Not exact matches
At summer's end, sea -
ice coverage was one - third smaller than the average from 1979 to 2000.
Last Friday afternoon, on a conference call hosted by the National Research Council to present a recent report on the Arctic region, Stephanie Pfirman, an environmental science professor
at Barnard College, said Arctic
ice coverage is shrinking and that thicker sea
ice blocks, which anchor much of the landscape, are rapidly melting.
At the moment, this year's annual summer minimum Arctic - wide
ice coverage is the fourth lowest on record, with similar low coverage in the NWP, according to information provided by the Canadian Ice Servi
ice coverage is the fourth lowest on record, with similar low
coverage in the NWP, according to information provided by the Canadian
Ice Servi
Ice Service.
As Weir points out, it likely owes its survival as a species on being geographically isolated from its parental species
at some point during a past
ice age when rainforest
coverage contracted, and wide rivers formed natural barriers.
Arctic sea
ice coverage is still below average and the previously stable Antarctic sea
ice extent was
at or near a record low, the statement adds.
As for now, be sure to check in
at RogerEbert.com for more Sundance 2016
coverage, as this thoroughly exciting, complete lineup provides a Herzog - ian
ice mountain of which we are raring to climb like that penguin in Herzog's «Encounters
at the End of the World.»
Someone with Texas renters insurance might scoff
at the idea of needing
coverage for the weight of
ice and snow.
The liability
coverage will take care of accidents such as someone slipping on
ice or cover legal expenses if are sued you for a indecent that took place
at the property.
The «Perils of Extrapolation» of the title finally comes to rest on a discussion of «extrapolation» which explicitly names AMEG
at its outset, and concludes that, «Predictions of earlier
ice - free dates (he means, before 2037) so far seem to be confined to conference presentations, media -
coverage, the blogosphere, and testimony before to the UK parliament.»
Qualitative indicators like sea
ice coverage, spring thaw dates, and melting permafrost provide strong additional evidence that trends have been positive
at middle and high northern latitudes, while glacier retreat suggests warming aloft
at lower latitudes.
Indeed, there is no way to truly compare
ice coverage during the 1930's to 40's but the source of that speculation was pictures taken from submarines that surfaced
at the north pole with considerable open waters.
You can find out more (and see links to my earlier
coverage of Arctic sea -
ice trends, and what's going on with sea
ice at the other end of the planet) in my latest post on Dot Earth.
The marine coring record for the Arctic suggests that the Artic has never been (summer time)
ice free for
at least hundreds of millions of years; you'll have to find the papers and look
at the extent of
coverage yourself.
Given that this summer's minimum has fallen below last year's and will settle in
at the 2nd or 3rd lowest on record, last summer's minimum now appears more as a bump in the road toward continuing lower Arctic sea
ice coverage.
It is not that the polar regions are amplifying the warming «going on»
at lower latitudes, it is that any warming going on AT THE POLES is amplified through inherent positive feedback processes AT THE POLES, and specifically this is primarily the ice - albedo positive feedback process whereby more open water leads to more warming leads to more open water, etc. *** «Climate model simulations have shown that ice albedo feedbacks associated with variations in snow and sea - ice coverage are a key factor in positive feedback mechanisms which amplify climate change at high northern latitudes...&raqu
at lower latitudes, it is that any warming going on
AT THE POLES is amplified through inherent positive feedback processes AT THE POLES, and specifically this is primarily the ice - albedo positive feedback process whereby more open water leads to more warming leads to more open water, etc. *** «Climate model simulations have shown that ice albedo feedbacks associated with variations in snow and sea - ice coverage are a key factor in positive feedback mechanisms which amplify climate change at high northern latitudes...&raqu
AT THE POLES is amplified through inherent positive feedback processes
AT THE POLES, and specifically this is primarily the ice - albedo positive feedback process whereby more open water leads to more warming leads to more open water, etc. *** «Climate model simulations have shown that ice albedo feedbacks associated with variations in snow and sea - ice coverage are a key factor in positive feedback mechanisms which amplify climate change at high northern latitudes...&raqu
AT THE POLES, and specifically this is primarily the
ice - albedo positive feedback process whereby more open water leads to more warming leads to more open water, etc. *** «Climate model simulations have shown that
ice albedo feedbacks associated with variations in snow and sea -
ice coverage are a key factor in positive feedback mechanisms which amplify climate change
at high northern latitudes...&raqu
at high northern latitudes...»
