Sentences with phrase «hypothesis when»

This is more than just a hypothesis when you consider the findings of the Thomson Reuters 2017 State of U.S. Small Law Firms Report which reveals that while:

This is more than just a hypothesis when you consider the findings of the

Those with a good grasp of statistics will know that is becase the test has very little statistical power (the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it actually is false).

Scenario (ii) can be ruled out if the statistical power of the test (the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is false) is high (e.g. 95 %).

(hint statistical power is the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it actually is false).

A real scientist abandons the hypothesis when the results don't measure up [this is called the «scientific method»].

This whole «Greenhouse Effect» conjecture (It ceased being a hypothesis when it caused everything and everything was proof of it) is the saddest example of «post modern» science ever seen, what a complete and total HOAX, it makes the Piltdown Man look respectable and peer reviewed......

What is the point of providing a quote pertaining to an untested hypothesis when what is clearly being asked for is the replicable experiments which demonstrate that «Anthropogenic Global Warming» is indeed a theory (and not a falsified hypothesis)?

How can this even be a rational hypothesis when the water cycle cools the Earth by 52 °C?

This tendency, if it exists, may be the seed for the extinction of our species, but if it is, no one will be around to accept or reject my hypothesis when the data become available.

While one could argue that each artist in About Face channels Kermode's hypothesis when developing artwork, it's also apparent that the figure is the primary vehicle by which this message is conveyed.

It's a credit to Frazier's screenplay that we're only really pondering the problems with the hypothesis when the movie is directly talking about it, and it's an even greater credit to the script that such instances are rare.

However, a study published in 2013 in the Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry cast doubt on part of Davis» hypothesis when it reported that there's not really any more gluten in modern wheat than there was in 1920s - era wheat.

In this Radio Ecoshock interview she says: «I learned about this hypothesis when I attended a paleontology conference at the Mammoth Site in Hot Springs North Dakota.»

We always stress the importance of having a strong driving hypothesis when creating a betting system and the logic here makes all the sense in the world.

Solidarity activists derided the Bernstein hypothesis when it was first bruited in 1992, and there is nothing in His Holiness to suggest that their judgment was mistaken.

You seem to accept your own god hypothesis when there is just as much showing your hypothesis is correct than that one.

Children included in this study were randomly selected, and the mothers were not aware of the breast feeding hypotheses when they agreed to participate.

«I particularly object to the testing of sharp null hypotheses when there is no plausible basis for believing the null is true.

So, for example, you don't purposefully confuse matters with the possibility of there being 1,000 s of possible null hypotheses when there is one simple null hypothesis that is sufficient to challenge the credibility of a theory.

You can not make much progress with highly finessed hypotheses when you do not have adequate quality in your observations.

Not exact matches

When you discover your error, rather than firing executives and / or creating a crisis, you simply change the hypotheses.

Consistent with his self - selection hypothesis, female analysts tend to cover larger stocks with high institutional ownership even when they are less experienced.

David Reifschneider's hypothesis that supply may well be endogenous is even more plausible when a combination of labour market deregulation and technological innovation is occurring.

Even when we pass on a deal, we respond quickly and provide transparent reasons for our decision, often accompanied by a humble acknowledgement that we could be wrong and what evidence could disprove our hypothesis.

However, companies fail with such opportunities when they blindly pursue the hype of these technologies, never truly vetting the hypothesis they are trying to test.

When I should know that something is wrong in my hypotheses?

For example, they believe in the efficient market hypothesis, and therefore believe that the volatility of stock prices is equivalent to real risk, and they place a strong emphasis on volatility when they judge your performance.»

Grounded Theory Interviews: this can be used when there is a need to test and validate hypotheses on specific «grounded» observations or data.

The hypothesis is that this dynamic lookback interval approach avoids undesirable whipsaws when asset returns are volatile.

When multiple experiments (especially those that examine different aspects of the hypothesis) support it, it graduates into the realm of scientific theory.

When it is based upon pure hypothesis, it is ALWAYS a logic fallacy.

When the results support the hypothesis, it must be reproducible in different labs by different people at different times.

Laycock's hypothesis ripened into full - blown suspicion by June 2000 when Justice Stevens took the position that the free speech rights of the Boy Scouts were not violated by a state law requiring them to employ an avowed homosexual as an assistant scoutmaster.

The argument which they rest on as triumphant and unanswerable is that, in every hypothesis of Cosmogony you must admit an eternal pre-existence of something; and according to the rule of sound philosophy, you are never to employ two principles to solve a difficulty when one will suffice.

Coppedge had no business bringing his religious views into the workplace when the purpose of that workplace is to analyze data and test hypotheses using the scientific method.

These women were in effect the Newtonian apple that led to Freud's later hypotheses; for when he realized that his neurological examinations were getting nowhere, that, physiologically speaking, his patients were no different from non - hysterics, he was forced to posit a special set of life experiences that the healthy brains of those hysterical women had registered, but suppressed.

I think perhaps that everyone is getting caught up in «proving a negative» when in fact the focus should be on the fact that «there is a god» is an un-falsifiable hypothesis, and thus meaningless.

As opposed to evolution that gives guesses and hypothesis, the 1st chapter of Genesis lays out how the earth was prepared for human habitation, in a logical, coherent and chronological way, just as when a builder lays the foundation for a home and proceeds to build it in an orderly fashion.

On face value, W. E. Hocking's remark that when Whitehead arrived at Harvard «his speculative structure... was already well advanced in its main outlines» is a bit of external evidence against my hypothesis, but it may mean nothing more than that Whitehead was little influenced by the philosophical opinions and controversies of his American colleagues during these years, which seems very much to have been the case.

You have already concluded a «designer» when there is NOTHING to back up the hypothesis.

The fact that Matthew and Luke use these sayings in other connections, and then repeat them when following Mark, together with the fact of the sometimes divergent form of the sayings in Mark, seems best to be explained by the hypothesis that Mark also is drawing from the common stock — either the collection Q or its equivalent in some common cycle of «sayings of the Lord.»

Also, when approaching physics, it is difficult for those people with experience to «mandate» (or synthesize) a hypothesis without a theory and some sort of proof.

You're using a non-scientific definition of theory (here's a hint, what you really mean when you say that is, «hypothesis») and it's inconsistent.

We could then suppose that when Whitehead developed the idea of the consequent nature in the narrow sense, he created the «primordial nature» as a contrasting term This hypothesis would make sense of the present text of PR without supposing that Whitehead began working on the Gifford Lectures only with a noninteractive God little different from the abstract principle of concretion of SMW» (PS 15: 200).

If you throw out scientific hypotheses, you must then deny simple, everyday life experiences like knowing that when you flip a switch a light goes on or off or when you heat water, it will boil over.

This is because you can never test every possible universal permutation of the theory / hypothesis, and because none of us were there 8 billion years ago when the Earth was first formed.

Science is about questioning, about developing hypotheses that turn into theories when the evidence stacks up, and then are acknowledged as fact.

When he, you, or anyone else can explain the precambrian explosion and how it counters Darwins wondrous hypothesis, I will lend you an ear.

Theories start as hypotheses, they become theories when they are supported over and over by all the evidence at hand.