Sentences with phrase «human subject on»

In the past, SRHRL has offered a course to guide scientists on such sensitive topics as racial and ethnic minorities as human subjects, and a workshop on the ethical and legal implications of research with human subjects on the internet.

Furthermore, one study examined alterations in resting metabolic rate in human subjects on alternate - day fasting diets, and found no changes after a 22 day period (67).

Not exact matches

Human resources expert Jason Evanish, for example, suggests offering thoughtful gifts like a book on a subject your sales rep cares about.

It'd be unethical to test a substance on human subjects, because it might sicken or kill them.

Moving to a subject that's near and dear to Musk's heart, the «Mass Effect» series focuses on space travel, interstellar diplomacy, and the future of the human race.

Or if you're looking for a deeper dive there's a whole book on the subject by Peter Cappelli, director of Wharton's Center for Human Resources, entitled Managing the Older Worker: How to Prepare for the New Organizational Order.

Believing you're smarter than people trained in a subject you're not isn't just obnoxious, but also deadly; as the Challenger and perhaps Ford cases show, the lives of human beings are on the line.

Human resource experts and accounting firms alike are all clear on the subject: It's an issue to be ignored at a company's peril.

According to Citizen Lab, Netsweeper has been used to block access to websites on subjects like human rights and homosexuality, and sites dedicated to opposition points of view.

Unless Congress acts on a new plan that would subject anyone who kills those animals for human consumption to a jail term and up to a $ 2,500 fine.

a good discussion between you two guys on a timely and difficult subject... my take on yr position David is that I often see it (not necessarily yrs) as a program and not geuine love for another human being.I'm reminded of something I read recently:

Human beings are alot more complicated than simple black & white on this subject.There is a large amount of gray area that most people in the world float in on the subject of spirituality.

Many books written for Religion actually touch on the subject which is Love and being NON JUDGMENTAL because there can be no human that can tell me they know exactly what God is only my faith and love towards myself and my fellow Humans is an expression of his love not the intolerance or hatred that is spewed out in the name of God, God is ABOVE all of that CRAP PERIOD.

Please do your research on the subject matter, as there is much more to learn about human evolution.

You know, when I think about «empire» — Roman or Egyptian or Chinese or Russian or American — and consider both accomplishments and damage inflicted (human and otherwise), and then think about what Christianity might have to say on the subject, the first thing that comes to mind is «to whom much has been given, from him much will be required.»

ian... not sure which part you wanted me to reply on, but I will take issue with yr point about homosexuality being a threat to human existence.I'm no expert on the subject, but I think we cd safely assume that the phenomena has been with us since our ancestors came out of the trees... we're now over six billion and growing at an alarming rate.Not sure where you might find the data on this supposed threat to going forth and multiplying.BTW, I have read that homosexual behaviour is observable in the animal kingdom, but I wd need to do some work to reference a credible study.

YOU:: Shld the modern world ignore the new knowledge that's available to us on the subject of human sexuality?

It sheds light on various subjects: pastors, suffering, and the human experience.

On the subject of abortion, if all life is sacred and life starts at conception, why does God allow millions of the unborn to die from miscarriages and spontaneous abortions, more than die from abortions performed by humans?

Shld the modern world ignore the new knowledge that's available to us on the subject of human sexuality?

It is customary and even ethically mandatory that experimentation that carries with it a substantial degree of risk to human subjects first be tested in an animal laboratory or, at the very least, on a computer model.

In the monarchical model, God knows the world externally, acts on it either by direct intervention or indirectly through human subjects, and loves it benevolently, in a charitable way.

The Church's vigorous stance on this subject is based on morality, logic, science and human rights.

actually you do nt have to prove the many deities or Gods that they really exist, because they really had existed in their times, They are part of the evolutionary process for us humans to transcend to higher consciousness.To simplify the analogy, when we were young and we are in the lower grade school, we were taught simple subjects not advance literatures but simple stories even mythicals, The same with religion, thousands of years ago when there was no science yet, primitive people had a religion, of course man made faiths to conform with their state of mind or intellect.But later atfter thousands of years we evolve into a more educated people and so new concept of God again was presented to them, another man made concept, and this go on and on, until a few thiousand years ago.monotheism, Judaism, christianity, islam, buddhism, etc also evolved, But with the accelerated evolution, these faith again is threatend with obsolesencs because of of scientific developments and education.In panthroteistic faith, the future religion needs to conform to evolutionary process, This proves that God is always there guiding the change.And it his will that made this a reality in history since the begining of the universe 13 billion years ago, and this will continue to exist until He will completely fulfill His will to infinity, Thats PANTHROTHEISM, the futue, man made religion under His guidance through scientifiic evoluition after the Bi Bang

Much of the discussion of the first directive has concentrated on the issue of non-violence, but it also says that «the lives of animals and plants... deserve protection, preservation and care».18 The church's record on this issue has been subject to criticism, and certainly modern European society has tended to exploit the natural world and to emphasize the gap between human and other forms of life.

