Sentences with phrase «i.e. see their research»

As it so happens, most of the BEST graphs include 12 - month running means (i.e. see their research papers).

Not exact matches

According to market research firm Symphony IRI, the energy drink market saw an 18.7 percent increase in 2012, and part of that recent growth comes from new, natural energy drinks (i.e. ones with ingredients you can actually pronounce).

As her report put it: «The research suggests that, while there may be little return to trying to make students more gritty as a way of being (i.e., in ways that would carry over to all aspects of their lives at all times and across contexts), students can be influenced to demonstrate perseverant behaviors — such as persisting at academic tasks, seeing big projects through to completion, and buckling down when schoolwork gets hard — in response to certain classroom contexts and under particular psychological conditions.»

Furthermore, it helps a great deal to have a long - term appointment and a reasonable workload (i.e., not too much teaching), because that provides evidence of institutional commitment: NIH doesn't want to see you lose your job or move on to another institution, leaving an NIH - funded research project unfinished.

At the same time, we wish to help students (1) experience authentic processes of science, in particular discussion / debate about experimental data and their interpretation (including «grey areas»), (2) recognize the creativity and open - ended nature of research, and (3) see the diversity of people who undertake research careers (i.e. not just the genius / geeks of popular culture).

Finally, although acutely we see a rise in blood pressure (i.e. don't drink coffee right before going to the doctor's office), research does not support the claim that coffee will cause long term hypertension.

Reading up on research conducted by renowned academics, I've yet to see any scientific paper (published by an online dating site that claims scientific matching or any related academic) showing how its «recipe» really works, i.e. proving they can offer enduring, long term relationships (or marriage) with low divorce rates.

It should be noted, though, that we as a nation have been relying upon similar high - stakes educational policies since the late 1970s (i.e., for now over 35 years); however, we have literally no research evidence that these high - stakes accountability policies have yielded any of their intended effects, as still perpetually conceptualized (see, for example, Nevada's recent legislative ruling here) and as still advanced via large - and small - scale educational policies (e.g., we are still A Nation At Risk in terms of our global competitiveness).

To see two empirical articles about the claims made to sell Sanders's EVAAS system, the research non-existent in support of each of the claims, and the realities of those at the receiving ends of this system (i.e., teachers) as per their experiences with each of the claims, see here and here.

That is, bias (a highly controversial issue covered in the research literature and also on this blog; see recent posts about bias here, here, and here), does also appear to exist in this state and particularly at the school - level for (1) subject areas less traditionally tested and, hence, not often consecutively tested (e.g., from one consecutive grade level to the next), and given (2) the state is combining growth measures with proficiency (i.e., «snapshot») measures to evaluate schools, the latter being significantly negatively correlated with the populations of the students in the schools being evaluated.

And presumably the reason that the data is inadequate is that the rest of society (i.e. people other than wildlife biologists) just doesn't see feral cats as a question of burning importance, and therefore feral cats are not attracting a lot of research dollars.

For a survey of scientific opinions, rather than the published work, see Doran 2009, whose survey found that among scientists who had more than half of their recent work on climate (i.e., who are actively researching the matter), 97 % agreed that:

Now despite his prior criticisms of the climate science community (i.e. see our previous Muller posts), Muller and BEST have independently confirmed the accuracy of some of the main components of the body of climate science research.

Alarie: technology doesn't invent itself, time, money, risk to develop this; need incentives for investing in this; no agenda then to hold the mirror up to ourselves; best if academics involved, i.e. no commercial interests; see potential to nationalize this as a public good, natural monopoly emerging; like energy from nuclear power; government's not doing this research

You'll have noticed that on the revamped Google Advanced Search page there's a link that will expand into a drop - down menu, letting you select whether you want results from pages that have been indexed for the first time — i.e. pages newly discovered by Google, which will likely be brand new pages but needn't be, of course — in the last day, week, month etc. (See the Research Buzz post from a year ago for more on what the dating means.)

Past research has shown that being the advantaged partner in the relationship (i.e., making fewer contributions and / or receiving more benefits relative to the partner) is associated with more positive outcomes than being the disadvantaged partner (see Guerrero et al., 2008; Kamo, 1993).

Importantly, research has shown that children who scored high in behavioural intensity (i.e., show high activity and intense reactions to new situations and events) had a history of more medically - attended injuries when their parents reported reduced supervision but not when their parents reported closely supervising (see Figure 1).23 Thus, close supervision can counteract the elevated risk of injury typically found for temperamentally - difficult children.24, 25 On the other hand, the child attribute of inhibitory control (e.g., child can exercise self control and resist doing things prohibited by a caregiver) serves a protective function and predicts a history of fewer medically - attended injuries even under conditions of reduced supervision (see Figure 1).23 Hence, whether lower levels of supervision lead to increased risk of injury depends, in part, on the child's behavioural attributes.