Sentences with phrase «humans did of course»

We started with a focus on the SOPA protests and Chris Dodd's new education on the power of internet politics, but we went much farther afield, including ruminations on the nature of a post-manufacturing America... yep, we did some good, old - fashioned nerding out (in which the eternal subject of a genocidal war of robots vs. humans did of course come up).

Not exact matches

Dave and Helen Edwards, co-founders of artificial intelligence research firm Intelligenstia.ai, don't go so far as to suggest a specific course of study, but like Kalt they have publicly insisted that if you want your kids to thrive in an AI - filled future, you better teach them how to handle human beings, unpredictability, and complexity, all of which a liberal arts degree forces you to confront and grow comfortable with.

What that ignores, of course, is that algorithms are programmed by human beings, and in the process of doing so a million decisions are made that are journalistic decisions, including how to rank different news sources and what kinds of news to exclude.

Of course, having more information on a client is a good thing, but it doesn't address the fact that human advisors are still more expensive than most online services.

Video marketing doesn't get more exciting than showing your human side because you remember, of course, that people want to do business with people, not logos.

Of course, the challenge of doing so is a two - headed coin, with immediate gratification on one side and a lack of human capital investment on the otheOf course, the challenge of doing so is a two - headed coin, with immediate gratification on one side and a lack of human capital investment on the otheof doing so is a two - headed coin, with immediate gratification on one side and a lack of human capital investment on the otheof human capital investment on the other.

see what religion does... all in the name of some imaginary sky - daddy, who is nothing but just one of the thousands of «gods» invented by man over the course of human history.

Of course, human history has not been confined to this enterprise of doing and making, of using the resources of the world in order to achieve that sort of human happiness which comes from satisfying its inexhaustible wantOf course, human history has not been confined to this enterprise of doing and making, of using the resources of the world in order to achieve that sort of human happiness which comes from satisfying its inexhaustible wantof doing and making, of using the resources of the world in order to achieve that sort of human happiness which comes from satisfying its inexhaustible wantof using the resources of the world in order to achieve that sort of human happiness which comes from satisfying its inexhaustible wantof the world in order to achieve that sort of human happiness which comes from satisfying its inexhaustible wantof human happiness which comes from satisfying its inexhaustible wants.

Of course, Cardinal Kasper is right that theology is a human enterprise, done by humans with intellectual and personal histories and dispositions, and not just a participation in a Platonic realm of ideaOf course, Cardinal Kasper is right that theology is a human enterprise, done by humans with intellectual and personal histories and dispositions, and not just a participation in a Platonic realm of ideaof ideas.

Of course, to put abortion in such simple, black and white terms can be shocking to some — and many pro-abortion activists would disagree, saying that a child is not human or nor a person or does not possess rights, or some other such argument.

You say that you don't see Jesus in the churches — I don't know what churches you have been to, but there are definitely churches that do well in representing and teaching Jesus Christ (not all churches of course) HOWEVER... if you think you will find perfection in a human being, you must know that your kidding yourself.

Of course you didn't, or did you?!! Social Justice Jesus and Catholic Jesus share something in common: they are figments of human imaginatioOf course you didn't, or did you?!! Social Justice Jesus and Catholic Jesus share something in common: they are figments of human imaginatioof human imagination.

Of course the sequencing is not quite right, because the poem was written / inspired (take your pick) before science did its work.But the intuitive observer could see a clear evolution form plants to animals to human life, with continuities and differentiations.

Of course, we are engaging a Mystery in the deepest sense when we seek a direct encounter with God and existentialism has its serious limitations as do all human attempts at understanding; but I am drawn to Kierkegaard's insight into prayer:

For example, in addition to having higher levels of genetic diversity, populations in Africa tend to have lower amounts of linkage disequilibrium than do populations outside Africa, partly because of the larger size of human populations in Africa over the course of human history and partly because the number of modern humans who left Africa to colonize the rest of the world appears to have been relatively low (Gabriel et al. 2002).

Catholicism, of course, does not hold this absolute pessimism about matter or human nature.

