Not exact matches
Multiplied by the decreasing density
with altitude (the other half), there is always just enough pressure for the lower layers of the atmosphere to hold up the upper layers and so on up leading to lower and lower pressure
with altitude as there is less and less mass above each layer (
hydrostatic equilibrium).
In his 2007 paper, Miskolczi (still screwed up on Kirchhoff's Law) goes overboard
with his misunderstanding of the virial theorem, radiation pressure (he left out the light speed «c» factor), and
hydrostatic equilibrium.
Caballero even goes so far in Sec. 2.3.1 to write: «Overall, it can safely be stated that atmospheric motions
with horizontal scales > 10 km are always in
hydrostatic equilibrium.»
He incorrect asserts that the
hydrostatic equilibrium state
with a lapse rate is true thermodynamic
equilibrium and would be present in an isolated gas after a very long time.
Suppose you prepare the gas in
hydrostatic equilibrium (so it is in perfect force balance) but
with a thermal lapse.
1) Start by computing the total GHG - free air constant mass per unit area of a gas layer between any two heights under gravity g 2) Add in the
hydrostatic equilibrium pressure change
with height in the gravity field 3) Compute the total enthalpy per unit area of the layer realizing the layer possesses potential energy per unit area in earth's gravity field 4) From that, realize energy conservation imposes a constraint that total dry static energy is constant in the layer (within adiabatic control volume) 5) From this, realize and compute the total entropy (S) of the layer over the height of the layer 6) Transform S computation from height to pressure by way of
hydrostatic eqn.
Because we are starting
with hydrostatic equilibrium, then the buoyant force is equal to the gravitational force.
In fact, a gas
with a DALR is a fairly special case of the many «
equilibria» one can reach in the specific limit of hydrodynamic relaxation (only) to a state of
hydrostatic balance neglecting the much slower thermal relaxation that eventually makes the gas isothermal.
If you want, I'd be happy to help you out and show you, or you can continue to argue as if
hydrostatic equilibrium is itself a unique state, the one
with the DALR.
The maximum entropy state is the thermodynamic
equilibrium state is the isothermal
hydrostatic solution, not the
hydrostatic solution
with the DALR or any other initial thermal gradient.
So S (34), originally formulated from different considerations (although again involving
hydrostatic equilibrium), is consistent
with independent energy considerations.