# 49 The contribution of these large glaciers seems just that in terms of
ice and water volume, but put in the context of sverdrups, is another question.
Not exact matches
This requires no such nerve - wracking processes; it is literally as easy as boiling
water for the first hour or so,
and then you'll keep an eye on it
and stir it regularly until it is just a slip of its original
volume, intense magnification of the original taste,
and oh so gooey on a crepe (filled with fresh banana
and mango, here), on
ice cream or on a spoon.
The fifth
and sixth planets, both in the habitable zone, are more than half
water — a
volume so large that the
water pressure alone could force much of it into a form of
ice, Unterborn says.
Since the density of pure
water ice is ca. 920 kg / m3,
and that of sea
water ca. 1025 kg / m3, typically, around 90 % of the
volume of an iceberg is under
water,
and that portion's shape can be difficult to surmise from looking at what is visible above the surface.
With a
volume of more than 700,000 cubic miles
and an average thickness of 4,000 feet, the West Antarctic
Ice Sheet (WAIS) holds enough water to raise sea levels by 15 to 20 feet — and it is already sweating off 130 billion tons of ice per ye
Ice Sheet (WAIS) holds enough
water to raise sea levels by 15 to 20 feet —
and it is already sweating off 130 billion tons of
ice per ye
ice per year.
This glacial meltwater lake was enclosed in
ice and experienced a massive breach during this period, which emptied an enormous
volume of
water into the ocean,» explains Herrle.
They are motivated by the humbling realization that our knowledge of undersea life as a whole is only slightly less sketchy than our knowledge of life under those Antarctic
ice shelves: Even where the
water is not covered by
ice, its sheer
volume — not to mention the difficulty of seeing
and moving through it — means that it is nearly all aqua incognita.
What is alarming is that the
volume of
water and the extent
and rapidity of its movement is suprisingly much greater than previously believed,
and that a possible, perhaps likely, effect of this on
ice sheet dynamics is to make the
ice sheets less stable
and more likely to respond more quickly to global warming than previously expected.
Sea level rise has two primary components: the expansion in
volume of seawater with increased temperature
and the addition of
water in ocean basins from the melting of land - locked
ice, including Antarctica
and Greenland.
Scientists have long suspected that the network of cracks in Europa's
ice sheet could indicate a large
volume of
water underneath,
and recent analysis of magnetic field data from the Galileo probe seems to confirm there is a salty ocean down there.
And it's also important to remember that, while sea ice is increasing in Antarctica, glaciers and ice shelves are all melting rapidly, producing large volumes of fresh wat
And it's also important to remember that, while sea
ice is increasing in Antarctica, glaciers
and ice shelves are all melting rapidly, producing large volumes of fresh wat
and ice shelves are all melting rapidly, producing large
volumes of fresh
water.
The typical estimate of the sea - level change is five metres, a value arrived at by taking the total
volume of the West Antarctic
Ice Sheet, converting it to
water and spreading it evenly across the oceans.
The changes in
volume over a season also tell us how much
ice is produced, how much heat is extracted from the ocean, how much brine is injected into the ocean as a result of
ice growth
and how much melt
water is injected back into the ocean.
Another possibility might be a slowing of deep circulation (not sure how much there is, mind), in which case the opposite occurs,
and the surface
waters heat up even faster, leading to yet more rapid surface melt, smaller winter
ice volumes and so on.
Such floods are only constrained by the
volumes of
water and ice in the system.
This would seem to suggest that if the
volume of
ice melt is as great as suspected, that there had to be a greater salinity in the region that was mixing with the melt
water to reduce the expanse
and depth of the brackish region.
The main issue is that sea
ice is fresher than sea
water (has less salt),
and since salty
water is more dense (1028 kg / m3) than fresher
water (1004 kg / m3 for 5 psu), the
volume of sea
water displaced by the
ice is slightly less than the
volume of the
ice if it melted.
On decadal
and longer time scales, global mean sea level change results from two major processes, mostly related to recent climate change, that alter the
volume of
water in the global ocean: i) thermal expansion (Section 5.5.3),
and ii) the exchange of
water between oceans
and other reservoirs (glaciers
and ice caps,
ice sheets, other land
water reservoirs - including through anthropogenic change in land hydrology,
and the atmosphere; Section 5.5.5).
Ice displacement patterns such as the one below will drive a great volume of ice out of the Arctic Ocean and into warmer wate
Ice displacement patterns such as the one below will drive a great
volume of
ice out of the Arctic Ocean and into warmer wate
ice out of the Arctic Ocean
and into warmer
waters.
If
ice is in a glass
and you fill it to the top doesn't the
volume of
water stay the same as the
ice melts?
Whether it exists as
ice or
water, it still has the same mass, it still displaces the same
volume and there's no change in the
volume of the ocean if it melts.