Subjecting dictation of ALL THAT IS to human rationality (quickly: consider the «status» of humans on earth relative to the rest of the universe) is, well, nuts.

The public has the power to do whatever it chooses; controls now exist, for instance, regulating experimentation on human subjects.

While we are on this subject, how is it that those who take a high view of the Scriptures are known to produce less by way of creative biblical interpretation than those who either bracket the question or treat the text as a human document?

The Synoptic Jesus» focus on the urgency of human readiness to receive God's promised basileia on earth is a subject of much scholarly debate regarding the tension between the signs of its arrival — the blind see, the crippled walk, as proleptic manifestations of Jesus» mediation of God's rule here and now — and the promise of a fullness of that reign yet to be consummated.

The Oasis board told the EA that they had «no corporate view» on the subject of human sexuality, a statement from the Evangelical Alliance confirmed.

Toward that end, the State, the «law of the land,» gave him permission to experiment on human subjects put at his disposal.

Today more than ever before we feel the need — and also see a greater possibility — of objectifying the problem of the subjectivity of the human being... [W] e can no longer go on treating the human being exclusively as an objective being, but we must also somehow treat the human being as a subject in the dimension in which the specifically human subjectivity of the human being is determined by consciousness.

The phrase «insh» Allah — «if God wills it» is common, just as some Christians often used to say «Deus vult» (d.v.) Yet this does not mean that human behaviour is pre-determined, although at one time there were heated debates on the subject.

The main point of all my writing on this subject has been to raise our sights above what Pope John Paul II called «economism» — a view of economies driven solely by a materialist, economic understanding of self - interest, the profit motive, cupidity, and greed, and a denial of all the nobler human aspirations.

On the other hand, every propositional formulation of the truth that is disclosed, even that through which we come to the meeting with God in Christ, is subject to human error and must be tested against the revelation itself.

Its «moral value» is not automatic, but depends on conformity to the moral law to which it, like every other form of human behavior, must be subject.»

Most of what is known of human nature from mathematics and the physical sciences is based on reflection on those disciplines and hence is not normally thought to be part of their proper subject matter, but to belong more to the philosophy of science and mathematics.

On first thought, no subject of study would seem a less likely candidate for the office as liberator of the human spirit.

and i'm unclear on the subject of consequences, which are generally human - made constructs.

For as regards infra - human living things, even on the suppositions already mentioned, the question is probably still open, or has not yet been sufficiently subjected to examination, whether the living substantial formal principle of what in the metaphysical sense would be a real species (biological category, etc.), is multiplied with the individuals of the species (biological group, etc.), or is one and the same principle which, unfolding its formative power at various material points in space and time, manifests itself more than once in space and time.

The chief points of change are, first, that the scene has been transferred from the supernatural world of the gods to the earthly sphere of human history; secondly, that It is not a god who experiences the renewal of life (for the God of Israel is not himself subject to death and resurrection, but on the contrary initiates and controls these events) but the people of Israel, who look in hope for restoration when their existence is threatened; and thirdly, that this hope is expressed as a metaphor describing the historical future, rather than as a myth of cosmic renewal.

A general summary was provided by ethics experts who testified before then - Congressman Albert Gore's Committee on Science and Technology in 1982: (1) Though risks in experimentation are inevitable, a strong bias toward the sacredness of human life requires the highest regard for the patient or subject.

One thing is certain though, religions are human inventions and have no light to shed on the subject.

[1] For more reading on this subject try: The Other Side of Calvinism by Laurence Vance, Beyond Calvinism and Arminianism by C. Gordon Olson, The Dark Side of Calvinism by George Bryson, Calvinistic Paths Retraced by Samuel Fisk, Election and Predestination by Samuel Fisk, and God's Strategy in Human History by Paul Marston and Roger Forster.

That God's love, manifest in diverse ways throughout the duration of the universe, might come to a full and unsurpassable self - expression in an individual human being who lived and died in the Middle East almost two thousand years ago does not seem incongruous with what we now understand about the nature of an evolving universe, especially if we regard religion as a phenomenon emergent from the universe rather than just something done on the earth by cosmically homeless human subjects.

Human Cloning, containing a number of relatively short essays on cloning and including also a few statements from religious denominations and the recommendations of the NBAC, is therefore a useful addition to public reflection on the subject.

Either human beings are made subject to the State or they are typically cast as «individuals» — with little meaningful or intrinsic relationship to each other or any agreed notion on what it means to be a human being.

Regardless of your feelings on the subject, a church CAN NOT endorse any political party or candidate; which is what this yahoo did while indicating that human beings should be corralled up like cattle.

The human material on which the demonstration has been made has so far been rather limited and, in part at least, eccentric, consisting of unusually suggestible hypnotic subjects, and of hysteric patients.

It is hard to tell how much of the present skepticism about the worth of our human civilization has come as a result of revealing experience and how much has come as a result of published thought on the subject.