with the pet use
of NSAIDs made for
humans has been unacceptable (even life - threatening)
side effects:
Reported cases in
human medicine
of liver conditions and blood abnormalities It is important to stop therapy and contact your veterinarian immediately if you think you pet has a medical
problem or
side effect from this product's therapy Can this drug be given with other drugs?
But these
side effects tend to be less
of a
problem in ferrets than in
humans or dogs.
On the other hand, campaigns that focus only on demand -
side policy, on the population's demand for cheap, polluting fuel, tend to overlook the effects
of the massive political - economic disinformation campaign by the fossil fuel industries and their political surrogates on laming climate action once
human - caused climate change was recognized internationally as a
problem around 25 years ago.
A holistic study covering the physical science, social science, and the
human dimension
sides of the
problem has not been attempted thus far.
It revolves around a simulated court proceeding, in which teams representing both
sides of the argument prepare written pleadings with respect to a fictional
problem of international
human rights law and policy, and present their arguments in an oral argument before the International Court
of Justice.
So I am coming to the conclusion that perhaps this usage and adoption
side of the
problem comes down to that most fundamental
of human characteristics: trust.
One
of the really important things you do as a criminal defense lawyer is just the simple act
of saying, I see you as a
human being, I'm on your
side, you're not just a «defendant» to me.That can be a big part
of solving the legal
problems, too.
In the other
side confident self - esteem causes that
human could control and direct the created actions and if individuals organize their actions and control their thoughts, most
of the
problems and issues can be solve automatically.