Siberian Arctic shelf
ice volumes is partially function of the ratio of fresh
water inflow from great Siberian rivers (Ob & Yenisei & Lena)
and the saline Arctic sea
waters.
Measuring the distance apart
and speed of 2 satellites in space orbiting the earth to the width of a human hair with no margin for error [damn those drift recalculations],
and taking into account unknown factors with respect to the true values for
water depth,
water weight at different salt concentrations,
ice depth magma flows, volcanic activity etc [ie making a lot of guesses], plus taking human motivation on board [like CO2 increase must melt
ice surely] can give you an accurate measurement of the
volume ice in Antarctica.
Greater
volumes of intruding warm
water cause greater reductions of
ice in the Barents
and Kara Seas, deep inside the Arctic Circle.
From historic droughts around the world
and in places like California, Syria, Brazil
and Iran to inexorably increasing glacial melt; from an expanding blight of fish killing
and water poisoning algae blooms in lakes, rivers
and oceans to a growing rash of global record rainfall events;
and from record Arctic sea
ice volume losses approaching 80 percent at the end of the summer of 2012 to a rapidly thawing permafrost zone explosively emitting an ever - increasing amount of methane
and CO2, it's already a disastrous train - wreck.
To notice something is going on with the world's
ice sheets, you could measure melting
water runoff, glacier retreat or use satellites
and GPS to measure
ice volume decline.
Though the Tibetan earthquake was going to happen at some time, it is possible that changes in
ice loading on Himalayan glaciers, changes in
water volume outflows in the annual Asian monsoon,
and sea level rise adding pressure to the geological plates below coastlines — especially in low - lying Bangladesh — had an impact.
We use realistic estimates of mass redistribution from
ice mass loss
and land
water storage to quantify the resulting ocean bottom deformation
and its effect on global
and regional ocean
volume change estimates.
The outgoing flow through Fram Strait carries with it large
volumes of fresh
water as fragmented pack
ice, a flow that is strongly episodic at decadal scale
and is associated with the series of so called Great Salinity Anomalies observed within the circulation of the subarctic gyre
and in the Nordic seas that were discussed in the previous chapter.
A third of the permanent snow
and ice on New Zealand's Southern Alps has now disappeared, according to research based on aerial surveys by the National Institute of
Water and Atmospheric Research.The researchers say that that since 1977, the
volume of
ice on the nation's Southern Alps has shrunk by more than 18 cubic kilometres [continue reading...]
«This allows us to get a better picture of projected regional
ice volume change
and potential impacts on local
water supplies,
and changes in glacier size distribution,» Radic said.
Ice - sheet volume is controlled by the balance between mass input and mass loss; mass input is almost entirely due to snowfall, and mass loss is from iceberg calving supplied by flow of the ice sheet, or runoff of melt wat
Ice - sheet
volume is controlled by the balance between mass input
and mass loss; mass input is almost entirely due to snowfall,
and mass loss is from iceberg calving supplied by flow of the
ice sheet, or runoff of melt wat
ice sheet, or runoff of melt
water.
b) volumetric effects — change in the
volume of
water contained in the oceans
and the geometry
and areal extent of the ocean basins c) gravitational effects — change in the gravitational attraction of the earth (induced by deformation), by the change in distribution of
ice and by the change in self - attraction of the
water d) rotational effects — change in the moment of inertia caused by a change in the distribution of mass within the earth
and on its surface.
However, as the
water vapor rises the lapse rate means that the
volume of air cools
and eventually the
water vapor condenses into
water droplets
and then into
ice latent heat is given off to the surrounding air at each of these phase changes, with two effects.
For a very long time scale (
ice ages
and interglacials) the whole
water volume may be in equilibrium with the atmosphere...» Ahlbeck, J. (1999) at http://www.john-daly.com/oceanco2/oceanco2.htm
That's the case in Antarctica, which is geographically very different to the Arctic, where an increase in surface sea
ice area, but not total
volume, is currently being observed due to increased precipitation
and increased surface
water run off.
John, Sea
ice forming or melting will have no effect on sea level either way, as it is already in the
water, the
ice is already a part of the ocean's
volume and including the parts above the
water line it is displacing equivalent
volumes to what its melt
water will occupy.
What is alarming is that the
volume of
water and the extent
and rapidity of its movement is suprisingly much greater than previously believed,
and that a possible, perhaps likely, effect of this on
ice sheet dynamics is to make the
ice sheets less stable
and more likely to respond more quickly to global warming than previously expected.
I have no supporting calculations, but for fun — how about wind - powered (tapping the notoriously consistent katabatic flow off the
ice caps) snow - making machines on Greenland
and Antarctica to sequester the excess oceanic
water volume,
and thus to thwart sea level rise.
Together, the present Antarctic
and Greenland
ice sheets contain enough
water to raise sea level by almost 70 m if they were to melt, so that only a small fractional change in their
volume would have a significant effect.