Sentences with phrase «hypostatic union»

Hence, White insists upon the doctrine of the «hypostatic union» as guarantor of the Tradition's confession of Christ's uniqueness — as well as upon the legitimacy, indeed the necessity, of reason's probing of the essential traits of human nature, notwithstanding the deformation wrought by the Fall.

Among the topics White treats are: «The Ontology of the Hypostatic Union,» «The Necessity of the Beatific Vision in the Earthly Christ,» «The Death of Christ and the Mystery of the Cross,» and «Did Christ Descend into Hell?

The «hypostatic union» of classical Christology finds clear warrant in the Christological hymns of the New Testament.

The hypostatic union of Scripture?!

If this was true of Jesus, it can also be true of Scripture, so that we can talk about the «hypostatic union» of Scripture.

This is called the «hypostatic union.»

(Mark 4:35 - 41) Certainly Mark believes that the single individual Jesus is both human and divine but this does not mean that Mark has arrived at a definition of the hypostatic union in the way the Council Fathers at Chalcedon in 451 did.

Terms such as «holy», «hallelujah» and «hypostatic union» may be bandied about inside the Church.

Jesus, being the example of this, was God's ontological pouring out into the flesh, thereby enacting the hypostatic union between the two natures of the one person Jesus.

However, the book rapidly enters into the early Christological disputes, and for those readers new to the difficulties surrounding significant theological and philosophical terms, such as «person», «nature», «hypostasis», «hypostatic union», and later the «original Nicene Creed» (a nod to the filioque controversy), the content may seem intimidating.

Christians believe in the hypostatic union.

[8] This is not to imply that Chalcedon was innovating in understanding Christ as having divine and human natures united by a divine person («hypostatic union»).

The lessons, for example, in the Annunciation section dive straight into a treatment of the hypostatic union and Mary as Theotokos, touch upon bioethics, and address joy, obedience and monasticism (as «Annunciation existence», p31).

Through the hypostatic union of God the Word with the human nature, men are given the highest possible destiny - beatific transformation as co-sharers of the infinite Godhead.

Come one, society, surely you're familiar with the hypostatic union — if you're going to be a unitarian, at least know what you're rejecting.

«God» — divinity and divine and glorious — however, did not, and it was precisely by virtue of His hypostatic union (humanity AND divinity united together) that Christ was able to conquer.

Via the hypostatic union, we are wrapped around with something we can not get rid of, something that therefore inevitably makes itself felt in all that we go on to become.»

We can not, at this point, make any meaningful analogies either to the union of the three persons in God (the doctrine of the Trinity) or to the two natures in Christ (the hypostatic union).

«Hypostatic union» is the fancy name for Christ's dual nature of being fully God and fully man.

The terms «trinity» and «hypostatic union» can not be found at all in scripture but that doesn't make them untrue.

It is the very reality of the hypostatic union which assures us that we worship the whole Christ, divinity and humanity.

If I needed to understand and teach Christological controversies over Christ's two natures in the hypostatic union, I was going to need to understand metaphysically bold propositions about «hypostases.»