If one holds that during the course of human history a process of development and refinement in the Church's understanding of Christ has taken place, this does not mean that one is rushing headlong into a position of historical relativism that is ultimately corrosive of the objectivity of our faith.

But we maintain, on the contrary, that we know the Jesus of history very well, even if we do not have a precise and photographic account of his day - by - day activities; and the unique claim of Christianity is that in and by those events in the actual realm of historical happenedness, God is revealed — revealed, of course, in and under the conditions of history and human life, but revealed nonetheless.

It does, of course, make sense to ask «why» when it comes to the actions of human beings.

Of course, this does not mean that quanta have sense experience or consciousness, but even in human beings, these are not fundamental.

When we are dealing in general with the gradual development of the noosphere into planetary consciousness we must of course do full justice to the great, the essential part played by the other sections of the human race in bringing about the eventual plenitude of the earth.

Of course human marriages do not follow the perfection of that lovOf course human marriages do not follow the perfection of that lovof that love.

What kind of god would wish to repeat what we have done to our fellow humans over the course of our existence?

If an unborn child is a human being, it doesn't belong to you, unless of course you believe in slavery.

actually you do nt have to prove the many deities or Gods that they really exist, because they really had existed in their times, They are part of the evolutionary process for us humans to transcend to higher consciousness.To simplify the analogy, when we were young and we are in the lower grade school, we were taught simple subjects not advance literatures but simple stories even mythicals, The same with religion, thousands of years ago when there was no science yet, primitive people had a religion, of course man made faiths to conform with their state of mind or intellect.But later atfter thousands of years we evolve into a more educated people and so new concept of God again was presented to them, another man made concept, and this go on and on, until a few thiousand years ago.monotheism, Judaism, christianity, islam, buddhism, etc also evolved, But with the accelerated evolution, these faith again is threatend with obsolesencs because of of scientific developments and education.In panthroteistic faith, the future religion needs to conform to evolutionary process, This proves that God is always there guiding the change.And it his will that made this a reality in history since the begining of the universe 13 billion years ago, and this will continue to exist until He will completely fulfill His will to infinity, Thats PANTHROTHEISM, the futue, man made religion under His guidance through scientifiic evoluition after the Bi Bang

Insofar as such structures and institutions are of legal character they may, of course) be regarded as merely human and thus mutable, not necessary laws, because they did not always exist but have been — or have still to be — established.

Of course, a human experience has characteristics we do not expect to find in unicellular organisms, certainly not in molecular or electronic events.

Of course when it comes to hearing from God in this way there is so much room for human error so you do need to weigh everything up and ask God to help you discern what is from him.

Of course we know that this evolution was promoted by humans but it doesn't really matter.

Human sacrifice: a burning bush tell Abraham to kill his son (of course, only at the last second does God say «naaaaah, just kidding»)

The idea that there are spiritual forces at work in the world, or that human action does not fully control the public square, is of course rejected as an absurdity by many, if not most, people today.

According to the opening chapters of Genesis, humanity and all the world are created good — but humans repeatedly choose, as they are free to do, a course which yields disruption, alienation and chaos.

Of course mind - only partisans do not mean by «mind» just human mind, or even only the mind of cells or atoms, but rather mentality; in all platonically «self active» singularOf course mind - only partisans do not mean by «mind» just human mind, or even only the mind of cells or atoms, but rather mentality; in all platonically «self active» singularof cells or atoms, but rather mentality; in all platonically «self active» singulars.

Of course, an existentialist interpretation does not ignore this other relation, but, as Bultmann's essay shows, the importance of the world in that interpretation is limited to providing the stage for human lifOf course, an existentialist interpretation does not ignore this other relation, but, as Bultmann's essay shows, the importance of the world in that interpretation is limited to providing the stage for human lifof the world in that interpretation is limited to providing the stage for human life.

Augustine and Aquinas, of course, do argue for a plan in history and for a human end of happiness — and for the reality, if one is not too squeamish to use the word, of heaven.