«Climate model simulations have shown that
ice albedo feedbacks associated with variations in snow and sea -
ice coverage are a key factor in positive feedback mechanisms which amplify climate change
at high northern latitudes...»
Then from 1995 to 2002, the
ice area actually increased (although you would never read that in the popular press), it decreased again in 2004, and in 2005 it increased again â $ ¦ and
at the end of 2005, the amount of Arctic
ice was back to the 1979 - 2000 average
ice coverage.
The problem is that we have only been looking
at Arctic
ice coverage properly during the warming phase of the 60y recurrent pattern.
When I look
at the Great Lakes
Ice coverage using Environment Canada Ice Service, I see regions of ice along the shores and bays and waters between islands, 0.5 % of ice coverage so f
Ice coverage using Environment Canada
Ice Service, I see regions of ice along the shores and bays and waters between islands, 0.5 % of ice coverage so f
Ice Service, I see regions of
ice along the shores and bays and waters between islands, 0.5 % of ice coverage so f
ice along the shores and bays and waters between islands, 0.5 % of
ice coverage so f
ice coverage so far.
The report, led by scientists
at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, also found that maximum winter sea
ice coverage in the Arctic was the smallest ever recorded.
Morover, I think you really should look
at more recent work by Polyakov — say, his 2012 paper, «Recent Changes of Arctic Multiyear Sea
Ice coverage and the Likely Causes.»
Sea levels are a foot higher and Arctic
ice coverage is
at the lowest levels ever — the
ice was gone as of March, months early.
600
At all stages, seeds of regime reversal are embedded within the collection of sub-processes regulating the Arctic freshwater balance, thereby subtly and incrementally imposing «curbs» on the prevailing trend of sea
ice coverage, assuring an inevitable regime reversal years in the future.
Or look
at it the other way around: if the
ice cover were a record high in late summer, the opportunity for
ice growth (increased area
coverage) would be reduced, since there would be less open water that could freeze over.
Yet, since on rare occasion they have not seen it because it is so obvious it is worth asking about and one might even learn something Worse, in Eli's case, this is something that finally percolated through because of nonsense that Andrew Montford
at Bishop Hill wrote trying to handwave the weird
ice coverage this winter up north (yes, Eli knows everybunny and his brother in law is racing south to watch the Antarctic
ice shelves collapse, but this is Rabett Run, Eli and Brian follow their own pipers).
If the previous melt was localised around Spitzbergen, why hasn't he offered any evidence of extensive
ice coverage elsewhere
at the time?
The re-freeze continues in December, such that the
ice coverage is pretty much
at the median level today.
This coincided with record - breaking shrinkage of Arctic sea
ice, where total
coverage at the peak of melting season is now 40 percent lower than in the late 1970s.
For both summer and winter Arctic sea -
ice, the area
coverage is declining
at present (with summer sea -
ice declining more markedly; ref.
To expand the
coverage of global gridded reanalyses, the 20th Century Reanalysis Project is an effort led by PSD and the CIRES
at the University of Colorado to produce a reanalysis dataset spanning the entire twentieth century, assimilating only surface observations of synoptic pressure, monthly sea surface temperature and sea
ice distribution.
The Statement also highlighted that long - term indicators of climate change such as increasing carbon dioxide concentrations, sea level rise and ocean acidification continue «unabated», with Arctic sea
ice coverage remaining below average and the previously stable Antarctic sea
ice extent
at or near a record low.
I understand that the
ice coverage in Greenland is melting now
at roughly 3ft per year.
Scientific confidence of the occurrence of climate change include, for example, that over
at least the last 50 years there have been increases in the atmospheric concentration of CO2; increased nitrogen and soot (black carbon) deposition; changes in the surface heat and moisture fluxes over land; increases in lower tropospheric and upper ocean temperatures and ocean heat content; the elevation of sea level; and a large decrease in summer Arctic sea
ice coverage and a modest increase in Antarctic sea
ice coverage.
Meanwhile, 6,000 kilometers to the north, the Arctic has less sea
ice than
at any time in the 37 years that satellites have been measuring
ice coverage.
This year, as has been true since 1979, that sea
ice coverage is abundant across the Arctic for seals that are giving birth and mating
at this time as well as for polar bears busy feeding on young seals and mating.
The plummeting sea
ice levels are of grave concern, but there is very little media
coverage of what is unfolding
at the poles.
Someone with Texas renters insurance might scoff
at the idea of needing
coverage for the weight of
ice and snow.