Sentences with phrase «ice data comes»

The service's ice data comes from the OSI SAF project, which is funded by the European Organisation for the Exploitation of Meteorological Satellites (EUMETSAT) and operated by Norway.

Not exact matches

«The study gives us a really good handle on how to approximate how much ice Greenland is going to lose in the coming century,» says Ted Scambos of the US National Snow and Ice Data Center in Boulder, Coloraice Greenland is going to lose in the coming century,» says Ted Scambos of the US National Snow and Ice Data Center in Boulder, ColoraIce Data Center in Boulder, Colorado.

Security group calls U.S. unprepared for Arctic changes The analysis from the National Snow and Ice Data Center comes on the heels of several scientific and policy papers in the past week warning about the consequences of Arctic ice loIce Data Center comes on the heels of several scientific and policy papers in the past week warning about the consequences of Arctic ice loice loss.

The data to assess sea - ice coverage come from polar - orbiting satellites carrying passive - microwave sensors that can see through clouds.

Unlike previous Pliocene models, this «no ice» version returned temperatures 18 to 27 F warmer than today's average annual temperatures for the Canadian Arctic and Greenland, coming closer to what the historical data pulled from the ground said.

That's because Schaefer and colleagues» data comes from a single point in the middle of Greenland, pointing to a range of possible scenarios of what happened in the past, including several that challenge the image of Greenland being continuously covered by an extensive ice sheet during the Pleistocene.

Since the data the team collected only came from samples off the east side of Greenland, their results don't provide a definitive picture of the whole Greenland ice sheet.

The overarching goal for Bindschadler and many other Antarctic researchers is to hand off enough data to modelers so they can figure out how the Antarctic ice is going to change in the coming decades, and how those changes will affect the rest of the world.

Analysis of the data showed that despite isolated cases where ice volume and thickness increased, none of the advancing glaciers have come close to the maximums achieved during the so - called «Little Ice Age» — a period of cooling between the sixteenth and the nineteenth centuice volume and thickness increased, none of the advancing glaciers have come close to the maximums achieved during the so - called «Little Ice Age» — a period of cooling between the sixteenth and the nineteenth centuIce Age» — a period of cooling between the sixteenth and the nineteenth century.

The data they gather will set scientists up with a solid baseline to monitor future changes and predict what comes next as Antarctica's floating ice shelves retreat and even collapse due to climate change.

Arctic sea - ice cover is predicted from coming July 1 to November 1, using the data from satellite microwave sensors, AMSR - E (2002/03 -2010 / 11) and AMSR2 (2012/13 -2016 / 17).

[Further Response: Our estimates of the magnitude of future global warming do not come from ice core data, and do not depend on it in any way.

So again it comes back to the proxy data, is there lots of cooling, or just lots of ice, or both?

Related: [VIDEO] The Ice Bucket Challenge Filmed with the 2015 Corvette Stingray's PDR [VIDEO] Valet Mode with Performance Data Recorder Coming to 2015 Corvettes [VIDEO] The 2015 Corvette's Performance Data Recorder Demonstration from the NCM Bash

Clifford Mass disagreement is incoherent, not at all in line with reality, he has to make a case when significant sigmas show warming when there is actually GT cooling, actually I am sure that there are contrarians out there who believe in the looming coming ice age, but strictly looking at data from the Arctic, there is a great warming happening.

Dr Maslowski made an estimate in 2007 which used data through 2004 and came up with 2013 as the first year with a total meltdown of arctic sea ice.

Dr. Pollard and Dr. DeConto ran a five - million - year computer simulation of the ice sheet's comings and goings, using data on past actual climate and ocean conditions gleaned from seabed samples (the subject of the other paper) to validate the resulting patterns.

The CO2 level comes from half a dozen different ice core analyses, while the temperature data come from marine sediments, pollen analyses, isotopes, corals etc..

I would also add that the «prediction» made by # 11 about what a D - O event would look like is based on the Greenland ice core records, and the picture of «abrupt warming / slow cooling» picture comes from the data on millennial timescales.

Surely the IPCC and others at GISS can come up with based on the based available observational evidence and paretial difference equations and paleo climatic data a bloody good guess as to what response ice sheets will have to a known temperature rise come BAU to overall CO2 levels of 450 to 550 ppmv come the centurys end.

In our paper, based on data from Jason Box from the Geologic Survey of Denmark and Greenland, we estimated that the Greenland ice sheet has already come out of equilibrium since the beginning of the 20th century and has since added about 13,000 cubic kilometers of meltwater to the ocean.

[Further Response: Our estimates of the magnitude of future global warming do not come from ice core data, and do not depend on it in any way.

The application of trends to climate data began in the 1970s with the prediction of a coming ice age as temperatures declined from 1940.

At least relative to my questions above, what struck me was the possibility of starting with your reduction and analysis of the snow cover / fall anomaly data to come up with a research project based on some quite complicated but fascinating calculations on net TOA energy balance as a result of your conclusion about the relation of Arctic sea ice loss to NH snow cover / amount anomaly.

