«Stories are how
we humans make sense of the world.
Not exact matches
With such a mass
of information, the only way for
humans to
make any
sense of the
world is to
make some approximations and assumptions, to look for the patterns, and try to find the constellations in the mess
of stars.
By this he meant that the
human brain, along with its
senses, and with is learned cultural bias, and even with the extension our scientific instruments gives us, has only
made a rough map in our minds
of the REAL
world (the territory).
nothing
makes the atheist more ticked off more than when you bring up GOD... God gets all the blame for all the tragedy in the
world... If there wasnt a god in the first place,
humans would not know tragedy or injustice when we see it... it would be a non-issue to us... survival
of the fittest would not permit the emotions
of love, compassion, empathy... Darwininian theory could not allow any
of those and many other
of the best
of people's capacity for caring to surface... You cant explain it away by synapse or neurons... without a Supreme Being, there would be no
sense of justice or injustice, we would not call it anything because there is no Ultimate Moral Standard to compare it.
Even if this
made any
sense, there would be plenty
of better eays to get across a message about who is in contol (like creating
humans who already understand that) without
making a
world in which people suffer now and can be sent into eternal punish, ent.
Not just the belief in God, mind you, but the whole
world view in which there is some Grand Plan (note the caps) that
makes any
sense at all
of human history, let alone any valid predictions
of humanity's future.
«Every single
human being who walks on the face
of the earth has a lense that they view the
world through... Since Evolution / Atheism denies the existence
of God and the biblical account
of creation, they have to
make sense of the fossil record and geologic formations somehow.»
Forgetting the idiosyncratic, unspeakably diverse crowds
of strangers, we become drawn through television to the familiar faces, myths and visions
of the American Way
of Life, thereby putting ourselves in touch with a shared vision
of the
human order — a vision that engages our loyalties and
makes sense of our
world.
On the contrary, «fundamentalism has offered ordinary people
of conservative instincts an alternative to liberal faith in
human progress, a way
of making sense out
of the
world, exerting some control over their lives, and creating a way
of life they can believe in.»
In one
sense the discovery
of human individuality was necessary for the development
of human rights, the economic individualism orientated to profit and free market produced the modern economy; the separation
of human being from nature coupled with the autonomy
of the
world of science helped the development
of technology; and the autonomy
of different areas
of life like the arts and the government, each to follow purposes and laws inherent in it, did
make for unfettered creativity in the various fields.
«43 The time, care, and enormous intelligence expended on the process
of producing the Constitution expressed not only the traditional culture
of a covenant - and compact -
making people, perhaps unique in that respect in
human history, but also a
sense of the meaning
of their act on the
world stage.
It's just the natural
human need to try to
make sense of our
world by starting with what is most familiar and going to what is most challenging — that which is least familiar.
But as this unmaking
of religion reveals that religion is «true», in the
sense that it is an invention
of human beings to compensate for and to sublimate their real wretchedness, a second kind
of criticism has to follow: religion has to be
made false, i.e., the secular
world has to be changed.
But the phenomenological description offered
makes it clear that presentational immediacy is consequent upon a particular type
of bodily amplification and selection
of sense data derived from the stream
of consciousness comprising the immediate past actual
world, further abstracted and focused in the
human situation through selective conscious attention to some, but not all,
of the features
of the immediate external
world recorded and amplified by the body.
When various forms
of idolatry became part
of their effort to influence the
world, they were merely trying to tie all things together, to
make sense out
of a
world that often proved hostile to
human feelings.
Even though the image
of God's humility is paradoxical to
human reason, we may be enabled by it to
make much more
sense of our
world than we could without it.
Perhaps aspects
of them, such as their ethical implications, may be compared, but as total approaches to mystery, to
human existence, and to the
world, it
makes little
sense to say that one is clearly better than another.
On the contrary, I should claim, what I have been saying is metaphysical in the second
sense of the word which I proposed in an earlier chapter; it is the
making of wide generalizations on the basis
of experience, with a reference back to verify or «check» the generalizations, a reference which includes not only the specific experience from which it started but also other experiences, both
human and more general, by which its validity may be tested — and the result is not some grand scheme which claims to encompass everything in its sweep, but a vision
of reality which to the one who sees in this way appears a satisfactory, but by no means complete, picture
of how things actually and concretely go in the
world.
Some
of them might allow that correspondence
makes some
sense within the
world of human subjects, while continuing to deny its applicability to the inanimate, objective one.
Without casting Enlightenment rationalism as categorically evil, Wright details some
of the problematic consequences
of Enlightenment assumptions regarding the biblical text: false claims to absolute objectivity, the elevation
of «reason» («not as an insistence that exegesis must
make sense with an overall view
of God and the wider
world,» Wright notes, «but as a separate «source» in its own right»), reductive and skeptical readings
of scripture that cast Christianity as out -
of - date and irrelevant, a
human - based eschatology that fosters a «we - know - better - now» attitude toward the text, a reframing
of the problem
of evil as a mere failure to be rational, the reduction
of the act
of God in Jesus Christ to a mere moral teacher, etc..
