And they warn that while
human women do tend to prefer males with deeper voices, we men advertise ourselves in many other ways as well.
All the verbiage about freedoms and you forget the simplest of freedoms: BEING — and millions of
human women do not have this!
Not exact matches
There are a great many men who don't behave like Trump, who
do treat
women like
human beings and not walking orifices.
This is the root of sexual violence: The idea that
women aren't autonomous
human beings with the right and ability to say yes to sexual interactions we want and no to those we don't, but that we're receptacles for male sexual desire, that our bodies are up for grabs (literally, in this case).
Among the reader responses: «so basically, attractive
women are
human pacifiers for grown ass men»; «I don't even know where to begin with my rage»; «Annnnnnd I'm
done with Eli Roth.»
The founders also believed that African - Americans and
women didn't deserve to vote or be treated like
human beings.
If you
do an in - depth study, Og was a nephilim, the offspring of fallen angels and
human women.
If
humans are the result of so - called «intelligent design» then why
do we have too little room on our jawbones to accommodate wisdom teeth (unless this alleged «god» intended our teeth to rot out since we're not supposed to have learned science, and therefore that the presence of bacteria plus acids are a bad environment for tooth enamel), and that so many of us are near - sighted, and that
women can have FACIAL HAIR (is that a cruel joke?)
Why don't you write an article about Islam accepting
women as
HUMAN BEINGS!
Also, i guess a living zombie, a snake, a rib
woman, a magical tree
does sound strange... i find it much easier to believe in a cosmic event that produced life out of nothing one day and that we slowly evolved from animals into
human beings.
When the U.S. Muslim community sounds out LOUD and CLEAR, without equivocation, and immediately against all forms of terrorism, including all aggressive religious intolerance for
human rights,
women's right, children, equal protection under the law, the respect for other religions to coexist, the right to free speech, and the ability to separate church from state, IF THEY FINALLY
DO THAT AND LOUDLY, then we will begin to feel comfortable that they are truly embracing American ideals and here to join us, not to oppose, defy, or undermine what we hold dear.
Did they kill the
women and boys because of the known $ exual immorality and associated disease that riddled these tribes that offered their children as
human sacrifice and $ ex toys?
It had nothing to
do with the
woman's value as a
human being or her right to decide for herself who she would or would not have sex with.
If a
human being has the gender of «male» AND that same
human being is not the property of a man /
woman / master, then the Bible, in both the OT and the NT, under Law and under Grace,
does endorse sexual intercourse outside of marriage.
For all the talk of justice and of opportunities, it doesn't really help young men and
women who want to marry and have families - in other words, to ensure the future of the
human race in stability and affection.
There is no way I would again attend a church that
does not, in practice, treat
women as peer -
humans, and the Emergence movement as ended my long search for it.
(2358) It
does, however, teach that the meaning of
human sexuality is found within the context of the life - long commitment of one man and one
woman whose love (when enacted sexually) is potentially pro-creative.
... as you stated in another post «By inspiring the
human authors to write what they
did, God made it look like He was the one responsible for the actions of Israel, the destruction of the flood, the murder of the firstborn males of Israel, and the slaughter of Canaanite
women and children.
We covered a lot of ground this week, and we told a lot of stories, but there are still many stories we didn't tell — stories of
human trafficking and sex slavery, stories of men abused by
women, stories of redemption and reconciliation, stories of abuse on the mission field.
When a
women eliminates a clump of living,
human cells from a part of her body she is
doing it because those cells are a part of her body that she doesn't want.
And it went on: «That is why, at this moment when the
human race is undergoing so deep a transformation,
women imbued with a spirit of theGospel can
do so much to aid humanity in not falling».
But yet, the fact remains that in man's «common» experience, in those very
human and historical — and sinful — limitations we know so well, we have the right to find in parabolic fashion creaturely representations of that which God is, and that which God has
done, and that which God purposes to bring to pass in and for and through and with and to this his world and the men and
women whom he has placed in it.
