Sentences with phrase «humans think when»

Why do you care about what other humans think when you care nothing about how God your Creator thinks?

They are keenly aware of the inherently flawed nature of human thinking when left unchecked.»

Not exact matches

When my client started thinking about what his various audiences needed from him, his communication got a lot more relevant and meaningful — and more human.

The results of the experiment would suggest that bird flu could potentially mutate to become transmittable between humans like the flu, a scary thought considering the human fatality rate from bird flu when contracted from birds was recorded as 60 percent in 2010.

«We all are human, we all have weaknesses... I think when you look at a struggle in your life, just know that's just an opportunity for your character to grow.

Just think of the emotional difference when a customer reads a well - written, well - structured, heartfelt response versus one that lacks any human element.

Forbes «Matt Herper has a thought - provoking essay up on the tragic human costs that often fly under the radar when we discuss drug pricing.

«I think people's intuitions do just really break down when they're pushed to these limits because we've never dealt with entities that are smarter than humans on this planet.»

«I think the self - driving car has the opportunity to not only improve productivity for the people in the car, which will be a huge economic boost for those people; Not only has the opportunity to save lives — over a million people die worldwide in road deaths today caused by human drivers, and I think we can take that very close to zero, which is very good for both human welfare and for economic productivity — it's a very serious dent in productivity when people get killed; And then all the ancillary industries that end up getting built out.»

But when it comes to human behavior and thinking differently about a certain set of widely acknowledged facts, there can be an edge.

Sometimes I think the fatal flaw of humans reduces to our unwillingness to give a crap about the future (inequality, recession, melting icecaps) when we can have something today.

When thinking of an account, you must consider the humans you're trying to contact.

When news hit Wednesday that Oscar Mayer will be pulling out of Madison, East Principal Michael Hernandez thought of all of those connections, plus the sheer human toll.

CHARLIE MUNGER: Well, when you start to think about it, business quality usually counts on something more than whether you crossed the T in some old lease or something and the human quality of the management who are going to stay are very important.

Aer you saying that you don't believe that a god is monitoring every thought, word, and action of every human for the purpose of judgement when life ends?

@In Santa we trust - «Are you saying that you don't believe that a god is monitoring every thought, word, and action of every human for the purpose of judgement when life ends?»

When I ask them, «How many of you think something in addition to evolution accounts for humans being on earth as we now exist?»

So, by your reasoning, if «People put so much importance on words» (implying that they don't matter and we shouldn't take thought of how we use them) then I ought to be able to sing along with the lyrics from pac's «hit»em up» with my black friends, curse in a kindergarten class as well as a corporate meeting for my boss... what impression would a client have of my boss if I were cussing in a professional meeting or at a charity event... it doesn't add up, it's a cop - out rebuttal... trying to find loopholes or applying «human reasoning» like» ll take a swearing guy who's helpful» doesn't change Jesus or scripture it's just setting up a what - if scenario and trying to allow that to in some way justify your stance when again, that doesn't change The Holy Spirit or His heart in those who have been born again... the verses (inspired by His own Spirit) speak for themselves.

And how do you even defend yourself against such a barrage when someone thinks it's their human right to foul the air with any kind of language they «damn well» please, anytime they feel like it?

There's Arkansas, bounty hunters, snakes real, human, and symbolic, being rescued from a snake pit by a very errant knight, a display of the gratuitous slaughter that comes when you take the law in your own hands, a deep commentary on place, displacement, the state of nature, and the techno - forces of the modern world and modern government, solidly American thoughts on law, property, justice, and keeping your word, and so forth and so on.

Are you saying that you don't believe that a god is monitoring every thought, word, and action of every human for the purpose of judgement when life ends?

He is reading St. Augustine in the light of his own phenomenology when he speaks of God entering into the human heart unbidden and awakening its deepest aspirations long before we have had any thought about God.

We have been chasing our tails for a long time when it comes to self - knowledge, and the whole human / non-human distinction evades us, especially when we are attempting to be «objective,» because we tend to think that true objectivity is possible and even desirable, when in fact true objectivity doesn't exist.

Later, when interviewed in a 2006 article in the New York Times Sunday magazine about current religious thinking on artificial contraception, Mohler elaborated: «I can not imagine any development in human history, after the Fall, that has had a greater impact on human beings than the Pill....

You know, when I think about «empire» — Roman or Egyptian or Chinese or Russian or American — and consider both accomplishments and damage inflicted (human and otherwise), and then think about what Christianity might have to say on the subject, the first thing that comes to mind is «to whom much has been given, from him much will be required.»

Yes — and I think there is something in our human nature that is about survival that while a good and necessary thing to have can when mixed with none of us being perfect lead us to perceptions and magical thinking which may or may not be in touch with reality.

