Sea ice type and
ice age estimates will continue to be important as well as direct observations.
Sea -
ice age estimates in spring, showing conditions during the last week of April in 2009 (upper image) and 2010 (lower image).
Not exact matches
we can
estimate the
age of these drawings by the people that once lived there during the last
ice age which was 30,000 years ago.
Our study is significant because, while there are various different
estimates for the start and end of the Little
Ice Age in different regions of the world, our data show that the most extreme phases occurred at the same time in both the Northern and Southern Hemispheres.
Balco never reached Larsen B because of the ship's problems with sea
ice, but Eugene Domack, the marine geologist who led the 2010 expedition, has already
estimated the
age of the Larsen B
ice shelf.
When she
estimated the
ages of abyssal hills flanking the ridge, she found that they matched the strong 100,000 - year
ice age cycle.
Cuffey developed a technique to combine these temperature measurements, which are smoothed as a result of heat diffusion in the
ice, with isotopic measurements of old
ice to come up with an
estimated temperature of 11.3 degrees, plus or minus 1.8 degrees Celsius, warming since the depths of the
ice age.
This new
age volume provides the first data - driven
estimate of where Eemian
ice may remain.
Scientists
estimate the lake itself is roughly 14 million years old — the
age of the
ice sheet that covers it — and that the water currently in the lake is roughly 1 million years old.
A succession of
ice ages was triggered once the atmosphere's CO2 dropped below 600 ppm around 2.6 million years ago, just 200 ppm shy of the Earth's current
estimate.
Since the last
Ice Age, 11.500 years ago, it is
estimated that 255 mammals and 523 bird species has gone extinct, often due to human activity.
Mackay
estimated the
ice could have been as old as 800,000 years, making it roughly the same
age as the oldest
ice ever core - sampled from anywhere in the world.
Researchers have
estimated that during the last
Ice Age, parts of Siberia may have had an average population density of sixty animals per hundred square kilometres - equivalent to African elephants today.
But despite earlier pollen analysis that pegged the movement of some tree species (that is, average advancement via seed dispersal) at about a kilometer per year after the last
ice age, genetic studies have reduced that
estimate to a pace closer to a tenth of a kilometer per year, Loarie says.
Earlier genome - based
estimates have suggested that the ancestors of modern - day dogs diverged from wolves no more than 16,000 years ago, after the last
Ice Age.
While the overlap during deglaciations is large (which makes it near impossible to make any
estimates of relative forcings), during the start of the last
ice age, there was no overlap: CO2 started to decrease (some 40 - 50 ppmv) when the temperature was already near it's minimum.
Indeed, the main quandary faced by climate scientists is how to
estimate climate sensitivity from the Little
Ice Age or Medieval Warm Period, at all, given the relative small forcings over the past 1000 years, and the substantial uncertainties in both the forcings and the temperature changes.
Edinburgh, T. & Day, J. (2016)
Estimating the extent of Antarctic summer sea
ice during the Heroic
Age of Exploration, The Cryosphere, doi: 10.5194 / tc -10-2721-2016.
To put things in perspective, the global temperature shift between the last
Ice Age and now is believed to be 10 °F; and an
estimated 11 °F increase in world temperatures was sufficient to wipe out 95 % of species at the end of the Permian Period 250 million years ago.
Re «
Estimates of the drivers of global temperature change in the
ice ages show that the changes in greenhouse gases (CO2, methane and nitrous oxide) made up about a third of the effect, amplifying the
ice sheet changes by about 50 % (Köhler et al, 2010).»
Indeed, the bizarre resulting claim by MM of anomalous 15th century warmth (which falls within the heart of the «Little
Ice Age») is at odds with not only the MBH98 reconstruction, but, in fact the roughly dozen other
estimates now published that agree with MBH98 within
estimated uncertainties.
Climate
estimates compiled by geochemists from past periods with large changes (e.g.
ice ages) show that the climate is a highly non-linear system, with thresholds and sudden dramatic changes.
See e.g. this review paper (Schmidt et al, 2004), where the response of a climate model to
estimated past changes in natural forcing due to solar irradiance variations and explosive volcanic eruptions, is shown to match the spatial pattern of reconstructed temperature changes during the «Little
Ice Age» (which includes enhanced cooling in certain regions such as Europe).
During the Little
Ice Age, the fall in average global temperature is
estimated to have been less than 1 Â °C and lasted 70 years.
Indeed, the main quandary faced by climate scientists is how to
estimate climate sensitivity from the Little
Ice Age or Medieval Warm Period, at all, given the relative small forcings over the past 1000 years, and the substantial uncertainties in both the forcings and the temperature changes.
eg 6 Conclusions We have developed a new algorithm for
estimating sea
ice age distribution using sea
ice drift and concentration products.