Inadequate as they are, subject to modification from time to time, needing correction and supplementation, our various
human languages (verbal and pictorial, aural or graphic) are both necessary for us and useful to us; they help to
make sense of, and they help to give
sense to, the richness
of experience and the given - ness
of the
world as we observe and grasp it.
Although Hasker concludes this argument by pointing out that for it too «it is God who is responsible for the existence
of creatures who have the freedom and power to bring about great evils,» I had explicitly said that «God is responsible for [the distinctively
human forms
of evil on our planet] in the
sense of having encouraged the
world in the direction that
made these evils possible» (Process 75; cf. God 308 - 09).
«We recognise that just as all truth rests in the Word
of God, through whom all things were
made and through Whom all thing will come to their completion, so too the construction
of a true
human ecology can only be achieved in relationship to the Word -LSB-...] we can see and
sense the echoing
of that eternally spoken Word in so much
of the created
world around us -LSB-... which Word is] expressed in all those actions and events which
make up the history
of salvation -LSB-...] we recognise most centrally that this eternal Word
of God, in whom all things
makes sense, finds flesh in the person
of Jesus
of Nazareth who then becomes its fullest expression and true presence in the
world -LSB-...] the centre
of true
human ecology is the person
of Christ.»
We develop young leaders who are committed to social and environmental justice and are equipped with a
sense of awe for natural and
human beauty, tools for non-violent multicultural community building, as well as the confidence to
make positive change in our families, communities and
world.
In our day - to - day lives,
humans are bombarded with so much information that we regularly resort to «perceptual shorthand» to
make sense of the
world.
Researchers have identified a powerful
human motive that has not been adequately appreciated by social and behavioral scientists: the drive to
make sense of our lives and the
world around us.
Creating machines that can see the
world and
make sense of images as
humans do is one
of the «hard problems» in artificial intelligence.
From her insights she has forged a bold, if still controversial, theory
of «core knowledge,» which asserts that all
humans are born with basic cognitive skills that let them
make sense of the
world.
Co-author Professor Daniel Mills
of the School
of Life Sciences at the University
of Lincoln, said: «
Humans are known to be very visual in both intra and inter-specific interactions, and because the vision of dogs is much poorer than humans, we often tend to think of them using their other senses to make sense of the
Humans are known to be very visual in both intra and inter-specific interactions, and because the vision
of dogs is much poorer than
humans, we often tend to think of them using their other senses to make sense of the
humans, we often tend to think
of them using their other
senses to
make sense of the
world.
He and his colleagues argue that today's better understanding
of the pace
of evolution,
human adaptability and the way the mind works all suggest that, contrary to cartoon stereotypes, modern
humans are not just primitive savages struggling to
make psychological
sense of an alien contemporary
world.
Humans do a lot
of guessing to
make sense of the
world, even though we now have books and the internet to help us.
The efficacy and necessity
of these drugs has long been debated in the natural health
world — mainly questioning whether the absolute benefit
of the drug justifies the lifetime prescription or whether the approach
of «blocking» cholesterol
makes sense given that cholesterol is vital for so many other areas
of human health — but for those that do decide to take Lipitor, Crestor or other statins, it's important to consider the drug's other effects on the body.
It is the vehicle through which
humans can
make sense of our
world and ourselves.
Putting people in boxes or categories is a natural
human way to
make sense of the
world we live in.
Women eager to
make sense of the
world who are occasionally struck with
human guilt, a
sense of culpability in the earth's deterioration.
Kockroach says
of the
human world that it
makes perfect
sense to him.
BookRiot contributor who writes about romance novels Interview starts at 10:59 and ends at 42:21 We're sort
of worshipping at the temple
of love, the same way that religion can help us
make sense of human experience and help us to feel there's good in the
world — there's a structure that is bending towards the good.
13 This sentiment recurs in Sculpture and Touch, the book Jaeger shared in her studio: «Sculpture is formed
of a narrow and specific history, concerned with processes
of making and informed by the ways in which
human beings use objects to attempt to
make sense of the surrounding
world.
Storytelling is coded in our DNA, it's how people
make sense of the
world and an integral part
of the
human experience.
Sculpture is formed
of a narrow and specific history, concerned with processes
of making and informed by the ways in which
human beings use objects to attempt to
make sense of the surrounding
world.
Does it
make sense to ban
human CO2 in America when Western Europe cheats and when Brazil, Russia, India, China and all
of the developing and Third
World likens climatelogy to the ancient science
of astrology?
But judging the
human world on the basis
of comments to blogs
makes about as much
sense as judging the physical
world on the bogus (yes, bogus) predictions
made by the Met Office.
Making the
world's (mostly non --RRB- reaction all the more tragic, in the
sense of a horrific outcome due to ineradicable
human flaws.
The «scientific method» may not be perfect — it's a
human system after all — but it is arguably the best that we have come up so far for trying to
make sense of the material
world.
Since the dawn
of human communication, storytelling has served as mankind's tool
of choice for
making sense of the
world around them.
Human beings
of all colours rely on their
senses of sight, hearing, taste, touch, and smell to
make sense of the
world around them.
As infants and toddlers, children learn the basics
of human interaction, including how to regulate their emotions, communicate with others, and generally
make sense of the
world.