Sentences with phrase «hydrology not»

Gov. Kitzhaber can afford to bash coal because Oregon, endowed with geography and hydrology not occurring in Appalachia and the Midwest, derives 75 % of its electricity from zero - carbon hydropower.

Not exact matches

I do not quite know how to save this figure of spiritual hydrology for the Kingdom of God without a bit of silliness.

The scientists warn that climate change threatens these habitats, not only from rising temperatures increasing peat decomposition, but also via altered rainfall patterns — with summer droughts drastically affecting the blanket bog hydrology.

That fact is scientifically supported and not controversial among scientists who study climate from a broad range of disciplines, including geology, geophysics, geography, paleoclimatology, glaciology, hydrology, ecology, evolutionary biology, environmental studies and oceanography.

However, it is also prudent to plan in the event that this does not occur,» says Chris Huntingfordthe UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology.

Causeways and other roads that bisect wetlands alter natural habitats by providing avenues by which invasive plants species can colonize wetlands and nesting areas, altering natural hydrology of wetland systems, altering storm water runoff and drainage, providing avenues for road salts and pollutants and the direct loss of habitat due to land - clearing and paving.

Although the sites aren't ideal for the tortoises now, detailed modeling of rainfall, temperature, swamp hydrology, and tortoise biology predict they will be in half a century.

«Our methods have relied on traditional, rain - based hydrology: storing water, then moving it to where Mother Nature hasn't provided it.

«Their hydrology is often near enough intact because the deeper layers have not been disturbed,» he says.

The answer does not depend on the weather alone but on the land surface, local hydrology, management,... and ultimately who and what is in harms way.

The hydrology simply wasn't scaling to size.

But as Hank also notes, this isn't a global average, maybe as you say changes in hydrology contributed.

Wick / wicking is an expression of lay people not in Hydrology books but is mentioned today in 22,910 issued patents by the USPTO.

However, I am not optimistic — the specifics of the small scale physics (aerosol indirect effects on clouds, sea ice formation, soil hydrology etc.) are so heterogeneous that I don't see how you can do without calculating the details.

The analyses to date have been limited to the Jason ground track coverage between 66 ° S and 66 ° N, regions where Argo has profiled 900 m or deeper, and areas away from coasts in order to limit potential leakage of land hydrology into the GRACE gravity signals...

There is not wick / wicking in Hydrology literature since it has compliances with thermodynamics and the functioning of oil lamps is like a kite to aerodynamics.

There are around 22,000 issued patents on wick / wicking near worthless coming from lay people not in Hydrology.

The lengthy delay in getting papers published at the Journal of Hydrology is simply out of my control and I do not think it is incumbent on the USGS to add a disclaimer on every press release that additional papers have been published since the acceptance of the paper that either support or are contrary to its findings.

I did not think that particularly worthy of a response, so I concentrated on the hopefully implied question about land ice and hydrology.

The study, led by José Miguel Azañón of the University of Granada and Rosa Maria Mateos from the Spanish Geological Survey, published in the Journal of Hydrology, is based on data that the authors say «are not alarming, and do not imply any risk at the moment.

Detailed studies at the State Hydrology Institute in St. Petersburg allow one to assume that biogenic methane emission in the Russian permafrost zone can not increase by more than 20 %, or at the most 30 %, compared to the current level, which would cause global warming by 0.01 degrees Celsius by 2050.

The hydrology is not the problem.

Blith, when local sea levels have not risen and in some places actually fallen since 1950, regardless of the hydrology, then please explain how SLR can possibly have accelerated?

* Clouds — since when is it likely that clouds don't change when hydrology for one thing changes all the time.

A sentence in Chapter 13 of the 2007 IPCC Fourth Assessment Report on Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability states: «Up to 40 percent of the Amazonian forests could react drastically to even a slight reduction in precipitation; this means that the tropical vegetation, hydrology and climate system in South America could change very rapidly to another steady state, not necessarily producing gradual changes between the current and the future situation.»

I imagine that if it weren't for the hydrology cycle they might, but then they would be dead wouldn't they?

Perhaps you could learn from someone who has actually worked on these things — well not mountain mines as we don't have mountains in Queensland — at any rate someone whose scientific speciality is hydrology, sedimentology and biogeochemical cycling in fluvial, marine and hyrogeological systems — but you show little sign of learning anything.

This presentation contains a brief history of the study of the HK pragmaticity, from where it can be seen that the widest use of HK ideas is made in electronic networks and not in hydrology.

HSJ has already published numerous papers on climate and hydrology, not only «orthodox» ones but also with different views.

In hydrology and water resources engineering, in real - time simulations that are used for future projections in transient systems (in contrast to steady - state simulations), it is inconceivable to neglect the initial conditions; likewise, it is inconceivable to claim that a model has good prediction skill for half a century ahead but not for a decade ahead.

The close relationship of LTP with hydrology is historical, rather than science - based — and not exclusive.

Causality in climate and hydrology is not sequential and one - to - one but rather circular (due to feedbacks) and many - to - many (due to complexity).

The piece about the Greenland ice sheet had not a peep about the effect of geothermal activity under the ice sheet and the basal melting that is occurring driving the vigorous subglacial hydrology as outlined in Rogozhina et al, 2016.

Many of the most important impacts of global warming will probably not be the actual changes in temperature, but the associated changes in hydrology.

I don't know — in Australian hydrology we have drought and flood dominated regimes caused by these patterns that I have been thinking about for decades.

Also, forcings calculated in this manner are not as easy to compute as conventional radiative forcings, nor are they as comparable among different GCMs because of differences in model dynamics and hydrology.

Spatial detrending not involving time is common in problems in geology, hydrology, soil science, agronomy, etc..

(The original was is published in Russian in Soviet Meteorology & Hydrology Vol6.1 and isn't on - line.)

2) The majority of those having meteological background in the U.S. are global warming skeptics... they don't understand that global warming is happening yet they haven't taken the time to investigate and see that it is, and their background in other earth sciences, including hydrology, is limited.

They're not doing what they should be doing in a time of global crisis... then they fired me for wanting to do what I believed was my job — to evaluate and take account of climate changes on the hydrology within the NC states of the U.S. for modeling and flood prediction purposes.

These include not only the chemistry, but also the ecology, hydrology, and geomorphology of the various portions of a watershed and that of the receiving system.

Of course things are not as simple as this with many other factors such as nutrient supply, surface solar insolation and wind speed coming into play as can be seen in the model studies of Herb et al. (Journal of Hydrology (2008) 356, 327 — 343).

«Up to 40 % of the Amazonian forests could react drastically to even a slight reduction in precipitation; this means that the tropical vegetation, hydrology and climate system in South America could change very rapidly to another steady state, not necessarily producing gradual changes between the current and the future situation (Rowell and Moore, 2000).»

The contested IPCC statement reads: «Up to 40 % of the Amazonian forests could react drastically to even a slight reduction in precipitation; this means that the tropical vegetation, hydrology and climate system in South America could change very rapidly to another steady state, not necessarily producing gradual changes between the current and the future situation (Rowell and Moore, 2000).»

If you do commission a hydrology report there is a risk that it may not support your case.

I'm not entirely sure, though, why Facebook believes me to be similarly curious about spring hydrology, «pockets,» and dragons.

It's not only the cities that are concerned with hydrology.