While the overlap during deglaciations is large (which makes it near impossible to make any
estimates of relative forcings), during the start of the last
ice age, there was no overlap: CO2 started to decrease (some 40 - 50 ppmv) when the temperature was already near it's minimum.
Instead, to constrain the Charney sensitivity from the
ice age cycle you need to specifically extract out those long term changes (in
ice sheets, vegetation, sea level etc.) and then
estimate the total radiative forcing including these changes as forcing, not responses.
The sources of methane variations can be
estimated using the interpolar gradient (for the last climatic cycle, using Greenland - Antarctic
ice core differences after
age scale synchronization) and also using stable isotopes of carbon and hydrogen of methane.
If, for example, scientists had somehow underestimated the climate change between Medieval times and the Little
Ice Age, or other natural climate changes, without corresponding errors in the
estimated size of the causes of the changes, that would suggest stronger amplifying feedbacks and larger future warming from rising greenhouse gases than originally
estimated.
There are variuos ways to
estimate climate sensitivity, studies of volcanic eruptions,
ice ages, or measurements of Earth's energy budget.
Via various isotope analyses and flow models, Jasechko (2017)
estimated that between 42 - 85 % of all groundwater stored in the upper 1 kilometer of the earth's crust is water that had infiltrated the ground more than 11,000 years ago, during last
Ice Age.
If the researcher had provided reasonable error
estimates for all of the relationships modeled, I think the predictions would have come with very wide error bars, probably even permitting an
ice age in time, because so many of the relationships are poorly understood.
Some
estimate the atmospheric residence time of gaseous CO2 at four years, so the fuels combusted today presumably will not be available to assist photosynthesis during the next
ice age.
Correcting that
estimate for the millennium warming cycle, ie, the temperature recovery from the Little
Ice Age, and the urban heat island effect gives an ECS best
estimate of 1.0 °C.
Among the aspects of that variation that we can isolate are probably factors that have produced a general «global» warming trend since the deepest part of the «Little
Ice Age», long before any «mainstream»
estimate of anthropogenic changes to pCO2 would have been significant.
This was then followed by the little
ice age 1400 to 1700, which would indicate that we should expect to see a a decrease (or flattening of the curve) in CO2, starting in the interval 2000 - 2400 (depending on how accurate the 800 year
estimate is)..
Satellite - derived
estimates of sea -
ice age and thickness are combined to produce a proxy
ice thickness record for 1982 to the present.
Rigor et al. (Polar Science Center, University of Washington); 5.4 Million Square Kilometers; Heuristic This
estimate is based on the prior winter Arctic Oscillation (AO) conditions, and the spatial distribution of the sea
ice of different
ages as
estimated from a Drift -
age Model (DM), which combines buoy drift and retrievals of sea
ice drift from satellites (Rigor and Wallace, 2004, updated).
Estimated ice age for June 21, 2010 from the University of Colorado satellite - derived (Lagrangian drift) sea
ice age (in years).
Even though quantitative
estimates are refined every now and then due to progress in mass spectrometry and understanding the biology of these creatures, qualitative inference (trends, variability) of foraminiferal proxy records from as far backas the 50s still holds true (Milankovitch cycles,
ice ages etc..)
Add in the fact that the thickness of the
ice, which is much harder to measure, is
estimated to have fallen by half since 1979, when satellite records began, and there is probably less
ice floating on the Arctic Ocean now than at any time since a particularly warm period 8,000 years ago, soon after the last
ice age.
The globe has maintained a temperature of ± ~ 3 % (including
ice ages) for at least the last half a billion years during which we can
estimate the temperature.
The post was written by Gavin Schmidt and describes why the earth system sensitivity (ESS) can not be
estimated by regressing temperature and radiative forcing
estimates across
ice -
age cycles.
Here, thickness data, which are sorely lacking but available in a few locations as the result of International Polar Year efforts and from satellite - derived
estimates of
ice age or type, constrain modeled thickness distributions.
This
estimate is based on survival rates for
ice of different
age classes through the summer.
Method: Based on a buoy drift model that
estimates the
age of sea
ice, QuikSCAT retrievals of
ice age classes, and the survival rates of each
age class.
In recent years researchers have been lowering their
estimates of mass gained during the last
Ice Age and lost ice mass during the recent deglaciati
Ice Age and lost
ice mass during the recent deglaciati
ice mass during the recent deglaciation.
In short, the MARGO data for the ocean show very small temperature change from the
ice age to today, and thus lead to the low climate sensitivity, but they disagree with some independent
estimates showing larger temperature change.
The most important period for
estimating sensitivity of CO2 to temperature on century time - scales is the Little
Ice Age.