Sentences with phrase «human species on»

What would be useful is action, now, to clean up the tenancy of the human species on its finite planet before it's too late.

We are talking the end of the human species on Earth if we don't get... See Moreour acts together soon.......

Scientific evidence is springing up everywhere that indicates the massive and pernicious impacts of the human species on the finite resources of Earth, its frangible ecosystems and life as we know it.

From my humble perspective, humanity could soon to come face to face with formidable, human - induced global challenges, but humanity's greatest challenge, (the proverbial «mother» of all potential global challenges), is the one posed to the human family by the unregulated growth of the human species on Earth.

Leaders of the human community can not fail in their declared mission to acknowledge, address and overcome certain global challenges already visible on the far horizon that evidently result from the huge scale and growth of unregulated propagation, unrestricted consumption and unbridled production activities of the human species on Earth.

How can the rest of the world expect these two large countries to make a serious effort to control overpopulation if the rest of the world doesn't also seriously embrace their own contributions to there already being too many of the human species on this planet?

If we begin with a vision of planetary brotherhood living in ways that allow for the perpetuation of the human species on earth, then the specifics can be worked on.

Agree with Human Species on everything, including the GO GATORS part (class of 77!!)

Not exact matches

On the one hand, some species of bacteria are responsible for some of the most nefarious of human diseases.

On the other hand, many species have peacefully coevolved with humans for hundreds of thousands of years to play essential roles in digestion and in bolstering the immune system.

On the contrary the fishing of sharks for their fins by humans has brought many species to the brink of extinction.

Elon Musk is using his companies to pursue his personal idealistic goals: He wants to move the world to renewable energy, and he wants to establish a colony on Mars to preserve the human species.

In October, Musk outlined the SpaceX strategy for reaching Mars and even his goal of settling large groups of people on the planet as part of his vision of making humans into a «multiplanetary species.»

If a calamity, self - made or otherwise, destroyed life on Earth, as long as a human colony was established elsewhere, the species could endure.

Reading Pierre Trudeau's remarks today, I'm struck by his foresight on issues like protection of fragile Arctic landscapes, and the capability of humans to push our species and others into extinction.

As Musk likely sees it, this is just another setback on the road to turning humans into an interplanetary species.

Wouldn't it be a miracle if one day, perhaps in my lifetime, humans turned their back on the past and became the one incarnation of the species Homo sapiens to accept that there is no god and pour their intelligence and resources into the discovery of reality?

So in that spirit, you can start realizing that it is the human species which will go on, if it doesn't become too self - destructive.

Marriage is a source of proles — children who carry on the family name and tradition, perpetuate the human species, and fill God's Church with the next generation of saints.

After God killed all the people on the planet, why not make a better human, instead of allowing the species to continue after it had proven itself unworthy?

In any event, the actual answer to your query will be lost on you, but apes and humans had a common ancestor that was indeed more like modern apes in many ways (especially with respect to cognitive development), but identical to no modern species.

The Church relies instead entirely on the scientific fact that every unborn human being is, from the moment of its conception, a member of our species.

That platform is a delicate living matrix out of which the human species evolved and on which it is still dependent for life.

Now he reviews a new book on ethics and writes,» [The author] agrees with what now seems to be a near - consensus among philosophers that «speciesism» - the view that we are entitled to take theinterests of animals less seriously than we take human interests, simply because humans are members of our species - is not a morally defensible position.»

There is another literature that argues for the preservation of species on the grounds of their possible eventual usefulness to human beings.

everything is made up of atoms (don't believe me do some research) its the different variables of heat and light and things like that that cause different reactions to make different things and these things when they interact can create something completely different and you and slowly the process of mitosis or miosis starts to work and form stuff hell i learnt that in high school and it was a catholic one at that a millions of years ago i bet the universe was completely different and had things in it that our minds cant even imagine that have since changed over time from action and reaction to what we have today and in another million years who knows with all the different gases we pump into the air and the weather getting more intense on both ends of the scale life as we know it will be different the human race will have to evolve to survive and will probibly form into a slightly different species hell maybe well evolve into 2 different species like in the movie time machine

Princeton bioethicist Peter Singer popularized «speciesism,» a derogatory term for the belief that it is acceptable to treat humans differently from animals based solely on species membership.

