Sentences with phrase «humankind does»

Professionals step in when required to provide, what the Susskinds call, «practical expertise» — the knowledge, experience, and know - how the majority of humankind doesn't have.

Although it pains me to massage your ego in this way, I do feel you ought to take more responsibility to research facts (as they are) rather than just regurgitate disinformation (as the oil companies want you to)... Those who warn of serious environmental consequences for planet Earth if humankind does not radically change its ways are not trying to spoil anyone's fun or freedom; they are merely pointing to the truth of the Second Law of Thermodynamics (i.e. that energy can not be created nor destroyed) and the reality of Entropy (i.e. that energy conversion leads to increasing disorder in the Universe).

Do you think, as a recent poll of passersby in Berkeley found, that more than a majority think humankind doesn't deserve to remain on earth?

But then humankind does what much of humankind does best and ruined it all.

If humankind does not police its own numbers, then mother nature will, just as she does for roaches, deer, and the rest of her children.

(We should note that humankind does not universally share the supposition: Not shamanist cultures nor Confucian or Taoist China nor the high Indian religions suppose any such thing.)

(b) Under this overall sovereignty of God, humankind does have a position of control over nature, which is approved by God and which is meant to be exercised in a spirit of respect and responsibility.

God is a but a metaphor for that which humankind does not know about reality and / or over which he has no control.

All humankind does this, do they not.

Precisely because this God continues to direct and command through his Word alone; because he never constrains in an absolute manner, and because he takes into account everything humankind does, including evil.

Many of humankind did ye seduce.

(The finding forced Chazan to reconsider a paper he was preparing, in which he had planned to argue that humankind didn't use or light fires until about 400,000 years ago.)

Does humankind do not learn it?

Not exact matches

When you're done feeling sorry for yourself and wallowing in your despair, you'll have something in common with the rest of humankind.

And if banks are doing God's work — and «lift people out of poverty,» as Blankfein said at the Clinton gathering last year, how can encouraging talent to leave that work to join the government be beneficial for humankind?

NASA Administrator Charles Bolden said of Cernan's passing, «truly, America has lost a patriot and pioneer who helped shape our country's bold ambitions to do things that humankind had never before achieved.»

Was humankind created by God in a rush of divine power, or did we evolve over time with only nature to take the credit?

We do have a duty to love each other and all humankind, even in our brokenness.

Since GOD is so powerful, he / she (or it or whetever) he can directly appear to the world & give a book to humankind & tell that this is what I want all human have to do like this.

They don't have to accept your misogynous philosophy about humankind.

I don't know that I have great hope for the future of humankind, but you never know.

Vic: «God did not cause people to crucify the Lord Jesus Christ, rather, as God is Omniscient, He knew beforehand what man will do at «Free Will,» and He (God) therefore predetermined the counter measure accordingly, hence turning the evil doing of condemning the Lord Jesus Christ to the Cross † into Salvation for humankind.»

Do these early texts, and does Christianity as a religion, contain an appreciation for humankind's highest virtues and most noble ideals?»

Even humankind itself can be treated as an instrument, since the individual does not matter, only the future, the cruel deity adjudicating over one and all.

Fact is that you are free to believe whatever you want, it doesn't really help for you to even try to understand the simple elegant FACT of evolution, besides you lack the skills, knowledge, education, and understanding to contribute to fixing the problems that humankind will have to fix in order to survive.

Play having opened him up to the possibility of relating directly to joy itself, Lewis later found that joy to be fully actualized in his personal experience with Jesus Christ.83 According to Lewis, not only does God's joy cause us to «en - joy» on the tangent of play's horizon where the radical otherness of God meets the radical wholeness of humankind, but joy also expresses itself in the encounter with the person of Christ.

The God is humankind's creation in order to have something to believe in that doesn't really exist that unifies everyone for social acdvantage.

I don't care where the money comes from, what you're doing is amazing and an example of how humankind should be.

We don't need to be afraid: people are genuinely seeking answers to the puzzle that is humankind, and we have so much that is glorious and precious to present and to teach.

Yet the doors which he was content should remain closed were among the most significant confronting humankind, and if we are to vindicate his readiness that they should so remain sealed, we can only do so if we suppose that his mission imposed on him a particular set of choices.

If being born gay is «negative for humankind», what do propose doing to the millions of folks who are born gay each year?

Do you believe and trust in his Son Jesus Christ, who redeemed humankind?

Where such a reality (as spelt out in 1) does not exist, either practically or experienced as such by those living in an illusory construction of the present («our inviolable shores» ideology) the talk of peace tends to take on impractical («brotherhood and sisterhood of all humankind») and essentialized («the global village») colours.

If this end were acknowledged, then female warriors would represent the same tragic defeat for humankind as do male warriors.

This puts the onus only on women to support or reject a misogynistic religion — not on ALL of us, as humankind, to do so.

Such narrow vision does not take in the broad view, the single cause of all of these disorders — humankind's propensity to dominate.

Hyperseparationism is often a symptom of the fear of imperialistic faith groups (supposedly) seeking to dominate society and government (as most faith groups would like to do — in the sense of wanting their vision for all humankind to prevail) Prior to the 1960s the Roman Catholic Church may have aroused that anxiety; more recently Protestant fundamentalism has stirred it.

It does make possible a quantum jump in the degree to which humankind can take control of the evolutionary process, including the evolution of human beings.

It is really ok that we don't know what caused the big bang yet, but it is harmful to humankind to simply take the easy route towards answering it and shrugging our shoulders and pointing towards a higher being.

This theoretical attitude, which comes so naturally to modern scientific humankind, is likely to be far more destructive to Christianity than any attack that the atheists might launch, because it can cut the very heart out of the Christian life — and in such a way that the individual does not at all think of himself or herself as having given up the faith.

That «something» which, Frost says in classic understatement, doesn't love a wall, Christians know, from reading St. Paul, is God the Father of Jesus Christ, who has shown humankind in every possible way how ungodly our walls are.

Casting off the confines of the silliness of belief is what will finally free up humankind to some measure of greatness, provided of course believers don't succeed in squashing education in favor of myth, or blowing up the planet in the name of some angry invisible hominid who apparently lives in the sky.

First, humankind can be given a right direction, enabled to move properly toward God, and not only have the capacity to «perceive and know what things» we ought to do but also be given «grace and power faithfully to fulfill the same.»

When all of humankind ceases to believe the nonsense that bubbles from the mouths of Sunday preachers and finally seek the goodness of humanity which dwells in each one of us, it will be at that point we will begin to see ourselves as equals in a quest to do better then we have done in 2000 years.

So here is what we do: We change the name of Christmas to Goodwill Toward Humankind Day and scrap anything that even remotely smacks of religion, because in the end, taking into account every single religion is problematic.

In whatever fashion is possible — and God is the God of possibility as well as of actuality — God will do for humankind the best that can be done.

Our failure to recognize the differences between humankind and extrahuman creation is but one more manifestation of our alienation from nature: we don't even know enough about nature to see the differences within it.

Mormons do not have a death wish on the USA but it is an unnecessary cult because in The Bible, humankind has everything it needs to learn how to behave according to the Word of God.

Basically I try to look at the bigger picture and do what's most beneficial for myself, others, and humankind as a whole.

I guess that is the new Green Thing to do with humankind....