And when you think others are stupid to be «religious», how stupid are you to limit yourself to this one planet, when there are billions up there, all connected by God's Galactic Internet, no big bang, no beginning, no end, forever, billions of souls traveling the ever - changing universe, in and out of various human - like bodies, on and off of different earth - like planets.

It is easier to defend the idea that the bible is not the word of god, but simply a history of human thought and just as we discard old scientific ideas when we have new information, we discard old philosophical ideas.

so did the human pair when they chose to believe him over their Creator but the time is about up for that rule when the true God «brings to ruin those ruining the earth», Rev. 11:18 I know it is just a story but thought you may want to know..

And when you think through and appreciate «how imperfect humans are», you should realize that the «perfect» deity, that Christians claim created humans, obviously does not exist.

These gifts combined with a free university education to so many people for whom there were then no appropriate jobs, as well as a civil war, led to the failure of the experiment failed, but in a time when it is clear, at least to me, that global pursuit of more and more wealth is suicidal for the human race, I think it would be worthwhile to study such efforts.

Nonetheless, human beings are naturally religious when by that we mean that they possess, by virtue of their given ontological being, a complex set of innate features, capacities, powers, limitations, and tendencies that give them the capacity to think, perceive, feel, imagine, desire, and act religiously and that under the right conditions tend to predispose and direct them toward religion.

Usually when theologians say that the Bible is a human book, they mean that the Bible has human authors who use human words to discuss human ideas to human readers with human ways of thinking.

No, when I think about God being redeemed, I am referring specifically to how we humans have tried to use Scripture, theology, and tradition to tie God down into a box.

63 When bloody flooding killed the human race And brand - new oceans put man in his place, Except for those who carried mankind's seed, I, first of creatures, snubbed what law decreed, While I mocked yielding to the Lord's command, For which, I think, a poet would declare, «The sin....

The seventh lecture of William James's pragmatism series bore the title «Pragmatism and Humanism,» and included the statement: «When we talk of reality «independent» of human thinking, then, it seems a thing very hard to find.»

We think that individuals are better off when the human and natural communities of which they are a part are healthy, and that the health of these communities is what policy should aim at.

On the contrary, it is a sad commentary on human kind when they no longer think they need their creator.

It just seems that people like Hawking ignore religion completely when a HUGE part of science is questioning all beliefs including your own which I don't think human beings do as much as they should, or respect other people's opinions.

First, its premisses concerning society and modern man are pseudoscientific: for example, the affirmation that man has become adult, that he no longer needs a Father, that the Father - God was invented when the human race was in its infancy, etc.; the affirmation that man has become rational and thinks scientifically, and that therefore he must get rid of the religious and mythological notions that were appropriate when his thought processes were primitive; the affirmation that the modern world has been secularized, laicized, and can no longer countenance religious people, but if they still want to preach the kerygma they must do it in laicized terms; the affirmation that the Bible is of value only as a cultural document, not as the channel of Revelation, etc. (I say «affirmation» because these are indeed simply affirmations, unrelated either to fact or to any scientific knowledge about modern man or present - day society.)

The revelatory permission has been utilized only when the human record and human concepts failed to supply an adequate thought pattern.

Given a really deep insight into the concept of collectivity, we are bound, I think, to understand the term without any attenuation of meaning, and certainly as no mere metaphor, when we apply it to the sum of all human beings.

When we think of the awful need of humanity at this hour, it seems almost grotesque to turn to the church for help, if by the church we mean not some idealization, but the actual human organizations we know.

«I think when Cain killed Abel, it showed that much death and misery was to be done by humans killing humans.

I have often thought, particularly when working in the diocesan marriage tribunal, that our acknowledgement of the fact of Original Sin gives us such a head start when it comes to understanding human nature, and why people act the way they do.

We must understand that when a man considers violence the only resort left him, when he sees it, not as a remedy and the harbinger of a new day, but as at least an indictment of the old, unjust order, when he thinks of violence as a way of affirming his outraged human dignity (his pride!)

Within the extremely narrow sliver of time when human beings have occupied centre - stage on world history, why is it that this issue has come to dominate our thoughts and actions?

Religious people speak of God when human knowledge (perhaps simply because they are too lazy to think) come to an end, or when human resources fall — in fact it is always the deus ex machina that they bring on to the scene, either for the apparent solution of insoluble problems, or as strength in human failure — always, that is to say, exploiting human weakness or human boundaries.11

Therefore, when we set about to think morally about immigration, we do well to keep in mind Gertrude Himmelfarb's observation about our essential human needs.

When more knowledge was stored in books than ever before, the human mind was freed for other tasks & thinking was freed to be more abstract and specialised.