That just proves that
human use of natural gas has nothing measurable to do with atmospheric methane levels.
Not exact matches
Known as a «co-benefit,»
using state
of the art models for
human and
natural systems, along with climate projections from the international community, the team was able for the first time to put a value on the global air pollution benefits
of cutting greenhouse
gas emissions over the 21st century.
Climate change is driven by
human activity — chiefly the combustion
of fossil fuels and changes in land
use — and forests and other
natural ecosystems play a powerful role in both soaking up the greenhouse
gases released by
human economic activity and at the same time sheltering many
of the other 10 million or so species that share the planet.
7 -
Human use of coal, oil, and
natural gas has not harmfully warmed the Earth, and the extrapolation
of current trends shows that it will not do so in the foreseeable future.
Drilling the crude oil, coal and
natural gases from an beneath the earth has a number
of environmental challenges such as extensive land deformation and deforestation; which leads to a wastage
of productive land that can be
used as a plantation to boost the economy, water catchments and to grow
human food.
On the question
of hurricanes, the theoretical arguments that more energy and water vapor in the atmosphere should lead to stronger storms are really sound (after all, storm intensity increases going from pole toward equator), but determining precisely how
human influences (so including GHGs [greenhouse
gases] and aerosols, and land cover change) should be changing hurricanes in a system where there are
natural external (solar and volcanoes) and internal (e.g., ENSO, NAO [El Nino - Southern Oscillation, North Atlantic Oscillation]-RRB- influences is quite problematic — our climate models are just not good enough yet to carry out the types
of sensitivity tests that have been done
using limited area hurricane models run for relatively short times.
When Gort first visited in 1951, it spent little effort on climate change issues, focusing on other aspects
of our planet instead: Gort returned in 2012 to answer puny
human climatologist questions about whether climate change caused particular weather phenomena by making an obvious point: rather than struggle with theoretical analysis, you can simply
use your Climate Changeometer to remove all the excess greenhouse
gases and aerosols above
natural levels and then measure the outcome.
It does have the disadvantage that fracking for
natural gas reduces emissions
of CO2 compared to coal, but this is well worth it for providing the advantages
of improving
human lives by
using plentiful, inexpensive
gas and oil.
The model included a more comprehensive set
of natural and
human - made climate forcings than previous studies, including changes in solar radiation, volcanic particles,
human - made greenhouse
gases, fine particles such as soot, the effect
of the particles on clouds and land
use.
The SRI industry
uses a variety
of excuses for why it generally continues to support fossil fuels, or to prefer
natural gas over oil as a «better» option, but the primary rationale seems to be one
of doing less harm or favoring financial return rather than being truly concerned about ecological or
human welfare.
Larger image to save or print.The main
human activity that emits CO2 is the combustion
of fossil fuels (coal,
natural gas, and oil) for energy and transportation, although certain industrial processes and land -
use changes also emit CO2.
[7][8] The vast majority
of anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions (i.e., emissions produced by
human activities) come from combustion
of fossil fuels, principally coal, oil, and
natural gas, with comparatively modest additional contributions coming from deforestation, changes in land
use, soil erosion, and agriculture.