Sentences with phrase «humans are evil»

Mr. Swier, do I think humans are evil and should be treated like an infestation?

Surprisingly, since most programs like this offer misanthropic global warming propaganda (humans are evil carbon - spewers who are going to destroy the planet), the polar bear program was remarkably even - handed.

It still means you believe that humans are the evil destroyers of climate (misanthropy)

Humans are evil and good enough to more than account for the acts attributed to either god or the devil.

Humans are evil in nature but some choose the path to peace and forgivness which is the core of true evangelical Christianity.

they would scream and shout of demons and hell; about the world burning and how all humans were evil.

Not exact matches

We are nowhere near the apocalyptic scenario in which smart evil robots turn on humans, said Eric Schmidt, executive chairman of Alphabet.

«At least when there's an evil dictator, that human is going to die.

An understanding of good and evil doesn't just come from religion, it comes from being human.

I think it's somewhat plausible to say that god gives us the choice to do evil, which accounts for human - made wrongdoing.

a) that the bible is an imperfect human representation of gods word b) that the bible is a mixture of mythology and divine inspiration c) that the bible was created in a way that people would understand at the time and intended to be updated d) that a pure message was corrupted intentionally by evil humans or spirits

To endorse gay marriage, abortion and distruction of innocent human life, no matter what color of that child is unnatural and evil.

The human spirit that reaches highs and lows with love and evil all contained in fleeting moments of heart yet are timeless.

«We must never forget that the evil comes not from the actions of «subhuman vermin» but from the heart of a fallen, sacred yet degraded, human being,» I wrote.

I have always interpreted it as telling us that human beings have baser instincts that can lead them wrongly and make them do evil things.

Since atheists and agnostics are just as prone to human frailties as the religious, I don't doubt that there * are * evil people who are athiests... but facts and numbers show that these «evil atheists» are a bunch of pikers compared to the violence and viciousness of those who promote hatred and violence in the name of their God.

Unfortunately in my case, I've probably gone to excess the other way... after 43 years of being (in my view) threatened with hellfire for every cotton - picking thing (including the «sinfulness» of being born in the first place because it's a well - known scriptural fact that every human is born sinful and separated from G - d, with a heart that does nothing but desire evil and no way to please G - d even when righteous), threatened with being «left behind» in the rapture (should I fail on some doctrinal (belief) point at the crucial moment)... I refuse to consider ANY possibility of hell at all.

What has Islam learn t??? It is err to human, it require evil intention to repeat it and that too sanctioned by religion.

Sorry, it is supposed to be «To err is human», to repeat it needs evil inside us or sanction from religion or both.

This is wonderful, here we have women trying to carry out the teachings of their saviour, you know care for your fellow human, comfort the sick and needy, feed the hungry and the Pope and his evil cabal of crooks want to EXCOMMUNICATE them.

True, where humans are involved, we see a reflection of good and evil in how we can create Babel towers out of a lot of things.

Pure evil and pure good are imagined human concepts without examples and without proof.

In 2016, he said that God had been «unjust with his son,» announced his prayer intention to build a society «that places the human person at the center,» and declared that inequality is «the greatest evil that exists.»

They can't find a DNA link to prove evolution they can't map the last human DNA the one they say is mostly human good and evil or even the soul.

To read these histories is to see the evil of the systematic, the cruelty of impersonal human ingenuity, and the prison of the Enlightenment's constraining rationality.

Teach people s - e-xis basically bad / evil, teach people s - e-xis only for procreation, teach people anything but unsatisfying missionary position is unacceptable, deny a deep and fundamental human drive and let's see how that plays out for everyone...

Some of us are evil because we are all humans.

maybe Americans should learn to respect human being if you know that evil act will lead to violence and people will get offended why would you do it?

Some would argue that looking at the naked human body is not evil, because God made it beautiful, and Adam and Eve were naked in the garden.

The Church, however, has consistently taught over the centuries that the direct and intentional taking of innocent human life, as in abortion, is a grave and intrinsic evil.

