You could also get
hypothetical questions which do have right answers, in order to test your understanding of the job.
For all these reasons, in answer to
the hypothetical question which opened this article, Hanna would be out of luck.
Not exact matches
For a less -
hypothetical example, see this story (in
which I'm quoted) by Nicole Neroulias in the Albany Times Union: «Corporate giving is
questioned».
At least that's the thinking at Microsoft, where hundreds of job seekers have been asked the bathroom
question as part of the legendary «interview loop» — a rigorous ritual in
which candidates are grilled by their future colleagues with a barrage of puzzles, riddles, and bizarre
hypothetical questions.
So the answer to the
question I posed above is that, provided the variability of interest rates has also fallen in proportion to the fall in the average interest rate level —
which it has — the
hypothetical household in 2003 is in no riskier a position than the
hypothetical household in 1993.
A belief can come in as an invited guest, tentative and
hypothetical, and end up taking over, dictating
which values, open
questions and behavioral options get to linger and
which must go.
Thus while we can identify a concept of the church against
which a dominant strand in recent theology has reacted, we can make only a
hypothetical construction of what might have resulted had historical
questions of institutional continuity been pursued.
The solution most widely agreed upon to the
question of who is borrowing from whom is still the Two - Source Hypothesis, according to
which Mark is understood to be the first Gospel written, and Mark and the
hypothetical source Q are proposed as the primary written sources used by Matthew and Luke.
Regardless of the status of the Golan Heights, the
question as I understand it, is about a
hypothetical scenario in
which the attacked territory is under belligerent occupation.
Can you give an example of a
hypothetical citable fact
which can be a possible answer to this
question?
But as the former congressman still has a full campaign war chest and strong name recognition — and the fact that electoral politics is a zero - sum game — the
question rises:
which of his
hypothetical rivals would be most impacted by his decision?
«I was told it was always a bad idea to answer
hypothetical questions...» A chuckle from the audience opened the door for a more direct continuation in
which Gove assured the crowd of his faith that the Conservative Party would win an outright majority at the next election, hence he was «absolutely confident that the situation need not arise.»
But federal prosecutors, in a filing responding to the motion, argued the use of
hypothetical questions was legally proper in examining the «quality and integrity» of Oyster Bay's management,
which they said was key to the charges against Venditto.
Cordain then asks the
hypothetical question: «Would it be surprising that the typical western diet
which includes 10 to 12 grams of sodium per day might have adverse effects upon the immune system and diseases of chronic inflammation?»
It went like this: said friend's daughter had been on a quest to lose weight and as such followed a distinctly regimented eating routine for the whole of six months before beginning to experience severe stomach aches that manifested first as period cramps, then gas, then a big
question mark that could have, with the right dose of neuroses, led to a number of
hypothetical ailments, some of
which — terminal.
Suddenly, this lightweight comedy is tackling a tantalizing — if completely
hypothetical —
question:
which is more important, a work of art or a human life?
Screenwriter and first - time director Menno Meyjes» Max is an intelligent and utterly compelling
hypothetical question in
which scholarly musings and dramatic irony come together to create a powerful, thought - provoking experience.
There is no set number of years automatically «falsifying the theory» — after all, the laundry list of radiative forcings has about a dozen terms, so the
hypothetical lack of warming you propose would raise the
question of just
which factors were involved.
Hypothetical question to the New York Times and the UEA: if US Congressional (or UK Parliamentary) staffers and researchers decided that their work product upon
which legislation is or will be based was not to be made available to investigators and / or opposition politicians, what would be the NYT and the UEA position on that refusal to openly provide information / data / research that was publicly funded?
To answer this
question, the scientists examined a
hypothetical scenario in
which the Big Five extinctions occurred suddenly, such that all of the species went extinct over just 500 years rather than over hundreds of thousands to millions of years.
The fact that glyphosate, by its very function, is intended to be released into the environment was significant: «In that case, foreseeable emissions, under normal or realistic conditions of use, from the product in
question, or from the substances
which that product contains, into the environment are not
hypothetical and are covered by the concept of «emissions into the environment»» (paragraph 75).
This
question includes multiple
hypotheticals that may have seemed inconceivable a year or two ago, but now that we've shifted to debating about how they might be implemented, consider the following campaign promises of the current US President,
which can not be trivially dismissed:
If one approaches the
question by reference to what the parties would have agreed, one is not strictly concerned with the
hypothetical answer of the actual parties, but with that of notional reasonable people in the position of the parties at the time at
which they were contracting.
Any time a
question «paints a picture» or establishes something
hypothetical and simply asks the witness to agree with the fantasy scenario, the witness can refuse to answer, or can answer with a counter scenario
which they consider to be more accurate.
While the Respondent argued that the decision to proceed by special case was a discretionary one to
which deference was owed, the Appellants argued that the special case was not appropriate because: the
questions posed in the special case rested on a
hypothetical assumption that the agreements were valid; necessary facts were not included and not all the facts were agreed upon by the parties; and the parties did not sign the statement of special case as required by Rule 9 - 3 (3)(c).
«Obviously» is more a judgment call, but comes down to the
question of whether there is a path between the datum and the specific person
which a person of average intelligence can see, versus (non-obviously) a
hypothetical scenario whereby one might be able to connect a datum to a specific person.
«Ripeness» is a judicially - created doctrine
which prevents courts from ruling on
hypothetical or abstract
questions; instead, this doctrine requires that courts only decide matters
which are in actual controversy.