For Bergson, like many process thinkers (Peirce, James and Dewey come particularly to mind), the entire concept of «necessity» only makes sense when applied internally to abstractions the intellect has already devised.11 Of course, one can tell an evolutionary story about how the human intellect came to be a separable function of consciousness that emphasizes abstraction (indeed, that is what Bergson does in Creative Evolution), but if one were to say that the course of development described in that story had to occur (i.e., necessarily) as it did, then one would be very far from Bergson's view (CE 218, 236, 270of «necessity» only makes sense when applied internally to abstractions the intellect has already devised.11 Of course, one can tell an evolutionary story about how the human intellect came to be a separable function of consciousness that emphasizes abstraction (indeed, that is what Bergson does in Creative Evolution), but if one were to say that the course of development described in that story had to occur (i.e., necessarily) as it did, then one would be very far from Bergson's view (CE 218, 236, 270Of course, one can tell an evolutionary story about how the human intellect came to be a separable function of consciousness that emphasizes abstraction (indeed, that is what Bergson does in Creative Evolution), but if one were to say that the course of development described in that story had to occur (i.e., necessarily) as it did, then one would be very far from Bergson's view (CE 218, 236, 270of consciousness that emphasizes abstraction (indeed, that is what Bergson does in Creative Evolution), but if one were to say that the course of development described in that story had to occur (i.e., necessarily) as it did, then one would be very far from Bergson's view (CE 218, 236, 270of development described in that story had to occur (i.e., necessarily) as it did, then one would be very far from Bergson's view (CE 218, 236, 270).

Of course, many individual economists do care about how income is distributed on the basis of ideas about human beings derived from sources other than their disciplinOf course, many individual economists do care about how income is distributed on the basis of ideas about human beings derived from sources other than their disciplinof ideas about human beings derived from sources other than their discipline.

Of course, as frail humans, that doesn't always work out.

I have not studied the law as a specific topic as I did the human soul, but had to deal with it in the course of my thesis and book on the soul topic.

If this divine causality is insisted upon in the official teaching of the Church in the precise case of the origin of the human soul, that does not of course mean that a divine causality of that kind is found nowhere else.

It will be much harder to do that in the future unless the college administration reverses its present course, calls the faculty and students who have been brutalizing Professor Esolen to order, and reaffirms Providence College's commitment to genuine academic freedom and to a Catholic vision of the human person that challenges the tribalism and identity politics eroding our culture and our politics.

Marx does not deny that human beings are, of course, individuals.

Of course, with humans, even though we decide things, that does not guarantee that it will happen, because we are not in control of everythinOf course, with humans, even though we decide things, that does not guarantee that it will happen, because we are not in control of everythinof everything.

This is all quite sweet, of course, but it does totally obfuscate one essential part of the Deluge account, namely, that God is not willing to tolerate human depravity indefinitely and that human evil will bring destruction upon nature and upon innocent bystanders as well as on the evildoers themselves — a message that might seem particularly appropriate in an age of terrorism and environmental pollution.»

At the same time many of them are oppressed by the feeling that theological study does not sufficiently consider the changes that have taken place in human thought and behavior in the course of a revolutionary century.

Process thought does, of course, attempt to describe how such feelings arise out of previous ones, but it resists the temptation to claim that human feelings can be explained exclusively by reducing them to simpler lower level events.

Of course this still leaves the question of what to do with disappointing human behaviour — the «abuse, «war and addictions... [and that] innocents suffer from the sins of others» as you have put iOf course this still leaves the question of what to do with disappointing human behaviour — the «abuse, «war and addictions... [and that] innocents suffer from the sins of others» as you have put iof what to do with disappointing human behaviour — the «abuse, «war and addictions... [and that] innocents suffer from the sins of others» as you have put iof others» as you have put it.

Of course, churches that do not extend themselves in addressing human need seldom if ever face opposition.

Of course it still does leave us with the problem of disappointing human beings as mentioneOf course it still does leave us with the problem of disappointing human beings as mentioneof disappointing human beings as mentioned.

Of course it is he or she who does the actual celebrating and the preaching; it is his or hers hands, voice, vocabulary, gestures and the like which are the necessary finite human means through which the thing is being done.