The highly accurate
ice core data sets rathr precise dates for three major (and tropical) eruptions for which previous studies by traditional methods of paleogeology gave only poorer approximations.
Not exact matches
In this paper, we use the Spitzer c2d
ice survey, complimented with
data sets on
ices in cloud
cores and high - mass protostars, to determine standard
ice abundances and to present a coherent picture of the evolution of
ices during low - and high - mass star formation.
What the medical «experts» have missed is the fact that someone receiving a diagnosis of cancer will tend to smoke even more in an effort to calm himself down,
setting up a feedback similar to what we see in the
ice core data.
The authors compared recently constructed temperature
data sets from Antarctica, based on
data from
ice cores and ground weather stations, to 20th century simulations from computer models used by scientists to simulate global climate.
The
ice core data also agree quite well with the tree ring
data where these
data sets overlap.
Which is not surprising, given that the
ice core data suggest that this feedback only
sets in with a delay of hundreds of years after the warming starts.
Has anyone yet talked up designing a Mars lander that would be able to drill a
core from the polar
ice cap, scan it and give us another
data set?
There is extensive experimental
data in the physics and chemistry of the greenhouse process, in tens of thousands of
data sets demonstrating impacts of the changing climate, as well as in paleo - climatic measurements, such as
ice cores.
There are the famous
data sets: the Vostok
ice core drilled in the 1970s that looks back about 400,000 years, the Keeling curve started in 1958,
data from satellites that watch sea
ice retreat starting around 1979.
From an article on Taylor Dome
ice cores, «The
data set consists of depth (m),
ice age (kyr BP 1950)...»
Notice that the stomata record is invariably higher than the
ice core record, where both
sets of
data exist.
The second
set of
ice core data corroborated that the changes were very, very, rapid.
the only reason that i can think of, is that the
ice core data can be manipulated by leaving out a substantial portion of the
data set, or adjusting time scales as one author claimed that the trap gas was 83 years younger than the
ice.