Not exact matches
Telescopes spied water
in ice caps
at the Red Planet's
poles, as well as signs of an ancient ocean covering the northern hemisphere.
Radar signals bounced off a crater on the moon's south
pole by the US Clementine spacecraft
in 1994 hinted
at the presence of water
ice.
Despite this effect, the known
ice loss
at both
poles suggests that embedded
in the local rises is a signal of current climate change — researchers just have to tease it out.
Last week, Thompson's colleagues measured the
ice levels
at survey
poles that they had inserted last year; more than a meter of
ice had melted
in 12 months, out of a total thickness of 20 to 50 meters.
«People had calculated that water
ice would be stable
at the
pole, but no one knew whether it actually existed there,» says planetary scientist William Boynton of the University of Arizona
in Tucson, who is
in charge of the instrument that found the
ice.
Because Mercury's axis of rotation doesn't tilt
at all (which means there's no summer or winter) some deep craters
at the
poles may be
in perpetual shadow, and that could protect any
ice patches from the heat of the sun.
The relative thinness of the
ice shell
at the south
pole could also allow a future space exploration mission to gather data,
in particular using radar, which would be far more reliable and easy to obtain than with the 40 km thick
ice shell initially calculated.
Since a thinner
ice shell retains less heat, the tidal effects caused by Saturn on the large fractures
in the
ice at the south
pole are no longer enough to explain the strong heat flow affecting this region.
An international team including researchers from the Laboratoire de Planétologie Géodynamique de Nantes (CNRS / Université de Nantes / Université d'Angers), Charles University
in Prague, and the Royal Observatory of Belgium [1] recently proposed a new model that reconciles different data sets and shows that the
ice shell
at Enceladus's south
pole may be only a few kilometers thick.
For starters, the orbiter beamed back incredibly detailed stereo photos of the surface, measured the ozone distribution
in the planet's atmosphere, and confirmed the presence of water
ice at the south
pole.
Charon is dark gray and rich
in water
ice, because it is not massive enough to hold onto the brighter methane and nitrogen
ices seen on Pluto — except, maybe,
at Charon's
pole.
Last Thursday, jubilant National Aeronautics and Space Administration researchers announced that the Lunar Prospector spacecraft had confirmed earlier indications that
ice exists
in potentially extractable quantities
in the dark, cold regions
at both of the moon's
poles.
ICESat - II, which will track changes
in ice cover
at the
poles, could launch as early as 2014.
Claudio Castelnovo, a postdoctoral physicist
at the University of Oxford who co-authored one of the Science papers and also co-wrote a paper
in Nature last year describing how monopoles might be realized
in spin
ices, explains that the compounds offer a peculiar combination of order and freedom that facilitates the dissociation of the
poles.
Multiple observations indicate that the flowing water responsible for shaping and moving the rounded pebbles encountered
in the vicinity of the rover landing area has long since been lost to space, though some of it may still exist deep below the surface of the planet
at equatorial locations (water
ice is known to exist near the surface
at the
poles).
This extraordinary storage ability could help explain NASA's detection
in early March of 650 million tons» worth of
ice at the moon's dark, cold north
pole.
«Finding places where water is present and not just
in the form of
ice up
at the
poles is useful for planning future exploration.»
Water exists
in abundance on Mars — as
ice seen
at the
poles by the Mars Odyssey orbiter and frozen into the Martian soil.
But
in December 2012, when the
ice moon was
at its farthest point from the gas giant, they caught a pair of plumes bearing clear signs of oxygen and hydrogen — the components of water vapor — shooting from near the southern
pole.
His «we do not know of a time with permanent
ice at the
poles and CO2 above 1000pmmv» (except, of course, prior to the big thaw
in snowball Earth), and the present rate of increase of atmospheric CO2 being c. 10x greater than previous mass extinctions as far as we know (albeit the total mass being less) are deeply worrying.
Polar amplification,
in which temperatures
at the
poles rise more rapidly than temperatures
at the equator (due to factors like the global atmospheric and oceanic circulation of heat from the equator to the
poles), plays a major role
in the rate of
ice sheet retreat.
