Sentences with phrase «human the way god»

Not exact matches

As for the way we hear God other than reading the bible, it is in our mind with a clarity not matched by any human person on earth.

Human technology has a long way to go before evening trying to match what God created.

It is not a political football but a way to live and only God can transform the human heart.

a) that the bible is an imperfect human representation of gods word b) that the bible is a mixture of mythology and divine inspiration c) that the bible was created in a way that people would understand at the time and intended to be updated d) that a pure message was corrupted intentionally by evil humans or spirits

The common image of Calvinism — and I hear it portrayed in this way often, even by people who know some things about theology — is that the religion of John Calvin is a mean - spirited, narrow - minded perspective where a nasty God decides to save a few people while arbitrarily consigning the vast portion of the human race to eternal suffering.

if the first pair would nothave sinned they would still be here and all human kind would know is the ways of almighty God and existing on a paradise earth — wich still is comming.the reason he didn't destroy Satan immediately is because he posed a Question as to almighty Gods right to sovereignty..

I am not above anyone as a Catholic, I am simply a human who believes that God is there for me when I need him, but also that God and Jesus, along with all of their followers have provided me with the tools I need to function in my life without God by my side every step of the way.

God using evolution to create shows way more time and dedication to the emergence of humans, but of course the fundamentalists know best and claim to KNOW that genesis was meant to be 100 % literal despite gaps and missing pieces translating from a very simplistic language into English.

Second: The Creation tale is simply a way for early humans to explain mans creation and «fall» from God's predetermined path... The old testament is full of stuff more related to philosophy and health advice then «Gods word» However, this revelation has not made me less of a christian... In Contrast to those stuck in «the old ways» regarding faith (not believing in neanderthals and championing the claim that earth is only 6000 years old), I believe God created the universe on the very principle of physics and evolution (and other sciencey stuff)... Thus the first clash of atoms was the first step in the billionyear long recipe in creating the universe, the galaxies, the stars, the planets, life itself and us.

After reading several of the posts on the «interpretation of mythical texts into a book called the bible» one is left to wonder how a being who is supposed to have created the universe would permit what is often referred to as «his inerrant words»... to get so screwed up... you would think he / she / it would have been keeping a close eye on a book that he / she / it wanted to have in print for... mass distribution... it is not not a womder the bible is messed up the way it is... it is a «human» construct... only humans could mess a book up that badly... gods do nor make mistakes... except for Rick Santorum

I feel everyone should sip $ 11 coffee's at trendy coffee shops, listen to underground acoustic music, care more about polar bears than humans, wear black framed glasses to look really kewl and smurt, jog in place at red lights, drink Pabst blue ribbon, hate God, and be ironic.It's the kewl and smurt way to be.

God takes two people and joins them into one — in a way that Jesus says humans don't have the authority to separate.

He is vengeful because humans are vengeful and humans created god in their own image — Not the other way around.

Over the 42 years (and more) of being fascinated with the reality of God, I've explored the human experience in ways I'm not proud of, and had to come to grips with very primal realities that all human beings face, especially self - regulation, care and contribution.

No... essentially, God is the collective wild imagination of a bunch of scientifically ignorant humans who lived thousands of years ago and had absolutely no understanding of the world around them, so the only way they could possibly accept the way things were was to invent something that controlled any natural mechanism they didn't understand.

Here you feel humans can take it upon themselves to say who should have kids and here you are, deluded, conceited and playing God to tell Mike not to, by the way, my mom raised me to be highly respectful to women and I continue to strive for that every day.

Hans Urs von Balthasar has insightfully traced the ways in which the identification of God, creation, and human consciousness strongly shaped both the theistic and atheistic streams of eighteenth - and nineteenth - century Romanticism.

Indeed they do tend to be other worldy but at the same time — wise to the ways of the world and are no less human than what God intended.

In other words, IF God wanted it that way, and IF God designed the human race... he really screwed up the numbers, didn't he?

im so sori this had to happend to eddy yet he is only human and only a man and it has nothing to do do with god and gods word im sori he has to be the example to the world that this is not the way but this is the life he has chosen if it is true he should have known wat happends in the dark will come in the light his bad yet god is a forgiven god just cuz you sit in church do nt make you saved just like sitting in the garage do nt make you a car.... - smile

God has set a narrow, specific yet plain way of salvation (faith in Jesus alone) so only honest humans who honor God can make it to Him.

