The vehicle was in autonomous mode at the time of the collision, with
a human test driver behind the wheel.
About 100 of the company's self - driving Chrysler Pacifica minivans are now driving around Chandler, a suburb of Phoenix, without
a human test driver — a move that catapults Waymo ahead of its competitors.
But the vehicles have always had
a human test driver behind the wheel.
For now, these fully self - driving minivans — sans
human test driver — are limited to a defined «geo - fenced» area.
Until now, «early riders» who have hailed their self - driving minivan using an app have always had
a human test driver in the vehicle.
On Thursday, Starsky Robotics announced it drove its truck seven miles on a public highway in Florida without
a human test driver.
Industry insiders, or anyone tracking the company's recent moves, likely have predicted the company would pull
human test drivers out of its vehicles before the end of 2017.
Not exact matches
All self - driving cars
tested in California or anywhere else to date have been required to have
human standby
drivers along.
Rather than pay up, Uber got into a lengthy debate with the state in which Anthony Levandowski, vice president at Uber's Advanced Technologies Group (and founder of the self - driving startup Otto that Uber acquired) argued Uber wasn't actually
testing «autonomous vehicles» because all its vehicles had
human drivers aboard and would for the foreseeable future.
The most important reason the
test with James looks fake is that there isn't a
human driver, which is pretty much what will happen with every Uber or Google (and sister company Waymo)
test happening now.
During my
tests, I felt a pang of regret for even agreeing to being carted around like that in the first place, even with a
human driver as a backup.
Proposed regulations would let companies
test self - driving cars on public roads without a
human driver present.
Monday's accident may also call into question new regulations from states like California and Arizona that are letting auto and tech companies
test self - driving vehicles without
human backup
drivers that can intervene if the vehicle makes a mistake.
Expect to hear more questions coming up about the
testing of this technology and how well it handles returning control to a
human driver when there's a situation the sensors aren't ready for.
The fallout from the accident could stall the development and
testing of self - driving vehicles, designed to eventually perform far better than
human drivers and to sharply reduce the number of motor vehicle fatalities that occur each year.
Waymo may be thinking along similar lines: It recently took a big step in that general direction, announcing that some of its
test vehicles operating in Arizona will soon begin
testing without a
human driver standing by at the wheel.
And states that allow companies to
test self - driving vehicles require them, as with
human drivers, to have insurance.
A disengagement is when the
human driver testing the car has to take over from the automated system or when the system itself simply fails.
The 200 vehicles, which consist of both the Model S sedans and the Model X SUVs from Tesla, will be
tested in the «autopilot» mode, which currently requires a
human driver to be present.
«Many [Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards] contain
test procedures that are based on the assumed presence of a
human driver, and will therefore likely need to be amended to accommodate vehicles that can not be driven by
humans,» the notice states.
Jake Fisher, Consumer Reports» head of automotive
testing, said
human drivers «are bad at paying attention to automation and this technology is not capable of reacting to all types of emergencies.
Using genetic and epigenetic analyses coupled with powerful perturbation technologies to
test gene functions in
human cells and mouse models, we hope to identify the critical
drivers of this disease and the basis for therapeutic responses.
Volvo plans its
test of Level 4 autonomy on about 31 miles of highway in Gothenburg, Sweden, in 2017 and wants to next
test somewhere in the U.S. California's Department of Motor Vehicles put the kibosh on that late last year when it issued operator rules for autonomous vehicles that require
human drivers to always be in control.
While companies are
testing self - driving cars on public roads, it's a long leap between that and the total replacement of
human drivers by machines.
It's also where the company started
testing fully - autonomous Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid minivans without
human backup
drivers last November — a first in the industry.
Starting on January 1, 2016, Ontario will allow
testing of driverless cars on provincial roads, but there still needs to be a
human operator with a valid
driver's licence who can take over in case of problems.
For
drivers who are supposedly Uber's «partners,» the experience has to be a little disheartening: it's becoming more and more clear that Uber
drivers are merely cogs in an algorithmic machine,
test pilots for a system that would run even more smoothly if they didn't have to worry about
human drivers at all.
And later today, a Northern Californian startup called Udelv is demonstrating what it calls «the world's first public - road autonomous delivery
test,» in which a self - driving van (with
human safety
driver) will deliver goods from the high - end Draeger's Market chain in the Bay Area city of San Mateo.
Three days earlier, an Arizona pedestrian was killed by a fully self - driving car being
tested by Uber with a ride - along
human safety
driver, raising questions about whether automated technologies can be trusted.
The fallout from the accident could stall the development and
testing of self - driving vehicles, designed to eventually perform far better than
human drivers and to sharply reduce the number of motor vehicle fatalities that occur each year.
One Google car, in a
test in 2009, couldn't get through a four - way stop because its sensors kept waiting for other (
human)
drivers to stop completely and let it go.
A Waymo
test driver will be behind the wheel at all times, but the company insists that the vehicle will drive without
human intervention as much as possible.