Now, giant cyclones
at the planet's
poles have been seen
in greater detail than ever before — they are not only stunning, but unique from atmospheric storms of any other planet
in the Solar System, even other gas and
ice giants.
Regarding the possibility that human emission - related warming will prevent the next
ice age, I read somewhere that technically we are still
in an
ice age, the inter-glacial part of it, and that an
ice age is defined as when the Earth has permenent snow and
ice at the
poles.
It's fascinating to know that when the asteroid struck Earth, our planet was already
in a hot time, with no
ice at the
poles.
These twins
in space can measure changes of gravity
in land, sub-surface waters, and
ice at the
poles.
With the rising levels of BPA and other plastic chemicals found
in our groundwater, ocean water, and even buried under 30 feet of
ice at the south
pole, experts warn that these chemicals may be contributing to the rising health problems we are seeing worldwide.
I don't think the stunning pair of
pole positions and lights - to - flag wins
at Cadwell Park
in the 1997 Mighty Mini Challenge cut much
ice, but more modest success
at the Nürburgring, Pikes Peak and Bonneville Speed Week clearly did something to convince them I'm not a complete muppet.
As the last
ice age began, some 125,000 years ago, part of the water evaporated from the world's oceans and fell as snow
at the
poles and
in the northern parts of the continents to slowly form
ice caps and glaciers.
In Andrew Revkin's article today entitled «In Greenland, Ice and Instability», there is the quote: Eric Rignot, a longtime student of ice sheets at both poles for NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, said he hoped the public and policymakers did not interpret uncertainty in the 21st - century forecast as reason for complacency on the need to limit risks by cutting emission
In Andrew Revkin's article today entitled «
In Greenland, Ice and Instability», there is the quote: Eric Rignot, a longtime student of ice sheets at both poles for NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, said he hoped the public and policymakers did not interpret uncertainty in the 21st - century forecast as reason for complacency on the need to limit risks by cutting emission
In Greenland,
Ice and Instability», there is the quote: Eric Rignot, a longtime student of ice sheets at both poles for NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, said he hoped the public and policymakers did not interpret uncertainty in the 21st - century forecast as reason for complacency on the need to limit risks by cutting emissio
Ice and Instability», there is the quote: Eric Rignot, a longtime student of
ice sheets at both poles for NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, said he hoped the public and policymakers did not interpret uncertainty in the 21st - century forecast as reason for complacency on the need to limit risks by cutting emissio
ice sheets
at both
poles for NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, said he hoped the public and policymakers did not interpret uncertainty
in the 21st - century forecast as reason for complacency on the need to limit risks by cutting emission
in the 21st - century forecast as reason for complacency on the need to limit risks by cutting emissions.
One other factor here is increased evaporation
at the equator which has increased the salanity of tropical waters along with increased percipitation
at the
poles seems to be making the thermohaline system move faster which
in turn carries move heat to the
poles and hence increases polar
ice melting and hence possibly a greater chance of slowdown of the thermohaline system.
Polar amplification,
in which temperatures
at the
poles rise more rapidly than temperatures
at the equator (due to factors like the global atmospheric and oceanic circulation of heat from the equator to the
poles), plays a major role
in the rate of
ice sheet retreat.
Nobody quoted
in the article says the
pole will be
ice free, certainly nobody
at Boulder, nor even did «The Independent», the source of the article.
[ANDY REVKIN comments: The Antarctic has seen no change
in the extent of floating sea
ice in recent years,
in stark contrast to the situation
in the Arctic, and all of this shows the Earth's climate system, particularly
at the
poles, is not simple — and thus not likely to follow a simple trajectory under a greenhouse push from humans.
In it Dr McCarthy reported that there was no ice at the North pole in 200
In it Dr McCarthy reported that there was no
ice at the North
pole in 200
in 2000.
On Mr. Will's defense of his accuracy, particularly on trends
in sea
ice at both
poles as they related to global warming, it's worth pointing out a few things.
