Not exact matches
And if it sounds too fast to
make a genuinely readable product, well,
hybrid publishers would disagree.
«Whether it's words or flavored chips or pop music, at some point a factory will
make it,» says one small - business owner in Chicago who was recently approached by a
hybrid publisher.
Are you surprised by the big difference the type of
publisher can
make for
hybrid authors?
Literary readers rely heavily on reviews to
make their reading choices, so I would encourage
hybrid / indie writers to try to secure reviews from respected review journals like Kirkus or
Publishers Weekly.
Hybrid, though my publishers were more boutique than true traditional, one made me feel like I was just indie — does that still count as h
Hybrid, though my
publishers were more boutique than true traditional, one
made me feel like I was just indie — does that still count as
hybridhybrid?
The key messages here, presented at the conference by Writers Digest's Phil Sexton, are that «
hybrid authors» — engaged in both self - publishing and traditional publishing —
make more money from writing, engage in more social - media tactics to support their writing, and are the least impressed with traditional
publishers.
The
hybrid authors surveyed reported themselves to be more motivated by money than the others and less impressed with
publishers» ability to add any value by
making a book «more like what the market wants.»
The
Hybrid Publisher Criteria has a different objective: to provide people with information about an emerging business model so they can
make informed decisions when deciding which company to use to publish their work.
At the same time, the author should be learning about the other options (DIY, publishing service companies,
hybrid publishers, etc.) and even
making connections and obtaining the financial data for those options.
Another self - publishing frontrunner, Hugh Howey, who breaks his silence after a survey done by Digital Book World shows how self -
publishers earn comparing how 1.8 % of them only
made $ 100,000 with 8.8 % of traditionally published authors and 13.2 % of
hybrid authors.
The deal for self
publishers is just too good and
publishers response is to
make their terms worse and worse (I mean I'm hearing this from so many many authors) um offering worse and worse deals to try and stop authors from being
hybrid is so not going to work for you guys.
If this is becoming the new norm,
publishers asking for more rights, paying smaller advances, taking forever to
make a decision on buying a manuscript, and delivering less marketing and promotion then expecting authors / agents to pick up the slack, I'm not sure how I'm going to keep convincing my
hybrid authors to stay the course with traditional
publishers when they are
making more money self - publishing.
One way would be to compare
hybrids with those who have been traditionally published, as both groups represent the top fraction of two different freely
made decisions: the decision to either query an agent /
publisher or to self - publish.
Today, as self - publishing, e-books, print on demand,
hybrid publishing, and an ever - increasing number of other options
make it possible for anyone to publish — or at least print — books, the precise definition of «independent
publisher» seems to have grown blurry to some — but not to us.