Sentences with phrase «husband paying support»

That goal had been achieved through the husband paying support since 2007; the job loss now had nothing to do with the marriage or its breakdown.

Not exact matches

He asks, «Does religion in general and Protestantism in particular oppose or support the emergence of the new father — the father committed to egalitarianism in the home on issues of paid employment for both wife and husband, child care and domestic chores?»

My ex husband has not kept insurance on the kids, has not paid child support, has not paid anything actually, does not always see the kids on visitation, has physically abused them.

For several years I supported my writing habit through a variety of dull, poorly - paid, and sometimes horrible jobs (the weirdest was probably my stint as a research assistant / housekeeper / dogsbody for an egomaniacal self - help author whose elderly husband spent much of his time in the basement with his huge collection of Hustler magazines).

I'm currently «depending on my husband's income» while I work part - time and write... but he has that income stream because I supported us for years, allowing him to develop professionally, and start the business which now pays our bills.

Payments to third parties for the benefit of your ex can also be support depending on the circumstances, e.g., the wife was a stay - at - home mom and had credit card debt but no job to repay it so the husband is ordered to pay it.

She couldn't rely on her husband to pay her support, and the house would give her income when and if she was ever ready to sell it.

No evidence was filed in support, though the wife later added a sworn affidavit which stated that the husband had not paid the money which he had been ordered to pay, as happens with the present procedure under CSA 1991.

Fairfax, VA (Law Firm Newswire) April 2, 2015 — A woman from the Richmond area was recently ordered to pay spousal support to her husband, a man who had attacked her with a hammer and who was later convicted of a felony.

The concept of the WD suit is that, had the widow's husband not been killed, he would have continued supporting her and their children, but now he was dead, and dead men don't pay the bills.

Vancouver Spousal Support Pre Tax Profits summarize the key parts of this weeks Sigurdson v Sigurdson where a wife sought to have her husband's half share of additional pre tax profits earned by a business he owned with his brother added to his income to increase the spousal support he had to pSupport Pre Tax Profits summarize the key parts of this weeks Sigurdson v Sigurdson where a wife sought to have her husband's half share of additional pre tax profits earned by a business he owned with his brother added to his income to increase the spousal support he had to psupport he had to pay her.

Later, however, the husband brought an application under the Divorce Act to vary this order, claiming that the spousal support he paid to the wife should be reduced, and ultimately should end completely as of August 31, 2010.

The motions judge concluded that the wife still had a need for support and the husband still had an ability to pay, and focused on that portion of the husband's income that had not been the subject of division with the wife in the past.

Can a Virginia court order a devoted and financially responsible husband to pay spousal support to his adulterous wife based merely on a gross disparity in income?

I agree with her conclusion that the un-equalized portion of the husband's pension was a principal consideration in the support to be paid.

Husband and wife entered into a written separation agreement for a no fault divorce and a pendente lite consent order under which husband paid wife spousal support of $ 7,000 a month.

The order also stated that the husband was to pay # 270,000 annually as child support.

The husband unsuccessfully tried to pay up the arrears of support at the last minute but the court was unimpressed and ordered him to pay more as he had breached the deal and deprived the wife of what she had bargained for in the original Vancouver separation agreement.

After separation, the husband was ordered to pay the wife spousal support in the amount of $ 800 per month for an indefinite period of time.

Even if the contract had allowed the husband to avoid any equalization payment, a court would likely have awarded the wife support in an amount totalling what the husband eventually paid her by way of settlement.

Those sections provides a list of factors that the court must consider whether ordering the amount of temporary support the husband had to pay the wife in this case.

One of them was the consideration of the husband's means, and his corresponding ability pay support in all the circumstances.

In this case, the judge determined that the husband could stop paying spousal support to the wife because his retirement was reasonable and he should have been given a chance to enjoy his golden years.

If the children reside with you and you are the primary caregiver, your husband has an obligation to pay child support.

Third, the agreement did not provide an adequate level of child support in accordance with shared care under the Child Support Guidelines, nor did it require the husband to pay any of the children's s. 7 exsupport in accordance with shared care under the Child Support Guidelines, nor did it require the husband to pay any of the children's s. 7 exSupport Guidelines, nor did it require the husband to pay any of the children's s. 7 expenses.

The equitable parent doctrine applies to those situations where a child was conceived and born in wedlock, and the non-biological husband seeks custody of the child as he is willing to assume all rights (custody and parenting time) and obligations (paying child support) that a biological father would have.

