Or maybe
my hypothesis about the forced selling is just bunk.
Not exact matches
I think it does — mainly because it
forces one to think
about the other ancillary
hypotheses are.
Nobody using this argument seems to be able to provide an alternative
hypothesis about what is
forcing the climate.
It seems that mankind has always been occupied with the problem of how to deal with ignorance.Primitive man, aware of his helplessness against the
forces of Nature but totally ignorant of their causes, would try to compensate for his ignorance by inventing
hypotheses about them.
In science, we are
forced by the requirement for the falsifiability of our
hypotheses to limit these
hypotheses to making claims
about quantities that are observable.
Gates - If the UN had held out a carrot of $ 1 Billion 20 years ago to the research establishment to prove the
hypothesis that the sun was the driver of climate, do you really think that we would be arguing
about the
forcing from CO2?
Coby: «Milankovic cycles» Actually, the article in question does address the issues you mentioned, but in a very broad way: «The other line of evidence concerns the very clear energy excess at and
about one cycle = 100 ka; where the orbital
forcing is extremely small, but where various
hypotheses have been proposed whereby non-linear interactions in the climate system can rectify the higher frequency
forcing into a very large lower frequency response.»