Given that your link to the naval history account of the USS Skate's surfacing
at the north
pole skewered your claims about the possibility of the north
pole having been
ice free
in 1958, I'll take door number two from the choices above.
In that case, the report was of the presence of some open water
at the
pole — which as the correction stated, is not that uncommon as
ice floes and leads interact.
A new analysis of the dramatic cycles of
ice ages and warm intervals over the past million years, published
in Nature, concludes that the climatic swings are the gyrations of a system poised to settle into a quasi-permanent colder state — with expanded
ice sheets
at both
poles.
In the meantime, the small global network of
ice, climate and ocean specialists trying to make sense of
ice behavior
at both
poles are — as always — working to use each year's data to refine their still crude models.
It is not that the polar regions are amplifying the warming «going on»
at lower latitudes, it is that any warming going on AT THE POLES is amplified through inherent positive feedback processes AT THE POLES, and specifically this is primarily the ice - albedo positive feedback process whereby more open water leads to more warming leads to more open water, etc. *** «Climate model simulations have shown that ice albedo feedbacks associated with variations in snow and sea - ice coverage are a key factor in positive feedback mechanisms which amplify climate change at high northern latitudes...&raqu
at lower latitudes, it is that any warming going on
AT THE POLES is amplified through inherent positive feedback processes AT THE POLES, and specifically this is primarily the ice - albedo positive feedback process whereby more open water leads to more warming leads to more open water, etc. *** «Climate model simulations have shown that ice albedo feedbacks associated with variations in snow and sea - ice coverage are a key factor in positive feedback mechanisms which amplify climate change at high northern latitudes...&raqu
AT THE
POLES is amplified through inherent positive feedback processes
AT THE POLES, and specifically this is primarily the ice - albedo positive feedback process whereby more open water leads to more warming leads to more open water, etc. *** «Climate model simulations have shown that ice albedo feedbacks associated with variations in snow and sea - ice coverage are a key factor in positive feedback mechanisms which amplify climate change at high northern latitudes...&raqu
AT THE
POLES, and specifically this is primarily the
ice - albedo positive feedback process whereby more open water leads to more warming leads to more open water, etc. *** «Climate model simulations have shown that
ice albedo feedbacks associated with variations
in snow and sea -
ice coverage are a key factor
in positive feedback mechanisms which amplify climate change
at high northern latitudes...&raqu
at high northern latitudes...»
Therefore, the increase
in sea
ice is caused by increasing cold
at the
pole.
Sixthly, during the
ice age, which amounts to 80 or 90 % of the time, there is no Arctic Ocean
at all, the entire north
pole covered
in ice several miles thick.
In November, even CNN reported on the record - low
ice extent
at both
poles.
We might learn more from looking more closely
at the descent of White and his kind from «progressive» to authoritarian than we might from looking
at charts depicting the extent of sea
ice in the
poles.
Typical temperature reconstructions for the late Pliocene however [see one
at the top of this story - 3.3 - 3.0 Ma] already show an Earth
in which a warmer climatic state is indeed [through for instance
ice albedo feedbacks] relatively strong around the
poles, and (on average) weaker around the equator, exactly the pattern that is monitored under the current climate warming.
For example, conditions
at the
poles affect how much heat is retained by the earth because of the reflective properties of
ice and snow, the world's ocean circulation depends on sinking
in polar regions, and melting of the Antarctic and Greenland
ice sheets could have drastic effects on sea level.
One day, no matter what we do, this cool period we're
in now will end and we'll have to contend with palm trees on the North Slope and
in Siberial, and NO
Ice at the
poles.
The backdrop to the renewed interest
in asserting territorial claims on the Arctic and Antarctic by states such as Canada, the United States, Russia and the United Kingdom is that global warming, and
in particular the warming of oceans, is leading to accelerating erosion of the
ice mass
at both
poles.
When the Earth is
in its «
Ice House» climate mode, there is ice at the pol
Ice House» climate mode, there is
ice at the pol
ice at the
poles.
There have only been three coldhouse periods (i.e. with
ice at the
poles)
in the past 550 million years (the time that multi-cell animal life has been thriving on the planet) and we are
in the third one now.