What sickens me is
the hypocrisy of people who claim to be in favour of speech, claim to believe in empiricism, claim to be sceptics yet refuse to accept room for an honest, open debate on one of the most important political issues of our time.
You say «What sickens me is
the hypocrisy of people who claim to be in favour of speech, claim to believe in empiricism, claim to be sceptics yet refuse to accept room for an honest, open debate on one of the most important political issues of our time.»
Again,
the hypocrisy of these people is so appalling it is disgusting.
I never tire of the irony and
hypocrisy of people attacking someone b / c they «attacked» someone else.
The hypocrisy of you people is laughable.
I mean,
the hypocrisy of these people is beyond belief!!
I put that list in there just to show
the hypocrisy of a person labeling someone else that disagrees with their stance on gay marriage as a hate filled bigot.
Not exact matches
«The lack
of investment, the greed, incompetence, corruption,
hypocrisy and downright arrogance
of people who put their interests ahead
of the public's,» writes O'Shea, have decimated the newspaper sector more than the Internet ever could have.
One
of the things I've done in my work is kind
of show the
hypocrisy of progressive
people who say they believe in inequality, but when it comes to their individual choices about where they're going to live and where they're going to send their children, they make very different decisions, and I just didn't want to do that.
The
hypocrisy of the religious zealots is revolting, they speak as if their history is pure as the driven snow and that
people like me are the evil ones.
Some
of us post here because
of the religulous predilection for s.exual repression and
hypocrisy, which I never get tired
of pointing out to
people.
You however don't see your own
hypocrisy in greater depth when you say that the bible was deliberately written to be sacred and holy, without ANY sourcing and you take the word
of people who lived a really long time ago who also can not provide you with anything more than «eye - witness accounts» which have undoubtedly been changed, tweaked or even just falsly made up in order to cement their point.
As I mention above, the issue needs to be raised to believers and non-believers alike: How can a nation
of people miss the outright
hypocrisy of using a belief system ostensibly predicated on compassion, charity and humility to argue in favour
of genocide?
I am VERY tired
of people preaching to me and others about how «a Christian would and should act» when the
hypocrisy of the matter is that I, a «none believer» practice «The Golden Rule» more than most!
Dunn acknowledged Vanderbilt's history in Tennessee but said his response shows how
people are tired
of «injustice» and «
hypocrisy.»
Well, I guess atheists lose, then, as they all lazily sit back, drink alcohol, smoke weed, and bully
people of religion, calling them hypocrites while not showing their own moral standards so that their own
hypocrisy can be judged.
Rep. Bill Dunn thinks
people are tired
of «injustice» and «
hypocrisy?»
How can a nation
of people miss the outright
hypocrisy of using a belief system ostensibly predicated on compassion, charity and humility to argue in favour
of genocide?
But, alas, we have to hear that
people are bad for this and going here after they die for that from a bunch
of people who practice an encouraged form
of hypocrisy.
People who claim to follow Christ but find all kinds
of excuses not to act Christ - like need to be exposed for their
hypocrisy.
I'm arguing that there's a great deal
of hypocrisy and elitism in this debate, and that the world's a better place when
people are honest and authentic.
And your spellbook calling nonbelievers pigs is part
of the reason so many
people see the sheer arrogance and
hypocrisy in your mythology.
Is
hypocrisy such a heinous sin that avoiding any small amount
of it is worth sacrificing the feelings
of people who had mistakenly assumed that they were pleasing others?
Apparently CNN didn't realize
people on both sides
of the fence can recognize
hypocrisy and publicity stunts when they see them.
So if I were a rich man and left all
of my possessions behind and lived on the street for a year as a homeless
person, is the
hypocrisy that I could go back to being rich or that I tried to see how someone else lives?
This year's Oscars presented a picture
of entitled rich
people who resent that they no longer have the influence they think they deserve and are irritated at having been called on their
hypocrisies.
And when we are at a loss against the
hypocrisy and the casual violence
of certain individuals and institutions, we will, as per Chief Jim Hopper, punch some
people in the face when they seek to destroy the weak and the disenfranchised and the marginalized.
And there has been no lack
of controversy over guilt, collaboration,
hypocrisy, and the public and private roles
people played during the years
of communism.
Fortunately, it seems that more and more
people are waking up in the 21st century and seeing through the
hypocrisy of spiritual entrepreneurs like Ralph Reed, good friend
of Jack Abramoff.
As Filip Mazurczak explained in a First Things article in 2013, «Romero avoided the blinkered anti-communism
of Argentina's bishops and defended the vulnerable against military violence, seeing the
hypocrisy of rulers who claim to be Christians yet persecute the
people.