The pre-1960 data, which comes from ice core samples, has many more problems.

Ironically, NASA data from this same graph sparked the «coming ice age» scare of the 1970s.

All that is required is to take, as a working hypothesis the fairly small and reasonable step of accepting that the recent peak was also a peak in the 1000 year cycle This periodicity seen in seen in the temperature proxy and ice core data data in Figs 3 and 4 in the last post at http://climatesense-norpag.blogspot.com This post also contains a forecast of the timing and extent of the coming cooling.

My other point to him at the time was that the Industrial Revolution was actually quite limited and that it wasn't until the forties last century that industry spread, but he ignored this as he ignored the email about getting rid of the MWP and LIA and when I found the Vostok data, and began to appreciate the great cycles within our Ice Age, he dismissed these too and came back to the claim that our temps had been «flat normal» and our fault that we were changing this by our increased production of carbon dioxide as the Hockey Stick showed.

This «new evidence» is based on a single analysis of «proxy» data (that is, data that do not come from thermometers but rather from sources like tree rings, ice cores, corals, and ocean and lake sediments) showing the twentieth century to be the warmest in the past thousand years.

Our sea ice prediction data sources come from the National Snow and Ice Data Centice prediction data sources come from the National Snow and Ice Data Cendata sources come from the National Snow and Ice Data CentIce Data CenData Center.

Regarding the comment https://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/07/11/the-bbcs-richard-black-engages-in-goldilocks-picking/#comment-698615 I would like to point that the reliability of the Greenland ice core data is coming under strong scrutiny.

Note: The Sea Ice Index input data comes from the passive microwave instrument on the DMSP satellites, but IMS uses the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer - Earth Observing System (AMSR - E) instrument on the Aqua satellite from 2002 to 2011.

The input data comes from the 1 km and 4 km Interactive Multisensor Snow and Ice Mapping System (IMS) snow and ice product produced by the National Ice Center (NIIce Mapping System (IMS) snow and ice product produced by the National Ice Center (NIice product produced by the National Ice Center (NIIce Center (NIC).

Early in my research I came across the topic of CO2 lagging behind the temperature data in the ice core data.

This data comes from a paper lead authored by Australian climate scientist John Church that tallies up the heat accumulating in the oceans, warming the land and atmosphere and melting the ice:

Therefore, warmists, I agree that CAGW is theorectically possble and can not be ruled out just as every other trendline (like the coming ice age) can not be ruled out due to the paucity of data and understanding we presently have.

That's an oversight that I intend to rectify, starting with a dissection of Solomon's recent misrepresentation of the latest Arctic sea ice extent data, said to «augur» coming «global cooling».

Modern day data on what is happening beneath the ice sheets is difficult to come by.

These data came from near the bottom of the hole, where the ice layers were squeezed tissue - thin and probably folded and distorted as they flowed over the bedrock.

Although researchers may still largely be dealing in uncertainties when it comes to predicting Greenland's exact fate, the data and observations that continue to trickle in suggest a «greener» (see: ice - free) future for the island nation.

All evidence points to a coming Ice Age, which is due anytime soon, and that is backed up by solid 100 % real world historical data, not some BS computer models with programmers in the pay of the environmental movement.

And regardless of the accuracy of this paleo data, we are talking roughly 4 degrees coming out of the ice age over 8,000 years.

The data on this winter's ice buildup came on the day that international ministers gathered in Washington to address issues facing Earth's polar regions, which have been disproportionately affected by global warming.

The earlier data comes from some sort of proxy analysis (ice cores, tree rings, sediments, etc.) While we know these proxies generally change with temperature, there are still a lot of questions as to their accuracy and, perhaps more importantly for us here, whether they vary linearly or have any sort of attenuation of the peaks.

It is not possible to calculate the effect of anthropogenic CO2 until we know within closer limits what the natural variation is.For example if you look at the ice core data for the Holocene and if you believe that CO2 is the climate driver you would have to conclude that on a scale of thousands of years CO2 was an Ice House — not a green house gas.For the data and an estimate of the coming cooling for the next few hundred years check the post» Climate Forecasting for Britain's Seven Alarmist Scientists and for UK Politicians.&raqice core data for the Holocene and if you believe that CO2 is the climate driver you would have to conclude that on a scale of thousands of years CO2 was an Ice House — not a green house gas.For the data and an estimate of the coming cooling for the next few hundred years check the post» Climate Forecasting for Britain's Seven Alarmist Scientists and for UK Politicians.&raqIce House — not a green house gas.For the data and an estimate of the coming cooling for the next few hundred years check the post» Climate Forecasting for Britain's Seven Alarmist Scientists and for UK Politicians.»

Anyone coming to this debate should really look at the ice core data before even starting discussions.

IPCC has been myopically fixating on the recent «blip» in our climate (measured since 1850, but with emphasis starting around 1976), trying to tie it to another «blip» in atmospheric CO2 (measured since 1958, with some somewhat questionable ice core data before 1958), which IPCC is assuming has come from anthropogenic sources.