Indeed, the record - breaking losses in the past couple of years could easily be due to natural fluctuations in the weather, with summer sea
ice increasing again over the next few years.
Not exact matches
In science news around the world, NASA scientists spot evidence for
ice volcanoes on the surface of Pluto, transmission of the Ebola virus comes to an end in Sierra Leone, Canada's new minister of innovation, science, and economic development reinstates the country's long - form census and announces that government scientists are free
again to speak to the media, the United Kingdom's House of Commons Science and Technology Committee calls for a strategy to
increase government research funding, and more.
Although
again I challenge you to name even five polar scientists who do not think human - caused global warming is the dominant cause of «the
increasing summer retreats of sea
ice.»
Then from 1995 to 2002, the
ice area actually
increased (although you would never read that in the popular press), it decreased
again in 2004, and in 2005 it
increased again â $ ¦ and at the end of 2005, the amount of Arctic
ice was back to the 1979 - 2000 average
ice coverage.
At the beginning of the Holocene - after the end of the last
Ice Age - global temperature
increased, and subsequently it decreased
again by 0.7 ° C over the past 5000 years.
So when you transport enormous amounts of warm tropical waters to the poles for about 400,000 years, you end up with
ice ages, which after a while may shut down the MOC
again, further
increasing the polar cooling, as for instance happened at the Younger Dryas.
«So there's a lag between how fast the earth's system can respond and the extremely rapid way humans are
increasing CO2,» Brigham - Grette said, warning that the Arctic could once
again become
ice - free if greenhouse gases continue to be pumped into the atmosphere.
Antarctic
ice extent setting new records last year, and close to breaking them this year
again Extreme weather as measured by ACE on a decline for decades Drought as measured by Palmer Drought Index flat for decades Sea level
increases not accelerating and possibly starting to decelerate Signature tropospheric hot spot completely missing Scientists by the bushel coming up with some of the most absurd excuses as to why....
As sea
ice recedes with
increasing spring and summer insolation, feeding grounds once
again become available.
Even the Vostok or Dome C
ice cores over the past 420 kyr or 800 kyr have sufficient resolution to show an
increase of 100 ppmv over 100 years (and down
again in 100 years?)
However, the
ice cores also reveal that in the past decade BC and OC began to
increase again, even on the Zuoqiupu glacier (Figure 2), which is mainly subject to Asian sources.
The red line is slope
again, and this time it is positive, indicating an
increase in
ice level from 1978 - Dec 2006.
However, despite this, the team reckon to have perhaps isolated a «global warming» signal in the accelerated run off of the Greenland
Ice Mass — but only just, because the runoff at the edges is balanced by increasing central mass — again, they focus upon recent trends — a net loss of about 22 cubic kilometres in total ice mass per year which they regard as statistically not significant — to find the «signal», and a contradiction to their ealier context of air temperature cycl
Ice Mass — but only just, because the runoff at the edges is balanced by
increasing central mass —
again, they focus upon recent trends — a net loss of about 22 cubic kilometres in total
ice mass per year which they regard as statistically not significant — to find the «signal», and a contradiction to their ealier context of air temperature cycl
ice mass per year which they regard as statistically not significant — to find the «signal», and a contradiction to their ealier context of air temperature cycles.
Negative AO / NAO episodes have
increased from 1995 to 1998, and
again from 2005, leading to a warm AMO, and the acceleration of sea
ice loss.
The natural variation that has led us out of the Little
Ice Age has a bit of frosting on the cake by land use; and, part of that land use has resulted in a change in vegetation and soil CO2 loss so that we see a rise in CO2 and the CO2 continues to rise without a temperature accompaniment (piano player went to take a leak), as the land use has all but gobbled up most of the arable land North of 30N and we are starting to see low till farming and some soil conservation just beginning when the soil will
again take up the CO2, and the GMO's will
increase yields, then CO2 will start coming down on its own and we can go to bed listening to Ave Maria to address another global crisis to get the populous all scared begging governments to tell us much ado about... nothing.
A 2015 study using regional
ice core data reveals no unusual temperature changes but an exceptional 30 %
increase in snow accumulation during the twentieth century,
again supporting Zwally's analysis of mass gain in interior west Antarctica.
I predict that we we will soon see denialist arguments of the form «yeah sure global temperatures are
again rising sharply, but that is due to decreased albedo due to decreased arctic sea
ice, not because
increased CO2 causes global warming».
Heavy
ice conditions in the mid-1970s and mid-1980s caused significant declines in productivity of ringed seals, each of which lasted about 3 years and caused similar declines in the natality of polar bears and survival of subadults, after which reproductive success and survival of both species
increased again.
and 2) Comiso published a subsequent paper (along with Fumihiko Nishio) in 2008 that added only one additional year to the IPCC analysis (i.e. through 2006 instead of 2005), and once
again found a statistically significant
increase in Antarctic sea
ice extent, with a value very similar to the value reported in the old TAR, that is:
As the Arctic sea
ice melts, the water vapor delivered into the the atmosphere
increases in the polar region, and so does the snowfall, so that the whole thing starts over
again.
It will be hilarious to watch you and your anti-science AGW mates squirming and worming over the next few years as the Arctic sea
ice starts to
increase now the AMO is heading downwards
again.
Billev tried to exploit the miserably inaccurate Time article to show that «scientists» showed a decrease in temperature and
increase in sea
ice in the 70's and such conclusions were completely absent from the scientific litterature, once
again.
So, yet
again, this is global warming: Figure 1: Land, atmosphere, and
ice heating (red), 0 - 700 meter ocean heat content (OHC)
increase (light blue), 700 - 2,000 meter OHC
increase (dark blue).