-- «I guess your church doesn't teach that God favors charity work, or treating your fellow humans respectfully in any way.»

Can the human mind please God in such a way, that we can ask angels to hold up bridges.

I wouldn't call Spenser a greater poet, but he saw the human condition and our often - anguished journey toward God in a richer, more humane way than Milton did, who at the end of the day was more interested in ideas than people.

I guess your church doesn't teach that God favors charity work, or treating your fellow humans respectfully in any way.

God is real and the only way to experience his presence is by suppressing the human follies which this article so blatantly manifest.

And thus it has been ever since: All of us must «come down to the level adopted by God himself in his Incarnation — the level of poverty, crib, flight...» Yet in lowering ourselves to the lowliness that God himself assumes in taking on a human nature, we remain who we are: Some are intellectually gifted and rich in the world's goods; others are impoverished in various ways.

People burned as witches, blacks lynched by Christians in this county, people killed in human sacrifices, servants killed to accompany pharaohs on their journeys to the afterlife, untold numbers of people killed in various cultures because they were deemed to have offended God in some way, and so on.

I find meditation, and compassion for self to be conducive to what you talk of with loving God and mankind — sometimes in mysterious, unfathomable and transcendent ways, encountering the power to open up men and women to each other and God in love peace justice and human dignity.

It makes me wonder if there is primitive life in the universe that worships gods in the same way many humans do.

Since your god supposedly created this world, the creatures populating it, the ways the world works, and EVERYTHING else that is our cosmos — how can WE, as human beings, be responsible for the advent of «sin»?

So if you have a triune god who is father, son, and holy ghost but you have a mother of the human manifestation of father / son god — then Mary is arguably the mother of god and in that way could be argued as the more divine at some point in the history of the transformation of the triune god in heaven to the triune god on earth and of course the few days when the triune god on earth was dead (but not really dead) before rising.

So, salvation clearly comes from another way, otherwise why would God even create humans and put them in these areas?

First, Griffin himself acknowledges that the Plantingan can only allow the occasional violation of human freedom, and there is no way for us to know to what extent God has profitably violated human freedom already.

In his typical humanistic, ethicomystical way of thinking, he points to a belief in the «evolution of human spirituality» where «the higher this development in the individual is, the greater his awareness» of God» (Dr. Schweitzer of Lambarene, by Norman Cousins [Harper & Brothers, 1960], pp. 190 - 191).

Any human could be called upon by God to aid Israel in some way.

it seems that many of us want to create a God in our image, we seem to say, «if I was god, I would do it this way» well, we are not God and just because our human nature doesn't like some of Gods attributGod in our image, we seem to say, «if I was god, I would do it this way» well, we are not God and just because our human nature doesn't like some of Gods attributgod, I would do it this way» well, we are not God and just because our human nature doesn't like some of Gods attributGod and just because our human nature doesn't like some of Gods attributes.

One could see continuity between the way God worked in gradually bringing life into being in all its complex forms, including the human, and God's continuing work in human history and in our lives at present.

In this way, by the most shocking of theological twists, we learn what God is truly like only after we have learned what a human is truly supposed to be.

He once again sent the wind to push back the waters into their designated places, to dry out the land so that humans and animals might once again have a way to fulfill their God - given task of filling and subduing the earth.

Paul is making a contrast between the ways of human beings and the ways of God.

The good news is that God's eternal plan included a way to right these wrongs without destroying human freedom and even to deepen the glory and beauty of love.

To me the most ironic of all are the ones who think God wanted a human blood sacrifice, and the only possible way to get on God's good side is to acknowledge that.

The whole of God's way in the world can not be written on the small screen of one human heart.

The Bible is God's message communicated in a very human way.

So there had to be a way for God the Son to truly take human nature as his own but without being created as a new human person, because he is God in Person.

I mean, maybe what God did was to reveal that, in a way, human beings are kind of divine.

Could God's incarnation as human be his way of saying we're together, we're united, we're one?»

It is important to see that to identify God in this way is not simply to identify God as an aspect of human experience.

It is a way of loving in which nature works through grace to restore the love in human relationships to God's original intention.