Finally, as the agreement was no longer in effect, the husband was once again required to pay a higher, interim, spousal support sum which had been ordered prior to the Agreement being reached.

A judge has ordered American singer Mary J. Blige to pay her estranged husband Martin «Kendu» Isaacs $ 30,000 per month in temporary spousal support, in the latest chapter of the pair... Read More

More puzzling was the apparently agreed position of the parties that 65 % of the husband's net income was being paid to the wife in combined child and spousal support.

In addition, she will be paid spousal support in the amount of $ 240,000 per year, to continue unless she remarries or predeceases her husband.

If my ex husband has less than 40 % of time with son and is paying support, why did the government give him half of my baby bonus and is telling g me I owe half back?

Tsige claimed that she was involved in a financial dispute with the appellant's former husband and accessed the accounts to confirm whether he was paying child support to the appellant.

After pointing out that the husband would have an easier time satisfying his hefty support arrears without a bankruptcy trustee in the way — and after taking pains to clarify that such a discharge would have no effect on the wife's support entitlement (since by law a discharge does not release a person from child / spousal support or maintenance obligation arising under a court order), the court ordered him to pay $ 25,000 to the trustee immediately.

In Innes v. Innes, the 62 - year old support - paying husband decided to take voluntary early retirement, which meant his income would decrease from $ 200,000 to about $ 70,000 per year.

When the husband filed for divorce, he was ordered to pay temporary support for the couple's three children, but fell into heavy arrears.

In McCowan, the wife's support claim was dismissed in a consent order which also required the husband to pay the wife a monthly sum to compensate her for a pension she had been receiving, to which she lost the right when she married.

Just a few weeks ago, the British Columbia Supreme Court in Falconer v. Falconer, 2017 BCSC 2355 addressed a case where the husband applied for an order terminating spousal support and reducing child support he was required to pay to the wife pursuant to a consent order dating back to January 2014.

The appellant wife appealed an order terminating the husband's obligation to pay spousal support and maintain her as a beneficiary of his life insurance past his retirement date of June 1, 2016 at age 70.

As the voluntary support paid to the wife formed the foundation of the trial judge's refusal to order retroactive support, the husband was not entitled to receive a further credit towards ongoing support.

My ex husband who is currently married has told me he is going to stop paying the current Court ordered child support payment of $ 566 and only pay $ 100.

Mr. MacLean succeeded in having the court use all of the companies pre-tax profits for the SSAG calculation based on BCCA law from the cases of Klukas and Teja, defeating the husband's spousal support claim that double dipping applied to BC spousal support and a lower BC spousal and BC child support payment should thus be paid, blocking any $ 350,000 cap argument where BC spousal support is not increased on high salaries above $ 350,000 per year and finally in having the child support portion of the order made retroactive so a large lump sum payment was received for the children's benefit.

[47] In Young, Saunders J. found that the husband's early retirement did not relieve him of the obligation to pay spousal support.

Instead of dividing the military pension with an order complying with the Qualified Domestic Relations Order provisions, the husband agreed in an atypical Property Settlement Agreement to pay to wife one - half of of his monthly military pension as spousal support or alimony, without a separate court order or any election of survivor benefits.

For example, if the husband is required to pay support, he may also be required to obtain a life insurance policy and name his spouse as irrevocable beneficiary of the policy so that if he dies, the spouse will have sufficient funds for his or her support.

In an unpublished opinion, the Virginia Court of Appeals affirmed a Circuit Court judge's award of fifty percent (50 %) of a husband's net military retirement pay and spousal support where the wife was living on credit cards, social security, and food stamps.

Although a Roanoke City Circuit Court ordered husband, who has been under guardianship of his mother and then his brother beginning in 1968, in 2001 to pay $ 250 in monthly spousal support after his 1993 Virginia divorce from wife and...

Alternatively, a husband or wife may agree in a separation agreement or property settlement agreement to pay the mortgage in lieu of paying support until the property is sold or refinanced at some point in the future when values increase, and then begin paying support to the other spouse or former spouse.

In the separation agreement, the husband agreed to pay to wife $ 6,000 a month in spousal support with the following condition:

In 2000, the husband had been ordered by the court to pay $ 800 in monthly spousal support to the wife.

The husband claimed that in the circumstances, 12 years of paying support had been enough: he was now 56 years old and retired (he took an early retirement option as part of his termination due from a long - held job due to downsizing), and was two part - time jobs earning about $ 10 an hour.