I
do indeed believe, but I believe as one of a great company of men and
women, from many ages, of all races and classes, rich and poor, simple and learned, who in one way or another have been drawn to find the truest key to the meaning and purpose of
human existence given focal expression in Jesus Christ.
A god gets a
human woman pregnant, there's danger in his childhood, he's charged with
doing some great feat before he can join his godly father, he can
do amazing things,...
Does this new finding prove an invisible, all powerful, magic man who lives in the sky had an evil talking snake tempt a
woman, made from a rib, to disobey him, whereby he put a curse on all future humanity, then later changed his mind and decides to lift his curse by impregnating a
human woman with himself and having himself tortured, killed, and raised from the dead, so that if you believe all that, you get to live forever in heaven after you die, but if you don't, he will torture you forever in hell?
Sorry you're no educated on
human rights or
women's rights... the world move past ignorant people like you thankfully and your voice
does get silenced.
Its funny that you want to take my right as a
human to defend myself with as much firepower as possible but you
do nt want to «trample» the rights of
women by not allowing them to have abortions which kill over a million children per year.
Satan bbjss was once God's loved son and the most handsome of all God's sons... Satan's downward spiral was his desire to be like God in every way which Satan could never be... Satan, along with all his brothers who found him to be their leader
did rival God and God's faithful sons and war ensued... Satan along with all his northerly followers were cast out of their heavenly abode and sent to the celestial earthen plains to live among us
humans... Thusly the fallen sons of God saw the daughters of mankind to be fair and they took from mankind all the
women that they willed...
Seminarians and priests of the time who had a
woman or a male lover on the side could, and
did, cite
Human Sexuality to reasonably claim that a very large part, if not the majority, of the academic theological establishment countenanced their behavior.
Both mainline Protestant and Catholic churches have been addressing the degradation of
human sexuality and especially of
women that pornography entails rather than emphasizing as the religious right groups
do the inherent objectionableness of sexually explicit and sexually stimulating material.
It seems the most likely scenario is that he married his sister or less likely his niece.The reasoning is that Adam and Eve lived alot longer and continued to have sons and daughters GEN5: 4 aCTS 17:26 Paul tells us that the God who made the world hath made of one blood all nations of man to dwell on all the face of the earth.Cain
did nt marry to another tribe or nation as every man and
women was a relative and of the same bloodline of Adam and Eve.The importance of this is that sin entered through one man Adam and is past through the bloodline so redemption is only possible through the same bloodline.So for the formula to work the
human genome had to stay the same no other tribes or nations just the descendents of Adam and Eve.It also solves another riddle in that satan at various times prior to the flood and after the flood tried to contaminate the bloodline by his angels having sexual relations with the
women this created a type of alien in essence and would have not been able to have been redeemed by the blood of Jesus as it wasnt fully
human.This is where the giants came from and why God wanted to destroy them as they had the potential to destroy the
human race as they couldnt be redeemed by the blood of Jesus.Interesting?
And when
women, dancing Sarah's circle, affirm the importance of relationships in
human life, they are
doing more than reflecting
women's psychology; they are showing all Christians what it means to be created in God's image.
But people are ready to believe ideas and theories made up by men in search for an answer how
did the first
humans come to exist... ITS CALLED... GOD THE FATHER, SON & HOLY SPIRIT... THE CREATOR OF THE HEAVENS and the EARTH... CREATOR OF MAN and
WOMAN.
Mainly, because in all the verbiage about freedoms of beliefs there is something so important, so blatantly acute yet everyone
do not even mention it, except - oh genial me: Why would anyone in the whole world support any type of creed / belief / religion where a whole lot of
humans — as in millions of
human women — are not allowed to go to school, to even just read and write - less become a teacher, doctor, lawyer, president of their own companies, their own countries, mutilated by the millions when they reach puberty, WHY is this allowed?
Woman has no other function in
human life but to mother a child, a greatest service, man can not
do without, reason for a children to carry their fathers name.