But then I do nt think science means anything to any
of the
people discussing this even though they are using science to discuss in the form
of television, computers and internet what irony or is it
hypocrisy?
I also was aware
of the
hypocrisy of how «gay» sin, or «non-virgin» sin, or other «moral» issues, were regarded far far differently than sins
of omission, white lies, tax fudging, white collar crime in general (who is more sinful, the girl that has sex before marriage, or the CEO that knows his company is lax on pollution standards that affect the health
of hundreds / thousands
of people and animals that live nearby)
The thing I notice most, is that since there are very sincere
people within the church, that I often can tell apart the «church talk»
of theirs, from the «churchy» talk
of the
person being insincere, or so damaged that they are hidden behind masks or
hypocrisy, or walls.
People need to weigh their passionate feelings with careful thought before they chip away at the inviolability of individual conscience, and those who believe it can be legislated against should beware of hypocrisy; they are often the same people who argue that when it comes to abortion, a woman's own mind — her individual conscience and reason — outweighs what used to be called «conventional morality.&
People need to weigh their passionate feelings with careful thought before they chip away at the inviolability
of individual conscience, and those who believe it can be legislated against should beware
of hypocrisy; they are often the same
people who argue that when it comes to abortion, a woman's own mind — her individual conscience and reason — outweighs what used to be called «conventional morality.&
people who argue that when it comes to abortion, a woman's own mind — her individual conscience and reason — outweighs what used to be called «conventional morality.»
ops sorry i meant Amniculi... blah blah blah about Poe's Law,, its
hypocrisy!!!!!! talk trash about Christianity should be able to do the same about Islam, not encourging it just saying do nt be scare!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! do it will its not a felony yet, cause soon you wont be able too... Let me be clear, I meant express your opinions, comments about any religion as you do about Christianity, plus Im not religious, i just believe in jesus christ son
of god and the word
of the bible which is difference religion is made by
people...
In the same way, a
person who struggles to stop lying should be able to admit that he lies (admission
of hypocrisy) and instruct others that they ought to tell the truth.
The bible is full
of hypocrisy and the
people in today's society I think have actually shed most
of their belief but it's the eternity in hell that still gets
people.
For many
people it can come from reading the Bible and finding that it contains some good morals, but also errors, contradictions,
hypocrisy, nonsense and IMMORALITY by the standards
of many
people who follow the Golden Rule today.
These intolerant
people who whine about being marginalized while marginalizing others are the very definition
of hypocrisy.
The fundamental (excuse the pun) problems with far - right Christianity are exactly the same issues our Savior spoke about to the Pharisees: judgmentalism,
hypocrisy, intolerance, and the hyper - extremity
of observing the letter
of the law rather than its spirit (as evidenced by statements from various preachers that
people such gays and disobedient children should be killed).
So, even though the Quran tells
people to «follow the religion
of Abraham,» in
hypocrisy it denies the religion
of Abraham.
BTW
People keep saying the quotes are out
of context because sadly enough it is the fall back position
of most Christians when confronted not only by the ugliness in the Bible, but also the
hypocrisy of those who claim to follow it.
Typical CNN feedback that a story about a man sentenced to die for being a Christian and refusing to convert to Islam would bring out all the Christian - haters instead
of the death penalty haters or
people pointing out the
hypocrisy of Islam.
These methods may very well be common outside
of the Christian social media sphere, but the fact that they're common in it — among
people who should claim to care about integrity — does smack
of hypocrisy.
For some
people, supporting an embodiment
of cynicism, narcissism, and
hypocrisy is their retort to everyone else in politics.
Grew up and confirmed Methodist, and the amount
of hypocrisy I witnessed as a young
person changed my view
of religion.
I see
hypocrisy and vitriol from both Christians, Agnostics, and Atheists so it just proves that
people are still
people, being gay or fat or devoutly Christian or not has nothing to do what kind
of person you are and my wife and I have gay and straight friends, agnostic friends, evangelical friends, we don't discriminate, which is what Jesus Christ would have done in the first place.
@clinton — I was observing the
hypocrisy of telling an atheist not to push their views on
people when the church (and I'm not calling you out specifically)-- in general, pushes their beliefs on lots
of people.
It may be true that you have to stand for something or you will fall for anything, so I can't stand by and watch the
hypocrisy, not
of religion, but
of the
people who are religious.
One showed humility, the other arrogance; one practiced sincerity, the other
hypocrisy; one made efforts at cultivating unity, the other seemed to delight at encouraging division: and one succeeded in becoming more and more a man
of the
people, while the other, despite his harsh populist appeals, has grown more distant.