In R. v. Nur the result flowed from analysis of a reasonable
hypothetical fact pattern, such as the otherwise law - abiding gun owner who would be equally caught by the law.
Together, the results of these studies suggest that practice with feedback improves final performance.156 None of these articles, however, suggest that students received any instruction on how to effectively apply legal rules to
the hypothetical fact patterns.
Not exact matches
The particular
facts function no longer as «factors,» but become «bare its,» that is, function as logical subjects with a
hypothetical relevance to a predicative
pattern now potentially determinate of these logical subjects.