Why
did God think it better, to facilitate communication among men and
women, for them to live in small huts on a
human scale, with windows and streets, rather than on information superhighways?
And, oh, when the hour - glass has run out, the hourglass of time, when the noise of worldliness is silenced, and the restless or the ineffectual busyness comes to an end, when everything is still about thee as it is in eternity — whether thou wast man or
woman, rich or poor, dependent or independent, fortunate or unfortunate, whether thou
didst bear the splendor of the crown in a lofty station, or
didst bear only the labor and heat of the day in an inconspicuous lot; whether thy name shall be remembered as long as the world stands (and so was remembered as long as the world stood), or without a name thou
didst cohere as nameless with the countless multitude; whether the glory which surrounded thee surpassed all
human description, or the judgment passed upon thee was the most severe and dishonoring
human judgement can pass — eternity asks of thee and of every individual among these million millions only one question, whether thou hast lived in despair or not, whether thou wast in despair in such a way that thou
didst not know thou wast in despair, or in such a way that thou
didst hiddenly carry this sickness in thine inward parts as thy gnawing secret, carry it under thy heart as the fruit of a sinful love, or in such a way that thou, a horror to others,
didst rave in despair.
To talk about privelidge in the light of that and some very difficult expereinces both he and I have had, which as
human beings, has required counselling and to undermine that issue is to
do every bit as much as those
women expereince who have been victims, which then experience secondary vitimisation by their difficulties being swept under the carptet.
Morals
do not come from belief and in fact we can find a great many immoral issues with belief - the bible is a proponent of such immoral issues - rape;
human sacrifice; animal sacrifice; child abuse; mass murder; idolatry (the 1st 4 commandments are exactly that); bigotry (the non-stop judging of gays based solely on what the bible says); oppression of
women; incest.
Polar contrasts — such as
human effort versus God's acting, «
doing» versus «being,» a redeeming God versus a creating God —
do not necessarily reflect «
women's ways of knowing» God.
God who creates
women and men for freedom and for community, divine and
human community,
does not play pre-determination with those very creatures.
A belief system which blames all of the
human sins on your kind... it labels
women as property... tells
women they should be silent and tells men that
do what they wish to you including killing you.
In fact, if you would find the highest tributes to Jesus» personality,
do not go to the theologians, but to the poets; go, that is, to the men and
women emotionally and intellectually keyed to the recognition of beauty and greatness whenever they appear in
human life.
In so
doing I realized that
human beings are born with the ability to experience God and that this happens in a special way to
women during pregnancy and childbirth.
By inerrant I mean, as the word suggests, without error; such that if God were interested in directing an inerrant account of the life of Andrea Yates it simply could not say «the
woman heard God say that she should drown her children in the bathtub» but would have to qualify it with «the
woman believed that she heard...» Without that qualifier, it would not be inerrant, it would not be «untrue but historically accurate» if God
did not actually say it then saying that he intervened in
human history at that point would be incorrect.
so how come Adam appears BEFORE plants and animals in Genesis 2, but
humans (men and
women together) don't arrive after the plants and animals on day 6 in Genesis 1?
A socio - biologist can tell a young
woman on the best scientific authority that nature designed her, body and mind, to conceive, bear and care for children, but it he can not tell her in the name of science that in so
doing she will fulfill her
human possibilities, and he can not answer her when she declares war on such natural necessities.
Many men grow up so scared of
women they never develop healthy relationships with any of them; they don't actually get to know a girl as a co-equal member of the
human race.
Many who stand for the value of
women and support their
human rights don't call themselves «feminist» because of how it's become politicized.»
It's not to
do with
human nature per se; it's to
do with sin: envy, jealousy, possessiveness, quarrelling, a lack of willingness to forgive and forget, infidelity, manipulation, the desire to control and dominate, lack of consideration in matters to
do with running a home as well as in the bedroom (sex can be one of the highest expressions of love between a man and a
woman; it can also be incredibly selfish); hearts that are consistently closed to new life.