Sentences with phrase «hypothesis about the global temperature»

If the MWP did exist then what would be falsified is not just an hypothesis about global temperature but the entire meme of the special intuition of the consensus in climate science.

Not exact matches

Now that it is possible to simulate the Madden Julian Oscillation (MJO) signal explicitly in global atmospheric models, hypotheses about what controls observed relationships between sea surface temperatures (SSTs) and the MJO can be explored.

Suggesting that the deep ocean has sequestered the heat and will eventually release it again sounds to me a lot like the competing hypothesis that the oceans play the dominant role in regulating our climate and global temperature, something Bob Tisdale has been banging on about for a long while, and seems to be gaining more and more traction.

If someone of the ones who state the assertion about the «stopped» global warming, is able to demonstrate that the Null hypothesis above can be successfully rejected, using proper statistical analysis, I will concede that they indeed have statistical evidence at hand, which indicates something has changed significantly in the global temperature record since 1997 or whatever point is claimed to be the one at which global warming allegedly «stopped».

You write: «And, speaking of short periods of time on which to be drawing conclusions: the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis, correlating carbon dioxide increases with temperature increases, is based on only about 23 years — 1975 - 1998.

And, speaking of short periods of time on which to be drawing conclusions: the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis, correlating carbon dioxide increases with temperature increases, is based on only about 23 years — 1975 - 1998.

(Revised September 23, 2016 by addition of a new final section by Dr. James Wallace) As discussed in my book, Environmentalism Gone Mad, two of the reasonable inferences from the Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming (CAGW) hypothesis (the scientific basis for the world climate scare pushed by the United Nations and the Obama Administration) are that atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) levels should affect global temperatures, and that the resulting heat generated should be observable by a hot spot about 10 km over the trGlobal Warming (CAGW) hypothesis (the scientific basis for the world climate scare pushed by the United Nations and the Obama Administration) are that atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) levels should affect global temperatures, and that the resulting heat generated should be observable by a hot spot about 10 km over the trglobal temperatures, and that the resulting heat generated should be observable by a hot spot about 10 km over the tropics.

If one's hypothesis is correct about man - made global warming, then X amount of CO2 over time period Y should result in temperature Z.

This runaway effect that manmade climate change believers talk about comes from the hypothesis that climate change feedback mechanisms are positive and the small warming we have experienced will lead to drastic increases in global temperature.

You write: «And, speaking of short periods of time on which to be drawing conclusions: the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis, correlating carbon dioxide increases with temperature increases, is based on only about 23 years -1975-1998.

By not rejecting the null hypothesis this does not say anything about the validity of the null — the null being that there is no trend in global temperatures since 1995.