So yes, there is a conundrum of evidence that more than implicates
humans as a major contributor to Global Climate Change.
Not exact matches
As well as being a major contributor to human - induced greenhouse gas emissions, current livestock production has other environmental impact
As well
as being a major contributor to human - induced greenhouse gas emissions, current livestock production has other environmental impact
as being a
major contributor to
human - induced greenhouse gas emissions, current livestock production has other environmental impacts.
AGW is a hypothesis that makes sense, namely: — GHGs absorb outgoing radiation, thereby contributing to warming (GH theory)-- CO2 is a GHG (
as is water vapor plus some minor GHGs)-- CO2 concentrations have risen (mostly since measurements started in Mauna Loa in 1959)-- global temperature has risen since 1850 (in ~ 30 - year warming cycles with ~ 30 - year cycles of slight cooling in between)--
humans emit CO2 and other GHGs — ergo,
human GHG emissions have very likely been a
major contributor to higher GHG concentrations, very likely contributing to the observed warming
Indeed, strong observational evidence and results from modeling studies indicate that, at least over the last 50 years,
human activities are a
major contributor to climate change.Direct
human impact is through changes in the concentration of certain trace gases such
as carbon dioxide, chlorofluorocarbons, methane, nitrous oxide, ozone, and water vapor, known collectively
as greenhouse gases.
I believe the
major contributor to this success is my talent
as a persuasive communicator; someone who can speak in terms understandable and build
Human Resources processes and procedures that are easily adopted.