And while conversion may not be looked upon as evil to one who is already converted, it is most definitely evil to those who are told they must convert before they are considered good human beings.

It is a very helpful guide to the formation of conscience with respect to questions raised in voting and other political activity if, in fidelity to the Church's teaching, one recognizes the «intrinsic evil» of taking innocent human life in abortion.

Hence, for me to refuse to go to Germany under these circumstances would be tacit assent to the assumption that the Holocaust was an eruption of such primordial, unintelligible evil that the human beings who perpetrated it were as powerless as its victims.

I can not say when it comes to God to human rights what is «evil».

That said: «But god did not foresee — that man would want a companion» = > «It is not good for the man to be alone» are the words used — so God did know and provided «that the snake would talk to the humans» = > «the serpent was more crafty than any other animal» - deception required capacity to deceive «that the humans would choose knowledge (and why else was that tree there)» = > It was not knowledge but knowledge of good and evil.

These with Alcohol or drugs are the key works of the devil... only now when seeing and realizing the evil it brought among humanity into losing the real meaning of the word «Human» it self among Humans...!!!

«Salvation» began to be taught as an extrinsic juridical transaction rather than an experiential internal transformation and Law rather than Grace [Unconditional kenotic Love] became the solution to coping with human evil in classical Protestantism.

But the line dividing good and evil cuts through the heart of every human being.

The disfunction of evil forces which block the way to human fulfillment is a means of salvation.

That is, while Griffin acknowledges that Plantinga affirms limitations on God's power in relation to possible worlds containing free human beings, he believes Plantinga to hold «that an actual world devoid of beings with some power of self - determination would be possible» and thus that God could have created a world containing no evil simply by creating a world containing no self - determined beings (GPE 271).

The central claim is made that moral evil... occurs because God — even though he is all - good and all - powerful — out of goodness decided to give freedom to human beings.

Budziszewski insists that such efforts are self - deceptions, because human beings can not evade the deepest voice of conscience pronouncing their deeds evil.

Is Evil alive on Earth in forms that aren't exactly human?

They are, therefore, genuinely evil both from the human and divine perspectives.

Morally, as Ruether has noted, the individual is ambivalent, fundamentally good but capable of great evil; consequently, a feminist critique must keep hold of a judging as well as an affirming dimension if it is truly to respond to the human condition.

If you were to base your definitions of «good» and «evil» on human society, well, it's easy to see how people would consider God to be evil.

The classical response to nonmoral evil we have been discussing begins by affirming «C» omnipotence in relation to humans and then argues that there do exist good reasons to believe that such a moral world would include instances of genuine nonmoral evil and plausible reasons for assuming that such a world would have the types and amount of genuine nonmoral evil we presently experience.

Humans are humans and will always do evil tHumans are humans and will always do evil thumans and will always do evil things.

The process theists believe that the only way to solve the problem of evil is to assume that human wills and nature as a whole have their own autonomy.

And then Jesus came upon his disciples and said, «What's this shit I've been hearing about me being a human sacrifice for your sins!!? Who in the goddamned hell came up with that Neanderthal bullshit!!!? What are we, living in the fucking Stone Age!!!!? Blood sacrifice!!!!!!!!!!!?? Are you fucking kidding me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!??? Listen, brethren, thou can takest that pathetic, immoral, sadistic, evil, sickening, disgusting pile of Cro - Magnon donkey shit and shove it straight up thy fucking asses!!!&raqare we, living in the fucking Stone Age!!!!? Blood sacrifice!!!!!!!!!!!?? Are you fucking kidding me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!??? Listen, brethren, thou can takest that pathetic, immoral, sadistic, evil, sickening, disgusting pile of Cro - Magnon donkey shit and shove it straight up thy fucking asses!!!&raqAre you fucking kidding me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!??? Listen, brethren, thou can takest that pathetic, immoral, sadistic, evil, sickening, disgusting pile of Cro - Magnon donkey shit and shove it straight up thy fucking asses!!!»