D. Green, one «reason» why God allows human suffering is because nothing in this life is mortal, everything is fragile, life, human beings are the most sophisticated species on this planet, yet we easily perish via illness, disease, ect.

If there are still different possible futures for planetary life in general, and for human existence in particular, those futures have come to depend increasingly on decisions made by the human species.

Not threatened, just angry and so saddened in having so many of our species passing on what is in effect a computer virus for the human brain.

Has life on earth labored along for two or three billion years in lonesome struggle eventually to eke out by accident the human species which has to gather itself together in various fragile social arrangements in order to protect itself from the intolerable muteness of the universe?

The science (human population genetics) is clear that our species arose as a population, and that is what I have focused on (since that is my area of expertise).

Despite agreeing with mainstream science on these issues, they deny evolution: they believe that the vast majority of species (and especially humans) were independently created by God during earth's long history.

Humans are indeed unique — as is every other species on this planet.

When the image of God entered into the species which is humankind, that species was ordained to find its order on a plane other than the animal, and because of the presence of that divine image, dominance on the human plane is not a natural order but a disorder.

Humans are the only known species on Earth predisposed to thinking there is something more to the universe than just what is immediately observable.

Apes continued to develop on their branch, while various human species continued on another.

Morality, love, ethics are all natural human characteristics which are based on survival of the species and evolve from societal needs.

If the world continues to accept disappearing tree - cover, land degradation, the expansion of deserts, the loss of plant and animal species, air and water pollution, and the changing chemistry of the atmosphere it will also have to accept economic decline and social disintegration... such disintegration would bring human suffering on a scale that has no precedent...» 7

An exaggerated focus on human significance places value so heavily upon our own species that it thereby drains value away from the non-human aspects of nature.

Most of us are politely quiet and secretly roll our eyes when someone says that god speaks to them or that they have been touched by god etc., yet when someone mentions any of the other things we are quick to point out that they are wackos... perhaps it is time for us to speak up and say there is no such thing as god and it is time to clear our heads and get on with moving the human species forward and leaving fairy tales and silly beliefs behind.

Building on these elemental physicochemical orders, successively more complex patterns have evolved, culminating in the most advanced organic forms comprising the human species.

That's why I think we really need to step up the incentives to use more reliable methods that don't count on humans to be too reliable... we just aren't as a species.

Our biologists have catalogued the species of life on Earth and found no monsters or kraken, our doctors and psychiatrists have penetrated the human mind and found no evil spirits in the heads of the mentally infirm, our meteorologists now explain the whether in terms of barometric pressure, not angry sky - gods, our geologists understand earthquakes in terms of plate tectonics and continental drift — no angry deity is shaking the ground.

For as regards infra - human living things, even on the suppositions already mentioned, the question is probably still open, or has not yet been sufficiently subjected to examination, whether the living substantial formal principle of what in the metaphysical sense would be a real species (biological category, etc.), is multiplied with the individuals of the species (biological group, etc.), or is one and the same principle which, unfolding its formative power at various material points in space and time, manifests itself more than once in space and time.

The time will probably come when humans are extinct on this changing planet, like so many species before them.

The challenges which lie ahead can not be overcome by any one person or group working on their own but only by the human species working as a whole.

The new story of all life on this planet has undermined the permanence of any species, including humans.

When scientists announce that the chemistry of DNA is so certain, universal and uniform that all forms of life on earth are essentially the same, a credulous public jumps to the conclusion that traditional claims for the uniqueness of the human species have been nullified.

The much better looking Grudem, a professor at Phoenix Seminary and past president of the Evangelical Theological Society, had similarly jarred me two years before when, speaking at a fundraising dinner ostensibly focused on the stewardship of creation, he smilingly advocated the extinction of a species to satisfy human appetites.