Not exact matches
I've had my thyroid and liver checked before, which seems to be the common suggestion to check, but they have only been
tested by conventional endochrinologist biomarkers (
i.e. FT4, TSH, and thyroid antibodies and I can't remember what for the liver), perhaps the thyroid / liver checks could still be false
negatives.
(2) As an employer, you must not use a cancelled
test for the purposes of a
negative test to authorize the employee to perform safety - sensitive functions (
i.e., in the case of a pre-employment, return - to - duty, or follow - up
test).
(C) You maintain no individually identifiable record that the employee had a confirmed laboratory positive, adulterated, or substituted
test result (
i.e., you maintain a record of the
test only as a
negative or cancelled
test).
(2) As an employer, you must not use a cancelled
test for the purposes of a
negative test to authorize the employee to perform safety - sensitive functions (
i.e.
Because this is a cancelled
test, it does not serve the purposes of a
negative test (
i.e., the employer is not authorized to allow the employee to begin or resume performing safety - sensitive functions, because a
negative test is needed for that purpose).
(4) If a
negative result is required (
i.e., pre-employment, return - to - duty, or follow - up
tests), follow the procedures at § 40.160 for determining if there is clinical evidence that the individual is an illicit drug user.
All of the smart beta correlations have the «right» (
i.e.,
negative) sign, suggesting that lower valuation is good for future returns; 65 of 96 are significant at a 5 % level, with almost half (45 of the
tests) significant at the 1 % level.
However, it is not a very sensitive means of heartworm detection in the cat (
i.e., there is a high chance of false
negative test results).
Researchers found a lower chance of erroneously declaring a cat positive (
i.e., higher
test specificity) if only one
test was used, but there was a lower chance of erroneously declaring a cat
negative (
i.e., higher sensitivity) when the two
test results were combined.12
To improve our understanding of the development of depressive symptoms, future research could
test hypotheses in which factors from different levels interact,
i.e., cognitions, genetics, environment, affect,
negative life experiences, as suggested by the cognitive vulnerability - transactional stress model (Hankin and Abramson 2001).
We also confirmed that the samples were not significantly different from one another in terms of alcohol consumption (average drinks per week and drinking status),
negative marital quality, or covariates (
i.e., age, education, years married, race, number of children, marital order, and alcohol problems) with a series of chi - square and t
tests.