Does this mean that
the hypothesis of nuclear winter does not survive testing by modern climate models?
Not exact matches
Postscript, April 6, 12:14 p.m. Alan Robock, a Rutgers University climate scientist who has been studying the
nuclear winter hypothesis since the beginning, is concerned that The Times has given too much weight to the early notion
of a less severe «
nuclear autumn.»
In the video segment, I note how the evolution and erosion
of the
nuclear winter hypothesis (which two climate scientists, Stephen H. Schneider and Starley Thompson, later concluded would be more like a «
nuclear autumn» *) fit a cycle often seen in consequential science:
Three that I worked on extensively were the crash
of TWA Flight 800, the Y2K Millennium Bug and
of course the
hypothesis that
nuclear war would be followed by a devastating
nuclear winter.