Also you clearly didn't read this because the «Christians» they are talking about are completely different and separate from the social conservatives; they are «progressive» Christians,
i.e. liberal left wingers.
Not exact matches
Sane people can disagree about whether there ought to be a right to privacy,
i.e., about whether it is logically a natural right and if so perhaps ought to be put into the Constitution via amendment, or about whether we (usually at state - level) should pass particular laws, such as ones that legalize gay - marriage, that factually expand what might be called privacy, but no sane U.S. Citizen, gay, straight,
liberal, or conservative, should be
left ignorant about the Constitution - wounding judicial usurpations done in the name of this right, more of which are planned to be done soon enough.
At the 2010 election
Liberal Democrat MPs, members and voters were all more social liberal than economic liberal (using both terms in their traditional British not American sense) i.e. left rather than right of
Liberal Democrat MPs, members and voters were all more social
liberal than economic liberal (using both terms in their traditional British not American sense) i.e. left rather than right of
liberal than economic
liberal (using both terms in their traditional British not American sense) i.e. left rather than right of
liberal (using both terms in their traditional British not American sense)
i.e. left rather than right of centre.
There are basically two mainstream positions in UK politics at the moment: the
liberal right (
i.e. the coalition government), or the authoritarian
left (
i.e. the Labour opposition).
They believe OTM is actually on their (
i.e. left wing /
liberal) side and thus abandoned the cause by allying with the Republicans or corporate bought Democrats.