Sentences with phrase «i.e. at a low risk»

Not exact matches

Looking at a simple asset allocation, a theoretical allocation to long - dated U.S. bonds (+20 years) fluctuates from as low as 3 % to as high as 25 % based on changes to the risk model, i.e. correlation of different asset classes.

Once again, the official arbiters of taste and decorum have lowered their standards sufficiently to allow an errant Texan to slip past the velvet ropes and sneak in to blast a crowd both innocent and unprepared with that special e.politics magic... i.e., a couple of conferences are coming up, so I get to babble at length and in public without the risk of being gagged or (openly) shunned.

Marketable limit orders (i.e., buy limit orders priced higher than the prevailing offer price or sell limit orders priced lower than the prevailing bid price) will trade much like market orders, increasing the certainty of execution without the risk of the order trading at a price outside of an investor's acceptable range.

«The results indicate that given the same credit risk (i.e., for borrowers with the same expected delinquency rate), consumers would be able to obtain credit at a lower rate through the LendingClub than through traditional credit card loans offered by banks.»

My conclusion was that TFG trades at a discount because of it's egregious fee structure a — i.e. if you have the same underlying risk on two bonds and someone «steals» 20 % of your coupon then that bond should naturally trade at a discount... I chose to invest in CIFU as it consistently pays out 50 % of all free cash as dividend and reinvests the other 50 % in similar asset and its running at much lower cost base and REALLY is a pure play (i.e. no Asset Management assets)-- adding to that ISA eligible and CIFU stands out from my perspective.

This is fine for estimates at annual and decadal time scales, but as you approach the timespan covered by each core, you run a serious risk of starting to remove part of the climatic variation, thereby under - estimating the total amount that occurred, with the loss being greatest at the longest time scales (i.e. lowest frequency variation).

In addition to the general constraints of conducting research in an applied setting, program evaluations pose special obstacles for researchers because of the clinical and ethical issues involved in withholding treatment or wait - listing participants who clearly might benefit from the program (i.e., at - risk students, low - income families).

For example, studies have shown that authoritarian parenting (i.e., high parental control, low warmth), which may be detrimental in typically developing youth, 14,15 can be protective for children who are at - risk due to their environmental and / or behavioural profiles.16, 17 Similarly, although parentification was once conceived of as an inherently detrimental phenomenon, 18 children's provision of care to parents and kin may be associated with heightened self - esteem and achievement among some groups and depends strongly on the culture and value judgments of individuals within the family.19

Other risk factors (i.e., teen or single parenthood, very low income, high initial levels of problem behavior) showed no predictive effects, implying intervention was at least as successful at helping the most disadvantaged families, compared to more advantaged.

Moreover, multinomial logistic regressions revealed a profile of children at risk of developing high anxiety symptoms (i.e., high group), characterized by sociofamily adversity, inattention, and low prosociality in the classroom.